NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 13 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CAMPBELL GLOBAL, LLC, a Delaware No. 18-35337
limited liability company; BASCOM
SOUTHERN, LLC, a Delaware limited D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02091-MO
liability company,
Plaintiff-Appellants, MEMORANDUM*
v.
AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE CO.,
an Indiana corporation; AMERICAN
ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY,
an Indiana corporation; GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a New Hampshire
corporation; and FIRST NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a New Hampshire
corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Oregon
Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 23, 2019
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Portland, Oregon
Before: FARRIS, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Campbell and Bascom appeal from a decision of the District Court granting
partial summary judgment for their insurers in a breach of insurance contract
action. At the conclusion of Campbell and Bascom’s underlying 45-year forestry
operations lease with Alabama landowners, the landowners filed an arbitration
action for breach of contract and negligence, among other claims. The arbitrators
awarded the landowners $3,506,214 in damages. Campbell and Bascom’s insurers
refused to indemnify them for that award.
Under Oregon law, when an insured seeks indemnification for damages it
owes, “what the insured had become obligated to pay as damages and whether the
insurer ultimately was liable under its policy present[] questions of law for the
court to determine by reference to (a) the [insurance] contract and (b) the judgment
and record in the underlying proceeding.” Fountaincourt Homeowners’ Ass’n v.
Fountaincourt Dev., LLC, 380 P.3d 916, 926 (Or. 2016). The insurance policies
defined “occurrence” as “an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to
substantially the same general harmful conditions.” The Oregon Supreme Court
has held that “‘accident’ has a tortious connotation. Damage solely caused by
2
failure to perform a contract is not recoverable in tort.” Kisle v. St. Paul Fire &
Marine Ins. Co., 495 P.2d 1198, 1200 (Or. 1972).
The arbitration award contained the finding that Campbell and Bascom acted
deliberately and in bad faith. For example, they planted substandard seedlings on
the leased land while planting improved seedlings on their own, and they failed to
fix deficiencies in the land despite receiving notice of those deficiencies several
years prior to the expiration of the lease. The actions to which the arbitration award
attributed damages cannot fairly be described as negligent, and therefore were not
a covered “occurrence” under the policies. See Oak Crest Const. Co. v. Austin Mut.
Ins. Co., 998 P.2d 1254, 1257–58 (Or. 2000).
Further, in the paragraph of the arbitration award that enumerates the
damages, the arbitrators (a) cite Campbell and Bascom’s contractual requirement to
return the lands in “good condition,” (b) state that Campbell and Bascom breached
this contractual requirement, and (c) conclude that the property owners suffered
damages “due to” this breach. This is a clear statement that the damages for which
Campbell and Bascom seek indemnification sound in contract. Campbell and
Bascom did not persuasively argue that the arbitration award sounded in
negligence.
3
The arbitrators awarded attorneys’ fees as damages for breach of contract,
which the District Court correctly interpreted not to come within the policies’
coverage. Furthermore, the District Court properly denied Campbell and Bascom’s
motion for reconsideration, which largely restated their previous arguments. In
general, parties may not call on the arbitrators to explain their arbitration award
after the fact.
AFFIRMED.
4