UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2053
FITISTICS, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
SEAN MCKIRDY,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
ERIK B. CHERDAK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 19-1732
FITISTICS, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
SEAN MCKIRDY,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
ERIK B. CHERDAK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00112-LO-JFA; 1:17-cv-00500-LO-
IDD)
Submitted: September 27, 2019 Decided: November 20, 2019
Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erik B. Cherdak, Appellant Pro Se. John Daniel Victor Ferman, BANKS &
ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Erik B. Cherdak appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a bench trial as
well as several orders disposing of the parties’ postjudgment motions. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Fitistics, LLC, v. Cherdak, Nos. 1:16-cv-00112-LO-JFA; 1:17-cv-00500-
LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2018 & June 10, 2019). We deny the motion to supplement
the record on appeal. We deny Fitistics’ and McKirdy’s motion for sanctions, but caution
Cherdak that continued pursuit of vexatious litigation tactics and the filing of frivolous
appeals may result in sanctions in future cases. We deny Cherdak’s motion for oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3