DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 20, 2019
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-01335-CR
REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. W00-50025-K
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Whitehill, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Nowell
On October 30, 2019, Reginald Arleigh Noble filed his notice of appeal. According to the
notice, Mr. Noble filed an application for an article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus in the Criminal
District Court No. 4 on August 8, 2019. That court forwarded the writ to the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals on September 13, 2019. Twelve days later, the court of criminal appeals notified
Mr. Noble by postcard the following:
The Court has previously entered an order citing you for abuse of the writ of habeas
corpus. The application for writ of habeas corpus filed by you in the CRIMINAL
DISTRICT COURT #4, received by this Court on 9/13/2019, does not satisfy the
requirements for consideration set out in the order described above. Therefore, the Court
will take no action on this writ.
Although Mr. Noble seeks to appeal the “abuse of writ from the Court of Criminal
Appeals,” he cites no authority for the proposition we may review actions taken by the Texas Court
of Criminal Appeals. “[O]ur jurisdiction over an appeal must be based on either (1) the general
constitutional grant, subject to any restrictions and regulations imposed by the legislature; or (2) a
specific statutory grant of jurisdiction.” See Harris v. State, 402 S.W.3d 758, 760 (Tex. App.—
Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). We have no jurisdiction to review actions taken by the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Barlow, 48 S.W.3d 174, 175–76 (Tex.
2001); Tune v. Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 23 S.W.3d 358, 361 (Tex. 2000); see also TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.04 (“The Court of Criminal Appeals shall have, and is hereby given, final
appellate and review jurisdiction in criminal cases coextensive with the limits of the state, and its
determinations shall be final.”).
Therefore, we dismiss this appeal.
/ Erin A. Nowell/
ERIN A. NOWELL
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
191335F.U05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Appellant No. 4, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. W00-50025-K.
No. 05-19-01335-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell,
Justices Bridges and Whitehill
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIISMISS this appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Judgment entered November 20, 2019
–3–