NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GRETEL NOEMI GARCIA-GONZALEZ, No. 19-70830
AKA Gretel Gonzalez-Villatoro; HUGO
VILLATORO-GARCIA, Agency Nos. A200-833-733
A200-705-007
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2019**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Gretel Noemi Garcia-Gonzalez and Hugo Villatoro-Garcia, natives and
citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion. Najmabadi
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ untimely
motion to reopen where petitioners failed to demonstrate changed country
conditions in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time
limitation. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990-
91 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 19-70830