This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and KING,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Edgar F. HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800364
Decided: 16 December 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Colonel Matthew J. Kent, USMC. Sentence adjudged
24 August 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps
Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of officer and enlisted
members. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 30 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Jeremy J. Wall, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Captain Brian L. Farrell, USMC.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record and the pleadings, we find that
the sole matter raised by the appellant pursuant to United States v.
Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), lacks merit and requires neither fur-
ther discussion nor relief. United States v. Matias, 25 M.J. 356, (C.M.A.
United States v. Hernandez-Ramirez, NMCCA No. 201800364
1987). The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and no
error materially prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Arti-
cles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 589, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court