DENY and Opinion Filed December 20, 2019
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-01556-CV
IN RE HAROON RASHEED, SOLAR HEALTH P.A., HRMD MANAGEMENT LLC,
TEXAS PAIN PHYSICIANS AND INTEGRATED HOSPITAL SPECIALISTS, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04492
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Reichek
Opinion by Justice Reichek
Before the Court is relators’ December 19, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to
vacate the trial court’s order granting a continuance on relators’ no-evidence motion for summary
judgment.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that a trial judge has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the
mandamus record, as well as the response, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled
to the relief requested.
2
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Amanda L. Reichek/
AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE
191556F.P06
–2–