Filed
Washington State
Court of Appeals
Division Two
January 13, 2020
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
In the Matter of the No. 53591-2-II
Personal Restraint of
MICHAEL ALLEN HEDGES,
Petitioner.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
LEE, A.C.J. — Michael Hedges seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his
2016 plea of guilty to second degree assault with sexual motivation, third degree assault, and
residential burglary.1 Because he was convicted of a sex offense, the trial court imposed a set of
conditions in his judgment and sentence, Appendix H, section (b), including the following:
2) The defendant shall have no contact with minor aged children without prior
approval of the Community Corrections Officer and/or treatment provider.
3) The defendant shall hold no position of authority or trust involving minor aged
children.
Resp. to Personal Restraint Pet., App. A, at 18.
1
Because the State concedes that Hedges’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, his petition
is not subject to RCW 10.73.090’s time-bar.
No. 53591-2-II
Hedges argues that these conditions should be stricken because they are not crime related
in that the victim of his crimes was an adult woman. The State concedes that he is correct. We
agree with Hedges and accept the State’s concession.
Sentencing courts may order an offender to comply with crime-related prohibitions while
they are on community custody. RCW 9.94A.703(3)(f). Here, Hedges was convicted of offenses
against an adult. Therefore, the challenged community custody prohibitions relating to minors are
not crime related. Accordingly, we grant Hedges’s petition and remand to the trial court to vacate
the above conditions from his judgment and sentence.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,
it is so ordered.
LEE, A.C.J.
We concur:
WORSWICK, J.
GLASGOW, J.
2