in Re: Steven B. Aubrey

DENY; Opinion Filed January 14, 2020. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01342-CV IN RE STEVEN B. AUBREY, Relator Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-08135 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell Before the Court is relator’s November 4, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief with respect to two post-judgment discovery orders. In his petition, relator also challenges the trial court’s jurisdiction, and the denial of his motion to appear at an August 14, 2019 hearing by telephone. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, and the mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). /Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE 191342F.P05 –2–