J-S63012-19
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
Appellee :
:
v. :
:
DARRYL (DEWS) WEST, :
:
Appellant : No. 743 EDA 2019
Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019
in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012
CP-51-CR-0001772-2012
CP-51-CR-0014064-2011
COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
Appellee :
:
v. :
:
DARRYL DEWS, :
:
Appellant : No. 744 EDA 2019
Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019
in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012
CP-51-CR-0001772-2012
CP-51-CR-0014064-2011
J-S63012-19
COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
Appellee :
:
v. :
:
DARRYL DEWS, :
:
Appellant : No. 745 EDA 2019
Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019
in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012
CP-51-CR-0001772-2012
CP-51-CR-0014064-2011
BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J.E., MURRAY, J. and STRASSBURGER, J.*
DISSENTING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.:
FILED JANUARY 16, 2020
I respectfully dissent because I would hold disposition of the instant
appeal until after this Court’s en banc review of the following appeals,
Commonwealth v. Rebecca Johnson, 2063 EDA 2018; Commonwealth
v. Ron Larkin, 2761 EDA 2018; and Commonwealth v. Jerome Johnson,
1620 EDA 2018; 2045 EDA 2018; 2046 EDA 2018; and 2047 EDA 2018. On
October 4, 2019, this Court ordered that the aforementioned appeals be listed
before the next available en banc panel. The primary issues are whether (1)
Appellant’s inclusion of multiple court of common pleas docket numbers on his
or her notices of appeal violates Pa.R.A.P. 341 and Commonwealth v.
____________________________________________
* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
-2-
J-S63012-19
Walker, 185 A.3d 969 (Pa. 2018); and (2) if so, whether such violation
necessitates quashal by this Court. Because these issues are precisely before
us in the instant appeal, I would wait until disposition of the en banc cases
before ruling on Appellant’s appeal.
-3-