In Re: Order Amending Rules 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501-1504, 1511-1517, 1531, 1532, 1541-1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 & Adopting Rule

Rule 102. Definitions.

Subject to additional definitions contained in subsequent provisions of these rules
which are applicable to specific provisions of these rules, the following words and
phrases when used in these rules shall have, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, the meanings given to them in this rule:

Action.—Any action or proceeding at law or in equity.

Argument.—Where required by the context, the term includes submission on
briefs.

Administrative office.—The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts.

Appeal.—Any petition or other application to a court for review of subordinate
governmental determinations. The term includes an application for [certiorari]
certiorari under 42 Pa.C.S. § 934 (writs of certiorari) or under any other provision of
law. Where required by the context, the term includes proceedings on petition for
review and petition for specialized review.

Note: Under these rules a ‘‘subordinate governmental determination’’ includes an order
of a trial court. The definition of ‘‘government unit’’ includes courts, and the definition of
‘‘determination’’ includes action or inaction by (and specifically an order entered by) a
court or other government unit. In general, any appeal now extends to the whole
record, with like effect as upon an appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a
jury in an action at law and the scope of review of an order on appeal is not limited as
on broad or narrow certiorari. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 5105(d) (scope of appeal).

Appellant.—Includes petitioner for review or specialized review.

Appellate court.—The Supreme Court, the Superior Court, or the Commonwealth
Court.

Appellee.—Includes a party named as respondent in a petition for review or
specialized review.

Application.—Includes a petition or a motion.

Appropriate security.—Security that meets the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 1734
(appropriate security).
 Children’s fast track appeal.—Any appeal from an order involving dependency,
termination of parental rights, adoptions, custody, or paternity. See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301
et seq.; 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 2511 et seq.; 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 2101 et seq.; 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 53[0]21
et seq.; 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 5102 et seq.

Clerk.—Includes prothonotary.

Counsel of record.—All attorneys who were counsel of record in the trial court at
the time of the filing of the notice of appeal will be counsel of record in the appellate
courts. For a criminal defendant, the representation extends up to and including the
filing of a petition for allowance of appeal and the handling of such an appeal if granted,
unless (1) substitute counsel has entered an appearance and is expressly identified in
the praecipe as substitute, rather than additional, counsel; (2) the Court of Common
Pleas has entered on the docket an order permitting the attorney to withdraw; or (3) an
application for withdrawal is granted by the appellate court.

Determination.—Action or inaction by a government unit which action or inaction
is subject to judicial review by a court under Section 9 of Article V of the Constitution of
Pennsylvania or otherwise. The term includes an order entered by a government unit.

Docket entries.—Includes the schedule of proceedings of a government unit.

General rule.—A rule or order promulgated by or pursuant to the authority of the
Supreme Court.

Government unit.—The Governor and the departments, boards, commissions,
officers, authorities, and other agencies of the Commonwealth, including the General
Assembly and its officers and agencies and any court or other officer or agency of the
unified judicial system, and any political subdivision or municipal or other local authority
or any officer or agency of any such political subdivision or local authority. The term
includes a board of arbitrators whose determination is subject to review under 42
Pa.C.S. § 763(b) (awards of arbitrators).

Hybrid representation.—An attempt to act as counsel for oneself when one has
counsel of record.

Judge.—Includes a justice of the Supreme Court.

Matter.—Action, proceeding, or appeal. The term includes a petition for review
or petition for specialized review.

Order.—Includes judgment, decision, decree, sentence, and adjudication.

2
 Petition for allowance of appeal.—(a) A petition under Pa.R.A.P. 1112 (appeals
to the Supreme Court by allowance); or (b) a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f)
(discretionary aspects of sentence). See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9781.

Petition for permission to appeal.—A petition under Pa.R.A.P. 1311 (interlocutory
appeals by permission).

Petition for review.—A petition under [Pa.R.A.P. 1511 (manner of obtaining
judicial review of governmental determinations)] Chapter 15.

Petition for specialized review.—A petition under Chapter 16.

President judge.—When applied to the Supreme Court, the term means the Chief
Justice of Pennsylvania.

Pro se.—A party representing himself or herself without counsel.

Proof of service.—Includes acknowledgment of service endorsed upon a
pleading.

Quasijudicial order.—An order of a government unit, made after notice and
opportunity for hearing, which is by law reviewable solely upon the record made before
the government unit, and not upon a record made in whole or in part before the
reviewing court.

Reargument.—Includes reconsideration and rehearing, and is requested through
an application filed in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 2541-2547.

Reproduced record.—That portion of the record which has been reproduced for
use in an appellate court. The term includes any supplemental reproduced record.

Rule of court.—A rule promulgated by a court regulating practice or procedure
before the promulgating court(s).

Trial court.—The court from which an appeal is first taken or to be taken.

Verified statement.—A document filed with a clerk under these rules containing
statements of fact and a statement by the signatory that it is made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (unsworn falsification to authorities).

Official Note: Based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 102 (definitions). The definition of
‘‘determination’’ is not intended to affect the scope of review provided by 42 Pa.C.S.
§ 5105(d) (scope of appeal) or other provision of law.

3
Rule 105. Waiver and Modification of Rules.

(a) Liberal construction and modification of rules.—These rules shall be
liberally construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every
matter to which they are applicable. In the interest of expediting decision, or for other
good cause shown, an appellate court may, except as otherwise provided in
[Subdivision] paragraph (b) of this rule, disregard the requirements or provisions of
any of these rules in a particular case on application of a party or on its own motion and
may order proceedings in accordance with its direction.

(b) Enlargement of time.—An appellate court for good cause shown may
upon application enlarge the time prescribed by these rules or by its order for doing any
act, or may permit an act to be done after the expiration of such time, but the court may
not enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal, a petition for allowance of appeal, a
petition for permission to appeal, [or] a petition for review, or a petition for specialized
review.

Official Note: 42 Pa.C.S. § 5504 [(judicial extension of time)] provides that the time
limited by, [inter alia] inter alia, Chapter 55D [(appeals)] of the Judicial Code shall not
be extended by order, rule, or otherwise, except that the time limited may be extended
to relieve fraud or its equivalent, but [that] there [shall] will be no extension of time as
a matter of indulgence or with respect to any criminal proceeding. However, under 42
Pa.C.S. § 5571(a), [(appeals generally)] statutory time limits under Chapter 55D do not
apply to appeals to or other judicial review by the Supreme, Superior, or Commonwealth
Courts.

[Subdivision] Paragraph (b) of this rule is not intended to affect the power of a
court to grant relief in the case of fraud or breakdown in the processes of a court.

4
Rule 120. Entry of Appearance.

Any counsel filing papers required or permitted to be filed in an appellate court
must enter an appearance with the prothonotary of the appellate court unless that
counsel has been previously noted on the docket as counsel pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.
907(b), 1112(f), 1311(d), [or] 1514(d), or 1602(d). New counsel appearing for a party
after docketing pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 907(b), 1112(f), 1311(d), [or] 1514(d), or 1602(d)
shall file an entry of appearance simultaneously with or prior to the filing of any papers
signed by new counsel. The entry of appearance shall specifically designate each party
the attorney represents, and whether the attorney is entering an appearance as
substitute or additional counsel. The attorney shall file a certificate of service pursuant
to paragraph (d) of Pa.R.A.P. 121 and to Pa.R.A.P. 122. If an attorney enters an
appearance as substitute counsel for a party, the original counsel of record for that party
may withdraw by praecipe, without filing an application for permission to withdraw.

Official Note: For admission pro hac vice, [see] see Pa.B.A.R. 301.

5
Rule 121. Filing and Service.

(a) Filing.—Papers required or permitted to be filed in an appellate court shall
be filed with the prothonotary. Filing may be accomplished by mail addressed to the
prothonotary, but except as otherwise provided by these rules, filing shall not be timely
unless the papers are received by the prothonotary within the time fixed for filing. If an
application under these rules requests relief which may be granted by a single judge, a
judge in extraordinary circumstances may permit the application and any related papers
to be filed with that judge. In that event the judge shall note thereon the date of filing
and shall thereafter transmit such papers to the clerk.

(b) Service of all papers required.—Copies of all papers filed by any party and
not required by these rules to be served by the prothonotary shall, concurrently with
their filing, be served by a party or person acting on behalf of that party or person on all
other parties to the matter. Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on
counsel.

(c) Manner of service.—Service may be:

(1) by personal service, which includes delivery of the copy to a clerk or
other responsible person at the office of the person served, but does not include
inter-office mail;

(2) by first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail,
which service is complete upon mailing;

(3) by commercial carrier with delivery intended to be at least as
expeditious as first class mail if the carrier can verify the date of delivery to it; or

(4) by facsimile or e-mail with the agreement of the party being served as
stated in the certificate of service.

(d) Proof of service.—Papers presented for filing shall contain an
acknowledgement of service by the person served or proof of service certified by the
person who made service. Acknowledgement or proof of service may appear on or be
affixed to the papers filed. The clerk may permit papers to be filed without
acknowledgement or proof of service but shall require such to be filed promptly
thereafter.

(e) Additional time after service by mail and commercial carrier.—Whenever a
party is required or permitted to do an act within a prescribed period after service of a
paper upon that party (other than an order of a court or other government unit) and the

6
paper is served by United States mail or by commercial carrier, three days shall be
added to the prescribed period.

(f) Date of filing for incarcerated persons.—A pro se filing submitted by a
person incarcerated in a correctional facility is deemed filed as of the date of the prison
postmark or the date the filing was delivered to the prison authorities for purposes of
mailing as documented by a properly executed prisoner cash slip or other reasonably
verifiable evidence.

(g) Hybrid representation.—Where there is counsel of record, a party may file
only the following documents pro se: (i) a notice of appeal; (ii) a request to change or
remove counsel; (iii) a response to a motion to withdraw that has been filed by counsel
of record; (iv) a complaint that existing counsel has abandoned the party; or (v) an
application to file a petition for allowance of appeal nunc pro tunc. Any other document
that a party attempts to file pro se will be noted on the docket but not accepted for filing.
This rule is not intended to provide an independent basis for jurisdiction where it does
not otherwise exist.

Official Note: Paragraph (a)—The term "related papers" in paragraph (a) of this rule
includes any appeal papers required [under] by Pa.R.A.P. 1702 (stay ancillary to
appeal) as a prerequisite to an application for a stay or similar relief.

Paragraph (c)—An acknowledgement of service may be executed by
an individual other than the person served, e.g., by a clerk or other responsible person.

Paragraph (d)—With respect to appearances by new counsel following the initial
docketing of appearances pursuant to paragraph (d) of this rule, please note the
requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 120 (entry of appearance).

Paragraph (e)—Paragraph (e) of the rule does not apply to the filing of a notice of
appeal, a petition for allowance of appeal, a petition for permission to appeal, or a
petition for reconsideration or reargument, since under these rules the time for filing
such papers runs from the entry and service of the related order, nor to the filing of a
petition for review or a petition for specialized review, which [is] are governed by
similar considerations. The amendments to Pa.R.A.P. 903(b), 1113(b), and 1512(a)(2)
clarified that paragraph (e) does apply to calculating the deadline for filing cross-
appeals, cross-petitions for allowance of appeal, and additional petitions for review or
specialized review.

Paragraph (f)—This recognizes the holding in Smith v. Board of Probation and
Parole, 683 A.2d 278, 281 (Pa. 1996) (adopting the prisoner mailbox rule to determine
date of filing of a petition for review). Smith adopted the reasoning of the United States
Supreme Court in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 (1988). See also

7
Commonwealth v. Jones, 700 A.2d 423, 426 (Pa. 1997) (extending prisoner mailbox
rule to filing of a notice of appeal).

Paragraph (g)—The rule on hybrid representation is premised on Commonwealth
v. Ellis, 626 A.2d 1137, 1139-40 (Pa. 1993). See 210 Pa. Code § 65.24. If a pro se
notice of appeal is filed, it will satisfy the timeliness requirement for the filing of a notice
of appeal. Counsel of record will, however, be obligated to prosecute that appeal.
There are four other instances in which pro se documents will be accepted by an
appellate court for filing: a request by the party to change or remove counsel; a
response to counsel’s request to withdraw; a complaint that existing counsel has
abandoned the party; and a pro se petition for nunc pro tunc permission to file a petition
for allowance of appeal under Pa.R.A.P. 1113(d). All other documents will be noted on
the docket as received by the appellate court prothonotary’s office but will not be
accepted for filing; instead, the pro se document will be forwarded to counsel of record
with, if the court desires, direction for counsel to respond.

8
Rule 301. Requisites for an Appealable Order.

(a) Entry upon docket below.

(1) Except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this [subdivision]
paragraph, no order of a court shall be appealable until it has been entered upon
the appropriate docket in the [lower] trial court. Where under the applicable
practice below an order is entered in two or more dockets, the order has been
entered for the purposes of appeal when it has been entered in the first
appropriate docket.

(2) In a criminal case in which no post-sentence motion has been filed,
a judgment of sentence is appealable upon the imposition of sentence in open
court.

(b) Separate document required.—Every order shall be set forth on a
separate document.

(c) Nonappealable orders.—Except as provided in [subdivision]
subparagraph (a)(2), a direction by the [lower court]trial court or other government
unit that a specified judgment, sentence or other order shall be entered,
unaccompanied by actual entry of the specified order in the docket, does not constitute
an appealable order. Any such order shall be docketed before an appeal is taken.

(d) Entry of appealable orders.—Subject to any inconsistent general rule
applicable to particular classes of matters, the clerk of the [lower] trial court shall, on
[praecipe] praecipe of any party (except a party who by law may not [praecipe]
praecipe for entry of an adverse order), forthwith prepare, sign, and enter an
appropriate order, judgment, or final decree in the docket, evidencing any action from
which an appeal lies either as of right or upon permission to appeal or allowance of
appeal or by petition for specialized review.

(e) Emergency appeals.—Where the exigency of the case is such as to impel
an immediate appeal and the party intending to appeal an adverse action is unable to
secure the formal entry of an appealable order pursuant to the usual procedures, the
party may file in the [lower] trial court and serve a [praecipe] praecipe for entry of an
adverse order, which action shall constitute entry of an appealable order for the
purposes of these rules. The interlocutory or final nature of the action shall not be
affected by this [subdivision] paragraph.

Official Note: [See Rules of Appellate Procedure] See Pa.R.A.P. 311 authorizing
interlocutory appeals as of right, 312 authorizing interlocutory appeals by permission,
313 authorizing appeals from collateral orders, and 341 to [843] 343 authorizing
appeals from final orders.

9
 [See also Rules of Appellate Procedure] See also Pa.R.A.P. 903 governing
time for filing notice of appeal, 1113 governing time for filing petition for allowance of
appeal, 1311(b) governing time for filing petition for permission for appeal, [and] 1512
governing time for filing petition for review, and 1602(a) governing time for filing
specialized petition for review.

The 1986 [A]amendment to [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 301 state[s]d that no order shall
be appealable until entered in the docket and delete[s]d reference to reduction of an
order to judgment as a prerequisite for appeal in every case. This deletion does not
eliminate the requirement of reduction of an order to judgment in an appropriate case.
Due to the variety of orders issued by courts in different kinds of cases, no single rule
can delineate the requirements applicable in all cases. [The bar is cautioned that if] If
the applicable practice or case law requires that an order be reduced to judgment or
final decree before it becomes final, that requirement must still be met before the order
can be appealed, and parties are cautioned that an appellate court may remand or
take other steps under Pa.R.A.P. 902 if the prerequisites are not satisfied.
Pa.R.C.P. 3021 sets forth the orders that the prothonotary is to enter in the
judgment index and Pa.R.C.P. 227.4 provides a mechanism for parties to praecipe
for judgment in certain circumstances. See also Pa.R.C.P. 236 and 237.

[An appeal may be remanded or subject to other appropriate action of the
appellate court when the order is such that it may be reduced to judgment or final
decree and entered in the docket but such action has not been taken. Rule 902.
Examples of orders which may be remanded under Rule 902 when the order
appealed from has not been reduced to judgment or final decree include:

1. an order denying a motion for a new trial or judgment
notwithstanding the verdict after a trial by jury, Dennis v. Smith, 288 Pa.Super.
185, 431 A.2d 350 (1981);

2. an order dismissing exceptions to the decision after a trial without
jury, Black Top Paving Co., Inc. v. John Carlo, Inc., 292 Pa.Super. 404, 437 A.2d
446 (1981); and

3. an order dismissing exceptions to the decree nisi in an equity action,
Kopchak v. Springer, 292 Pa.Super. 441, 437 A.2d 756 (1981).

An appeal will also be quashed where the order appealed from is
interlocutory and the appeal is not authorized by Rule 311 governing
interlocutory appeals as of right or Rule 312 governing interlocutory appeals by
permission. Examples of interlocutory orders include:

10
 1. an order granting a petition for appointment of an arbitrator, Cassidy
v. Keystone Ins. Co., 297 Pa.Super. 421, 443 A.2d 1193 (1982); and

2. an order relating to alimony pendente lite, and interim counsel fees
and expenses is not appealable. Fried v. Fried, 509 Pa. 89, 501 A.2d 211 (1985).
Subdivision (a) extends former Supreme Court Rule 19A and former
Commonwealth Court Rule 29A to the Superior Court. The second sentence of
the subdivision codifies Stotsenburg v. Frost, 465 Pa. 187, 348 A.2d 418 (1975).

The requirement of Subdivision (b) for a separate document is patterned
after Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 58, as interpreted in United States v. Indrelunas, 411
U.S. 216, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202 (1973), so as to render certain the date on
which an order is entered for purposes of computing the running of the time for
appeal. See also Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 98 S.Ct. 1117, 55
L.Ed.2d 357 (1978) (requirement of separate document may be waived by
appellee). This requirement is intended to control over any inconsistent civil
(including orphans' court) or criminal procedural rule, since such rules are not
primarily concerned with the appellate process.

Subdivision (c) sets forth the frequently overlooked requirement for an
appealable order that an order must be docketed before it may be appealed. The
subdivision also sets forth the rule that an appeal is premature where the Court
directs that a judgment sentence or order be entered in the docket and the
prothonotary fails to do so. Friedman v. Kasser, 293 Pa.Super 294, 438 A.2d 1001
(1981). Moreover, an order of Court then directing that a complaint as set forth
will be dismissed upon the passage of time or occurrence or failure of an event is
not appealable; only a subsequent order of dismissal would be appealable. See
Ayre v. Mountaintop Area Joint San. Auth., 58 Pa.Cmwlth. 510, 427 A.2d 1294
(1981).

This rule does not supersede rules such as Pa.R.Civ.P. 237 which impose
additional requirements or procedures in connection with filing a praecipe for a
final order.

Subdivision (d) provides a remedy for the appellant where no appealable
order has been entered on the docket, and is similar to Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.4. The
exception refers to cases such as certain matrimonial matters, where it has been
held that the defendant is not entitled to cause an adverse decision to be formally
entered as judgment. See, e.g., Mirarchi v. Mirarchi, 226 Pa.Super. 53, 311 A.2d
698 (1973).]

The filing in the [lower] trial court required by [Subdivision] paragraph (e) may
[under Rule 121(a) (filing) be made with a judge of the lower court in connection

11
with] be accompanied by an application to the trial court for relief such as a stay or
supersedeas under Chapter 17 [(effect of appeals, supersedeas and stays)].

[See]See Pa.R.A.P. 108(d) [and Explanatory Comment--2007 thereto],
Pa.R.A.P. 903(c)(3), and Pa.R.Crim.P. 462(G), 720, and 721 governing criminal
appeals.

12
Rule 313. Collateral Orders.

(a) General [R]rule.—An appeal may be taken as of right from a collateral
order of a[n administrative agency or lower] trial court or other government unit.

(b) Definition.—A collateral order is an order separable from and collateral to
the main cause of action where the right involved is too important to be denied review
and the question presented is such that if review is postponed until final judgment in the
case, the claim will be irreparably lost.

Official Note: If an order meets the definition of a collateral order, it is appealed
by filing a notice of appeal or petition for review.

[Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 313 is a codification of existing case law with respect to
collateral orders. See Pugar v. Greco, [483 Pa. 68, 73,] 394 A.2d 542, 545 (Pa. 1978)
(quoting Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)). [Examples
of collateral orders include orders denying pre-trial motions to dismiss based on
double jeopardy in which the court does not find the motion frivolous,
Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 336, 508 A.2d 286, 289-91 (1986) (allowing
an immediate appeal from denial of double jeopardy claim under collateral order
doctrine where trial court does not make a finding of frivolousness); if the trial
court finds the motion frivolous, the defendant may secure review only by first
filing a petition for review under Pa.R.A.P. 1573. See Commonwealth v. Orie, 22
A.3d 1021(Pa. 2011).]

[Other examples of collateral orders are an order denying a petition to
permit the payment of death taxes, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa. Super. 442, 487 A.2d
1363 (1985); and an order denying a petition for removal of an executor, Re:
Estate of Georgianna, 312 Pa. Super. 339, 458 A.2d 989 (1983), aff'd, 504 Pa. 510,
475 A.2d 744. Thorough discussions of the collateral order doctrine as it has
been applied by Pennsylvania appellate courts are found in the following
sources:] Pennsylvania appellate courts have found a number of classes of
orders to fit the collateral order definition. Collateral order cases are collected
and discussed in Darlington, McKeon, Schuckers and Brown, [1] Pennsylvania
Appellate Practice [Second] 2015-2016 Edition, §§ 313:1-313:201 [(1994) and Byer,
Appealable Orders under the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedures in
Practice and Procedures in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts (PBI No. 1994-869);
Pines, Pennsylvania Appellate Practice: Procedural Requirements and the
Vagaries of Jurisdiction, 91 Dick.L.Rev. 55, 107-115 (1986).] Examples include an
order denying a petition to permit the payment of death taxes, Hankin v. Hankin,
487 A.2d 1363 (Pa. Super. 1985), and an order denying a petition for removal of an
executor, Re: Estate of Georgiana, 458 A.2d 989 (Pa. Super. 1983), aff’d, 475 A.2d
744 (Pa. 1984), and an order denying a pre-trial motion to dismiss on double

13
jeopardy grounds if the trial court does not also make a finding that the motion to
dismiss is frivolous. See Commonwealth v. Brady, 508 A.2d 286, 289-91 (Pa.
1986) (allowing an immediate appeal from denial of double jeopardy claim
under collateral order doctrine where trial court does not make a finding of
frivolousness); Commonwealth v. Orie, 22 A.3d 1021 (Pa. 2011). An order denying
a pre-trial motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds that also finds that the
motion to dismiss is frivolous is not appealable as of right as a collateral order,
but may be appealable by permission under Pa.R.A.P. 1311(a)(3).

[If an order falls under Rule 313, an immediate appeal may be taken as of
right simply by filing a notice of appeal. The procedures set forth in Rules 341(c)
and 1311 do not apply under Rule 313.]

14
Rule 341. Final Orders; Generally.

(a) General [R]rule.—Except as prescribed in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
rule, an appeal may be taken as of right from any final order of a government unit or trial
court.

(b) Definition of [F]final [O]order.—A final order is any order that:

(1) disposes of all claims and of all parties; or

(2) (Rescinded).

(3) is entered as a final order pursuant to paragraph (c) of this rule.

(c) Determination of finality.—When more than one claim for relief is
presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party
claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the trial court or other government unit may
enter a final order as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims and parties only
upon an express determination that an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of
the entire case. Such an order becomes appealable when entered. In the absence of
such a determination and entry of a final order, any order or other form of decision that
adjudicates fewer than all the claims and parties shall not constitute a final order. In
addition, the following conditions shall apply:

(1) [The trial court or other government unit is required to act on
an application for a determination of finality under paragraph (c) within 30
days of entry of the order.] An application for a determination of
finality under paragraph (c) must be filed within 30 days of entry of the
order. During the time an application for a determination of finality is pending,
the action is stayed.

(2) [A notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after entry of an
order as amended unless a shorter time period is provided in Pa.R.A.P.
903(c). Any denial of such an application shall be reviewable only for
abuse of discretion pursuant to Chapter 15] Unless the trial court or other
government unit acts on the application within 30 days after it is filed,
the trial court or other government unit shall no longer consider the
application and it shall be deemed denied.

(3) [Unless the trial court or other government unit acts on the
application within 30 days of entry of the order, the trial court or other
government unit shall no longer consider the application and it shall be
deemed denied.] A notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after entry

15
 of an order as amended unless a shorter time period is provided in
Pa.R.A.P. 903(c). Any denial of such an application is reviewable only
through a petition for permission to appeal under Pa.R.A.P. 1311.

[(4) The time for filing a petition for review will begin to run from
the date of entry of the order denying the application for a determination of
finality or, if the application is deemed denied, from the 31st day. A petition
for review may be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order denying the
application or within 30 days of the deemed denial unless a shorter time
period is provided by Pa.R.A.P. 1512(b).]

(d) Superior Court and Commonwealth Court [O]orders.—Except as
prescribed by Pa.R.A.P. 1101 no appeal may be taken as of right from any final order of
the Superior Court or of the Commonwealth Court.

(e) Criminal [O]orders.—An appeal may be taken by the Commonwealth from
any final order in a criminal matter only in the circumstances provided by law.

Official Note: Related Constitutional and [S]statutory [P]provisions—Section 9 of Article
V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania provides that ‘‘there shall be a right of appeal from
a court of record or from an administrative agency to a court of record or to an appellate
court.’’ The constitutional provision is implemented by 2 Pa.C.S. § 702, 2 Pa.C.S. § 752,
and 42 Pa.C.S. § 5105.

Criminal [L]law [P]proceedings—Commonwealth [A]appeals—Orders that do
not dispose of the entire case that were formerly appealable [under Pa.R.A.P. 341]
by the Commonwealth in criminal cases under Pa.R.A.P. 341 [as heretofore provided
by law, but which do not dispose of the entire case,] are [now] appealable as
interlocutory appeals as of right under paragraph (d) of Pa.R.A.P. 311.

Final [O]orders—[P]pre-and [P]post-1992 Practice—The 1992 amendment
generally eliminate[s]d appeals as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 341 from orders that do not
end[ing] the litigation as to all claims and as to all parties. [Formerly, there was case
law that orders not ending the litigation as to all claims and all parties are final
orders if such orders have the practical consequence of putting a litigant out of
court.] Prior to 1992, there were cases that deemed an order final if it had the
practical effect of putting a party out of court, even if the order did not end the
litigation as to all claims and all parties.

A party needs to file only a single notice of appeal to secure review of prior non-
final orders that are made final by the entry of a final order, see K.H. v. J.R., 826 A.2d
863, 870-71 (Pa. 2003) (following trial); Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC, 44 A.3d 27, 54 (Pa.
2012) (summary judgment). Where, however, one or more orders resolves issues

16
arising on more than one docket or relating to more than one judgment, separate
notices of appeal must be filed. Malanchuk v. Tsimura, 137 A.3d 1283, 1288 (Pa.
2016) (“[C]omplete consolidation (or merger or fusion of actions) does not occur
absent a complete identity of parties and claims; separate actions lacking such
overlap retain their separate identities and require distinct judgments”);
Commonwealth v. C.M.K., 932 A.2d 111, 113 & n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007) (quashing appeal
taken by single notice of appeal from order on remand for consideration under
Pa.R.Crim.P. 607 of two persons’ judgments of sentence).

The 1997 amendments to paragraphs (a) and (c), substituting the conjunction
‘‘and’’ for ‘‘or,’’ are not substantive. The amendments merely clarify that by definition
any order [which] that disposes of all claims will dispose of all parties and any order
that disposes of all parties will dispose of all claims.

Rescission of subparagraph (b)(2)—Former subparagraph (b)(2) provided for
appeals of orders defined as final by statute. The 2015 rescission of subparagraph
(b)(2) eliminated a potential waiver trap created by legislative use of the adjective “final”
to describe orders that were procedurally interlocutory but nonetheless designated as
appealable as of right. Failure to appeal immediately an interlocutory order deemed
final by statute waived the right to challenge the order on appeal from the final
judgment. Rescinding subparagraph (b)(2) eliminated this potential waiver of the right
to appeal. If an order designated as appealable by a statute disposes of all claims and
of all parties, it is appealable as a final order pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341. If the order
does not meet that standard, then it is interlocutory regardless of the statutory
description. Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(8) provides for appeal as of right from an order that is
made final or appealable by statute or general rule, even though the order does not
dispose of all claims or of all parties and, thus, is interlocutory[;]. Pa.R.A.P. 311(g)
addresses waiver if no appeal is taken immediately from such interlocutory order.

One of the further effects of the rescission of subparagraph (b)(2) is to change
the basis for appealability of orders that do not end the case but grant or deny a
declaratory judgment. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wickett, 763 A.2d 813, 818 (Pa.
2000); Pa. Bankers Ass’n v. Pa. Dep’t[.] of Banking, 948 A.2d 790, 798 (Pa. 2008). The
effect of the rescission is to eliminate waiver for failure to take an immediate appeal
from such an order. A party aggrieved by an interlocutory order granting or denying a
declaratory judgment, where the order satisfies the criteria for “finality” under
Pennsylvania Bankers Association, may elect to proceed under Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(8) or
wait until the end of the case and proceed under subparagraph (b)(1) of this rule.

An arbitration order appealable under 42 Pa.C.S. § 7320(a) may be interlocutory
or final. If it disposes of all claims and all parties, it is final, and, thus, appealable
pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341. If the order does not dispose of all claims and all parties,
that is, the order is not final, but rather interlocutory, it is appealable pursuant to

17
Pa.R.A.P. 311. Failure to appeal an interlocutory order appealable as of right may
result in waiver of objections to the order. See Pa.R.A.P. 311(g).

Paragraph (c)—Determination of [F]finality—Paragraph (c) permits an immediate
appeal from an order dismissing less than all claims or parties from a case only upon an
express determination that an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of the entire
case. Factors to be considered under paragraph (c) include, but are not limited to:

(1) whether there is a significant relationship between adjudicated and
unadjudicated claims;

(2) whether there is a possibility that an appeal would be mooted by
further developments;

(3) whether there is a possibility that the court or government unit will
consider issues a second time; and

(4) whether an immediate appeal will enhance prospects of settlement.

The failure of a party to apply to the government unit or trial court for a
determination of finality pursuant to paragraph (c) shall not constitute a waiver and the
matter may be raised in a subsequent appeal following the entry of a final order
disposing of all claims and all parties.

Where the government unit or trial court refuses to amend its order to include the
express determination that an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of the entire
case and refuses to enter a final order, a petition for [review] permission to appeal
under [Chapter 15] Pa.R.A.P. 1311 of the unappealable order of denial is the exclusive
mode of review [to determine whether the case is so egregious as to justify
prerogative appellate correction of the exercise of discretion by the lower
tribunal. See, e.g., Pa.R.A.P. 1311, Official Note]. The filing of such a petition [for
review] does not prevent the trial court or other government unit from proceeding
further with the matter pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(6). Of course, as in any case, the
appellant [could] may apply for a discretionary stay of the proceeding below.

Subparagraph (c)(2) provides for a stay of the action pending determination of an
application for a determination of finality. If the application is denied, and a petition
for [review] permission to appeal is filed challenging the denial, a stay or
supersedeas will issue only as provided under Chapter 17 of these rules.

In the event that a trial court or other government unit enters a final order
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this rule, the trial court or other government unit may no
longer proceed further in the matter, except as provided in Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(1)-(5).

18
 [The following is a partial list of orders previously interpreted by the courts
as appealable as final orders under Pa.R.A.P. 341 that are no longer appealable as
of right unless the trial court or government unit makes an express determination
that an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of the entire case and
expressly enters a final order pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c):

(1) an order dismissing one of several causes of action pleaded in
a complaint but leaving pending other causes of action;

(2) an order dismissing a complaint but leaving pending a
counterclaim;

(3) an order dismissing a counterclaim but leaving pending the
complaint that initiated the action;

(4) an order dismissing an action as to less than all plaintiffs or as
to less than all defendants but leaving pending the action as to other
plaintiffs and other defendants;

(5) an order granting judgment against one defendant but leaving
pending the complaint against other defendants; and

(6) an order dismissing a complaint to join an additional
defendant or denying a petition to join an additional defendant or denying a
petition for late joinder of an additional defendant.

The 1997 amendment adding subparagraph (c)(3) provided for a deemed
denial where the trial court or other government unit fails to act on the application
within 30 days.]

19
Rule 502. Substitution of Parties.

(a) Death of a party.—If a party dies after a notice of appeal or petition for
review is filed or while a matter is otherwise pending in an appellate court, the personal
representative of the deceased party may be substituted as a party on application filed
by the representative or by any party with the prothonotary of the appellate court. The
application of a party shall be served upon the representative in accordance with the
provisions of [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 123 [(applications for relief)]. If the deceased party has
no representative, any party may suggest the death on the record and proceedings shall
then be had as the appellate court may direct. If a party against whom an appeal may
be taken or a petition for review may be filed dies after entry of an order below but
before a notice of appeal or petition for review is filed, an appellant may proceed as if
death had not occurred. After the notice of appeal or petition for review is filed,
substitution shall be effected in the appellate court in accordance with this
[subdivision] paragraph. If a party entitled to appeal or petition for review shall die
before filing a notice of appeal or petition for review, the notice of appeal or petition for
review may be filed by his personal representative, or, if he has no personal
representative, by his counsel, within the time prescribed by these rules. After the
notice of appeal or petition for review is filed, substitution shall be effected in the
appellate court in accordance with this [subdivision] paragraph.

(b) Substitution in other cases or for other causes.—If substitution of a party
in an appellate court is necessary in connection with a petition for allowance of appeal,
[or] a petition for permission to appeal, a petition for specialized review, or in
connection with any [other] matter other than a notice of appeal or petition for review,
or if substitution of a party in an appellate court is necessary for any reason other than
death, substitution shall be effected in accordance with the procedure prescribed in
[Subdivision] paragraph (a) of this rule.

(c) Death or separation from office of public officer.--When a public officer is a
party to an appeal or other matter in an appellate court in his official capacity and during
its pendency dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office, the matter does not abate
and his successor is automatically substituted as a party. Proceedings following the
substitution shall be in the name of the substituted party, but any misnomer not affecting
the substantial rights of the parties shall be disregarded. An order of substitution may
be entered at any time, but the omission to enter such an order shall not affect the
substitution.

Official Note: Pa.R.C[iv].P. 2351 to 237[5]4 relate to substitution of parties in the courts
of common pleas, but this rule, which is patterned after [Fed. Rules App.Proc.] Fed. R.
App. P. 43[(a), (b) and (c)(1)], covers the subject in the appellate courts for the first
time.

20
Rule 553. Application in Appellate Court.

(a) General rule.—A party who has been denied relief under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P.
552 [(application to lower court for leave to appeal in forma pauperis)], or who has
been unable to file an application under such rule because the matter is an original
action in the appellate court, or a petition for review or petition for specialized review
proceeding relating to a government unit other than a court, or for any other reason,
may apply to the appellate court for leave to proceed [in forma pauperis] in forma
pauperis in the appellate court.

(b) Form and procedure.—An application under this rule shall be governed by
[Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 552 so far as it may be applied.

Official Note: [See former Supreme Court Rule 61(d), which required an affidavit
(verified statement) in all cases.] Unlike the prior rule, this rule makes clear that [the]
an application may be [renewed] made in the appellate court even if it has been
denied in the trial court.

21
Rule 701. Interlocutory Orders.

An appeal authorized by law from an interlocutory order [in a matter] shall be
taken to, and petitions for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order [in a matter]
and petitions for specialized review shall be filed in, the appellate court having
jurisdiction of final orders in such matters.

Official Note: Based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(a) [(appeals authorized by law)].

22
Rule 702. Final Orders.

(a) General rule.—An appeal authorized by law from a final order shall be
taken to, and petitions for allowance of appeal from a final order shall be filed in, the
appellate court vested by law with jurisdiction over appeals from such order.

(b) Matters tried with capital offenses.—If an appeal is taken to the Supreme
Court under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1941 (review of death sentences), any other appeals
relating to sentences for lesser offenses imposed on a defendant as a result of the
same criminal episode or transaction and tried with the capital offense shall also be
taken to the Supreme Court.

(c) Supervision of special prosecutions or investigations.—All petitions for
specialized review under [Rule 3331] Pa.R.A.P. 1611 [(review of special
prosecutions or investigations)] shall be filed in the Supreme Court.

Official Note: [Because of frequent legislative modifications it is not desirable to
attempt at this time to restate appellate court jurisdiction in these rules.
However, the] The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts publishes from time to
time at 204 Pa. Code § 201.2 an unofficial chart of the Unified Judicial System showing
the appellate jurisdiction of the several courts of this Commonwealth, and it is expected
that the several publishers of these rules will include a copy of the current version of
such chart in their respective publications.

[Subdivisions] Paragraphs (b) and (c) are based upon 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(1)
(direct appeals from courts of common pleas). Under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 751, [(transfer
of erroneously filed cases)] an appeal from a lesser offense improvidently taken to the
Superior Court or the Commonwealth Court will be transferred to the Supreme Court for
consideration and decision with the capital offense.

Under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 701, [(interlocutory orders)] the jurisdiction described
in [Subdivision] paragraph (c) extends also to interlocutory orders. [See Rule] See
Pa.R.A.P. 102 [(definitions)] where the term "appeal" includes proceedings on petition
for review and petitions for specialized review. Ordinarily [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 701 will
have no application to matters within the scope of [Subdivision] paragraph (b), since
that [subdivision] paragraph is contingent upon entry of a final order in the form of a
sentence of death; the mere possibility of such a sentence is not [intended to give the]
a basis for Supreme Court direct appellate jurisdiction over interlocutory orders in
homicide and related cases, [since generally a death sentence is not imposed],
because it is the imposition of the sentence of death that triggers Supreme Court
direct review. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(h).

23
Rule 901. Scope of Chapter.

This chapter applies to all appeals from a trial court to an appellate court except:

(1) An appeal by allowance taken under 42 Pa.C.S. § 724 (allowance of
appeals from Superior and Commonwealth Courts). [See Rule] See Pa.R.A.P. 1112
[(appeals by allowance)].

(2) An appeal by permission taken [under 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory
appeals by permission). See Rule 1311 (interlocutory appeals by permission)]
pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311.

(3) An appeal [which may be] taken by petition for specialized review
pursuant to [Rule 1762(b)(2), which governs applications relating to bail when no
appeal is pending] Chapter 16.

[(4) An appeal which may be taken by petition for review pursuant to
Rule 1770, which governs out of home placement in juvenile delinquency
matters.]

[(5)](4) Automatic review of sentences pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(h)
(review of death sentence). [See Rule] See Pa.R.A.P. 1941 [(review of death
sentences)].

[(6) An appeal which may be taken by petition for review pursuant to
Rule 3331 (review of special prosecutions or investigations).

(7) An appeal which may be taken only by a petition for review pursuant
to Rule 1573, which governs review when a trial court has denied a motion to
dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy as frivolous.]

24
Rule 1311. Interlocutory Appeals by Permission.

(a) General rule.--An appeal may be taken by permission from an
interlocutory order:

(1) certified under 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) or for which certification
pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) was denied; see Pa.R.A.P. 312;
[(interlocutory appeals by permission) from any interlocutory order of
a trial court or other government unit. See Pa.R.A.P. 312 (interlocutory
appeals by permission).]

(2) for which certification pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c) was
denied; or

(3) that determined that a defendant’s motion to dismiss on the
basis of double jeopardy is frivolous.

(b) Petition for permission to appeal.—Permission to appeal from an
interlocutory order listed in paragraph (a) [containing the statement prescribed by
42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b)] may be sought by filing a petition for permission to appeal with the
prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after entry of such order or the date
of deemed denial in the trial court or other government unit with proof of service on all
other parties to the matter in the trial court or other government unit and on the
government unit or clerk of the trial court, who shall file the petition of record in such trial
court. An application for an amendment of an interlocutory order to set forth expressly
either the statement specified in 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) or the one in Pa.R.A.P. 341(c)
shall be filed with the trial court or other government unit within 30 days after the entry
of such interlocutory order, and permission to appeal may be sought within 30 days
after entry of the order as amended. Unless the trial court or other government unit acts
on the application within 30 days after it is filed, the trial court or other government unit
shall no longer consider the application and it shall be deemed denied. If the petition for
permission to appeal is transmitted to the prothonotary of the appellate court by means
of first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail, the petition shall be
deemed received by the prothonotary for the purposes of Pa.R.A.P. 121(a) (filing) on
the date deposited in the United States mail, as shown on a United States Postal
Service Form 3817 Certificate of Mailing, or other similar United States Postal Service
form from which the date of deposit can be verified. The certificate of mailing or other
similar Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be
cancelled by the Postal Service, shall show the docket number of the matter in the trial
court or other government unit, and shall be either enclosed with the petition or
separately mailed to the prothonotary. The petitioner must file the original and one
copy. Upon actual receipt of the petition for permission to appeal, the prothonotary of
the appellate court shall immediately stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date,

25
or the date of earlier deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this paragraph,
shall constitute the date when permission to appeal was sought, which date shall be
shown on the docket. The prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately note
the appellate docket number assignment upon the petition for permission to appeal and
give notice of the docket number assignment to the government unit or clerk of the trial
court, to the petitioner, and to the other persons named in the proof of service
accompanying the petition.

(c) Fee.—The petitioner upon filing the petition for permission to appeal shall
pay any fee therefor prescribed by Chapter 27 (fees and costs in appellate courts and
on appeal).

(d) Entry of appearance.—Upon the acceptance for filing of the petition for
permission to appeal, the prothonotary of the appellate court shall note on the record as
counsel for the petitioner the name of counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the
petition for permission to appeal, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any,
named in the proof of service. Unless that party is entitled by law to be represented by
counsel on a petition for permission to appeal, the prothonotary shall upon praecipe of
any such counsel for other parties, filed at any time within 30 days after filing of the
petition, strike off or correct the record of appearance. If entry of appearance in the trial
court extends through appeals, counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn
without leave of court. Leave of court to withdraw is also required for any other counsel
who have not filed a praecipe to correct appearance within the first 30 days after the
petition is docketed, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an
appearance for the party.

Official Note: [Based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission).
See note to Pa.R.A.P. 903 (time for appeal). Compare 42 Pa.C.S. § 5574 (effect of
application for amendment to qualify for interlocutory appeal).] Pa.R.A.P. 1311
originally implemented only 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by
permission). The accompanying note provided that an order refusing to certify
an order as meeting the requirements of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) was reviewed by
filing of a petition for review under Chapter 15. The rule was amended in 2020 to
expand the use of a petition for permission to appeal to requests for review of
interlocutory orders that were not certified for immediate review pursuant to 42
Pa.C.S. § 702(b) or Pa.R.A.P. 341(c) and of interlocutory orders that found a
criminal defendant’s claim that further proceedings would cause the defendant to
be placed in double jeopardy to be frivolous.

[See] See the Official Note to Pa.R.A.P. 1112 (appeals by allowance) for an
explanation of the procedure when Form 3817 or other similar United States Postal
Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified is used.

26
 [Where the government unit or trial court refuses to amend its order to
include the prescribed statement, a petition for review under Chapter 15 of the
unappealable order of denial is the proper mode of determining whether the case
is so egregious as to justify prerogative appellate correction of the exercise of
discretion by the lower tribunal. If the petition for review is granted in such a
case, the effect (as in the Federal practice under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)) is the same
as if a petition for permission to appeal had been filed and granted, and no
separate petition for permission to appeal need be filed.

The 1997 amendment to paragraph (b) provides for a deemed denial where
the trial court or other government unit fails to act on the application within 30
days. Under such circumstances, a party may need to file a praecipe for entry of
the deemed denial pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 301(d).]

The Rules of Criminal Procedure require counsel appointed by the trial court to
continue representation through direct appeal. Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(A)(4) and
Pa.R.Crim.P. 122(B)(2). Similarly, the Rules of Criminal Procedure require counsel
appointed in post-conviction proceedings to continue representation throughout the
proceedings, including any appeal from the disposition of the petition for post-conviction
collateral relief. Pa.R.Crim.P. 904(F)(2) and Pa.R.Crim.P. 904(H)(2)(b). The same is
true when counsel enters an appearance on behalf of a juvenile in a delinquency matter
or on behalf of a child or other party in a dependency matter. Pa.R.J.C.P. 150(B), 151,
Pa.R.J.C.P. 1150(B), 1151(B), (E). It would be rare for counsel in such cases to
consider withdrawing by praecipe, but the 2020 amendment to the rule avoids any
possibility of confusion by clarifying that withdrawal by praecipe is available only in
matters that do not otherwise require court permission to withdraw.

With respect to appearances by new counsel following the initial docketing of
appearances pursuant to paragraph (d) of this rule, please note the requirements of
Pa.R.A.P. 120.

27
Rule 1312. Content of the Petition for Permission to Appeal.

(a) General rule.--The petition for permission to appeal need not be set forth
in numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the following
(which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):

(1) A statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate court.

(2) The text of the order in question, or the portions thereof sought to
be reviewed, the text of any order ruling on any subsequent request for
certification, [(including the statement by the trial court or other
government unit that the order involves a controlling question of law as to
which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an
immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate
termination of the matter),] and the date of [its] their entry in the trial court or
other government unit. If the order(s) [is] are voluminous, it may, if more
convenient, be appended to the petition.

(3) A concise statement of the case containing the facts necessary to
an understanding of the [controlling questions of law determined by the]
basis for the order of the trial court or other government unit.

(4) The [controlling] proposed questions [of law] presented for
review, expressed in the terms and circumstances of the case but without
unnecessary detail. The statement of questions presented will be deemed to
include every subsidiary question fairly comprised therein. Only the questions
set forth in the petition, or fairly comprised therein, will ordinarily be considered
by the court in the event permission to appeal is granted.

(5) A concise statement of the reasons for an immediate appeal:
[why a substantial ground exists for a difference of opinion on the
questions and why an immediate appeal may materially advance the
termination of the matter.]

(i) For a petition for permission to appeal an order certified
pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b), a statement of the reasons why the
order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a
substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an appeal from
the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the
matter;

(ii) For a petition for permission to appeal an order for
which certification pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) was denied or

28
 deemed denied, a statement of reasons why the order involves a
controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground
for difference of opinion, that an appeal from the order may
materially advance the ultimate termination of the matter, and why
the refusal of certification was an abuse of the trial court’s or other
government unit’s discretion that is so egregious as to justify
prerogative appellate correction;

(iii) For a petition for permission to appeal an order for
which certification pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c) was denied or
deemed denied, the petition must contain a statement of reasons
why an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of the entire
case and why the refusal of certification was an abuse of the trial
court’s or other government unit’s discretion that is so egregious as
to justify prerogative appellate correction;

(iv) For a petition for permission to appeal pursuant to
Pa.R.A.P. 1311(a)(3), the petition must set forth why the claim of
double jeopardy is colorable.

(6) There shall be appended to the petition a copy of any opinions
delivered relating to the order sought to be reviewed, as well as all opinions of
trial courts or other government units in the case, and, if reference thereto is
necessary to ascertain the grounds of the order, opinions in companion cases. If
whatever is required by this paragraph to be appended to the petition is
voluminous, it may, if more convenient, be separately presented.

(7) There shall be appended to the petition the verbatim texts of the
pertinent provisions of constitutional provisions, statutes, ordinances, regulations,
or other similar enactments which the case involves, and the citation to the
volume and page where they are published, including the official edition, if any.

(8) The certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(b) Caption and parties.--All parties to the proceeding in the trial court or other
government unit other than petitioner shall be named as respondents, but respondents
who support the position of the petitioner shall meet the time schedule for filing papers
which is prescribed in this chapter for the petitioner, except that any response by such
respondents to the petition shall be filed as promptly as possible after receipt of the
petition.

(c) No supporting brief.--All contentions in support of a petition for permission
to appeal shall be set forth in the body of the petition as prescribed under subparagraph

29
(a)(5). Neither the briefs below nor any separate brief in support of a petition for
permission to appeal will be received, and the prothonotary of the appellate court will
refuse to file any petition for permission to appeal to which is annexed or appended any
brief below or supporting brief.

(d) Essential requisites of petition.--The failure of a petitioner to present with
accuracy, brevity, and clearness whatever is essential to a ready and adequate
understanding of the points requiring consideration will be a sufficient reason for
denying the petition.

(e) Multiple petitioners.--Where permitted by Pa.R.A.P. 512 [(joint appeals)],
multiple petitioners may file a single petition for permission to appeal [may be filed].

[Official Note: Based on former Commonwealth Court Rule 114,
subparagraph (a)(2) of this rule makes clear that the order of the tribunal below
must contain a statement that the order involves a controlling question of law as
to which there is a difference of opinion. Interlocutory appeals as of right may be
taken by filing a notice of appeal under Chapter 9, rather than by petition under
this rule. See Pa.R.A.P. 311.]

30
Rule 1316. Incorrect Use of Petition for Permission to Appeal [or Petition for
Review].

(a) General Rule.—The appellate court shall treat a request for discretionary
review of an order [which] that is immediately appealable as a notice of appeal [under
the following circumstances:] if a party has filed a timely petition for permission
to appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311.

[(1) where a party has filed a timely petition for permission to
appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311; or

(2) where a party has filed a timely petition for review from a trial
court’s refusal of a timely application pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311 to amend
the order to set forth expressly the statement specified in 42 Pa.C.S.
§ 702(b).]

(b) Additional Requirements.—The appellate court may require any additional
actions necessary to perfect the appeal.

Official Note: This [R]rule requires the appellate court to treat a timely[, but
erroneous,] petition for permission to appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311 from an order
[which is, in fact,] that is instead immediately appealable as of right[,] as a timely
notice of appeal. [See Commonwealth v. Shull, 811 A.2d 1 (Pa.Super. 2002).] This
[R]rule supersedes Thermo-Guard, Inc. v. Cochran, 596 A.2d 188, 192 (Pa. Super.
1991), which stated, as [dictum] dictum, that ‘‘[ . . . in the future,] where a petition for
permission to appeal seeking review of a final order, appealable as of right, or of an
interlocutory order made appealable as of right [. . .] under Pa.R.A.P. 311, is filed, this
court should simply deny the petition.’’ [Also, pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) of this
Rule, where the trial court refuses an application to amend an order to set forth
expressly the statement specified in 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b), and that order was in
fact appealable as of right, the appellate court shall treat a Chapter 15 petition for
review of the trial court’s refusal to amend as a notice of appeal.]

Use of the term ‘‘notice of appeal’’ in this [R]rule is not intended to preclude
treatment of the petition for permission to appeal as a petition for review if the proper
method of appeal as of right would be a petition for review addressed to the
Commonwealth Court’s appellate jurisdiction [found at] pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763.

31
Rule 1323. Denial of Permission to Appeal.

If the petition for permission to appeal is denied, the prothonotary of the appellate
court shall immediately give written notice in person or by first class mail of entry of the
order denying permission to appeal to the government unit or clerk of the [lower] trial
court and to each party who has appeared in the appellate court. A party wishing to
seek review of the denial in the Supreme Court must file a timely petition for
allowance of appeal.

32
Rule 1501. Scope of Chapter.

(a) General rule.—Except as otherwise prescribed by paragraphs
[Subdivisions] (b) and (c) of this rule, this chapter applies to judicial review in:

(1) Appeals from an administrative agency (within the meaning of
Section 9 of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania) to an appellate court or
pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763(b).

(2) Appeals to an appellate court pursuant to 2 Pa.C.S. § 702
[(appeals),] or 42 Pa.C.S. § 5105 [(right to appellate review) or any other
statute providing for judicial review of a determination of a government
unit].

(3) Original jurisdiction actions heretofore cognizable in an appellate
court by actions in the nature of equity, replevin, mandamus or [quo
warranto]quo warranto or for declaratory judgment, or upon writs of
[certiorari]certiorari or prohibition.

(4) [Matters designated by general rule, e.g., review of orders
refusing to certify interlocutory orders for immediate appeal, release prior
to sentence, a]Appeals under Section 17(d) of Article II of the Constitution of
Pennsylvania [and review of special prosecutions or investigations].

(5) Appeals pursuant to Supreme Court general rule, such as
those authorized by 42 Pa.C.S. § 725(2)-(5).

(b) Appeals governed by other provisions of rules.—This chapter does not
apply to any appeal within the scope of:

(1) Chapter 9 [(appeals from lower courts)].

(2) Chapter 11 [(appeals from Commonwealth Court and Superior
Court)].

(3) Chapter 13 [(interlocutory appeals by permission)], except that
the provisions of this chapter and ancillary provisions of these rules applicable to
practice and procedure on petition for review [, so far as they may be applied,]
shall be applicable[: (a) where required by the Note to Rule 341 and the Note
to Rule 1311; and (b)] after permission to appeal has been granted from a
determination which, if final, would be subject to judicial review pursuant to this
chapter.

33
 (4) [Rule 1941 (review of death sentences).] Chapter 16.

(5) Pa.R.A.P. 1941.

(c) Unsuspended statutory procedures.—This chapter does not apply to any
appeal pursuant to the following statutory provisions, which are not suspended by these
rules:

(1) [Section 137 of Title 15 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated
Statutes] 15 Pa.C.S. § 137 (Court to pass upon rejection of documents by
Department of State).

(2) The Pennsylvania Election Code, Act of June 3, 1937, PL. 1333,
as amended, 25 P.S. §§ 2600-3591.

(d) Jurisdiction of courts unaffected.—This chapter does not enlarge or
otherwise modify the jurisdiction and powers of the Commonwealth Court or any other
court.

Official Note: [This chapter applies to review of any ‘‘determination’’ of a
‘‘government unit’’ as defined in Rule 102 assuming, of course, that the subject
matter of the case is within the jurisdiction of a court subject to these rules (see
Subdivision (d) of this rule). A ‘‘determination’’ means ‘‘action or inaction by a
government unit which action or inaction is subject to judicial review by a court
under Section 9 of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania or otherwise. The
term includes an order entered by a government unit.’’ The term ‘‘government
unit’’ is all inclusive and means ‘‘the Governor and the departments, boards,
commissions, officers, authorities and other agencies of the Commonwealth,
including the General Assembly and its officers and agencies and any court or
other officer or agency of the unified judicial system, and any political
subdivision or municipal or other local authority or any officer or agency of any
such political subdivision or local authority. The term includes a board of
arbitrators whose determination is subject to review under 42 Pa.C.S. § 763(b)
(awards of arbitrators).’’ The term ‘‘administrative agency’’ is not defined in these
rules, although the term is used in these rules as a result of its appearance in
Section 9 of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania.

Subdivision (a)(4) was added in 2004 to recognize the references in various
appellate rules and accompanying notes to petition for review practice. For
example, the Notes to Rules 341 and 1311 direct counsel to file a petition for
review of a trial court or government agency order refusing to certify an
interlocutory order for immediate appeal. Similarly, Rule 1762 directs the filing of
a petition for review when a party seeks release on bail before judgment of

34
sentence is rendered, see Rule 1762(b), and Rule 1770 directs the filing of a
petition for review when a juvenile seeks review of placement in a juvenile
delinquency matter. A petition for review is also the proper method by which to
seek judicial review pursuant to Rule 3321 (regarding legislative reapportionment
commission) and Rule 3331 (regarding special prosecutions or investigations).
The 2004 and 2012 amendments clarify the use of petitions for review in these
special situations.

Subdivision (b) of this rule is necessary because otherwise conventional
appeals from a court (which is included in the scope of the term ‘‘government
unit’’) to an appellate court would fall within the scope of this chapter under the
provisions of Paragraph (a)(2) of this rule.

Subdivision (c) expressly recognizes that some statutory procedures are
not replaced by petition for review practice. Thus, matters brought pursuant to
Section 137 of the Associations Code governing judicial review of documents
rejected by the Department of State or pursuant to the Election Code are
controlled by the applicable statutory provisions and not by the rules in Chapter
15. See 15 Pa.C.S. § 137; Act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, as amended 25 P.S.
§§ 2600—3591.

In light of Subdivision (d), where the court in which a petition for review is
filed lacks subject matter jurisdiction (e.g., a petition for review of a local
government question filed in the Commonwealth Court), Rules 741 (waiver of
objections to jurisdiction), 751 (transfer of erroneously filed cases) and 1504
(improvident petitions for review) will be applicable. See also 42 Pa.C.S. § 5103.

The 2004 amendments are made to petition for review practice to address
the evolution of judicial responses to governmental actions. As indicated in the
Note to Rule 1502, when the Rules of Appellate Procedure were initially adopted,
there was a ‘‘long history in the Commonwealth . . . of relatively complete
exercise of the judicial review function under the traditional labels of equity,
mandamus, certiorari and prohibition.’’ While such original jurisdiction forms of
action are still available, their proper usage is now the exception rather than the
rule because appellate proceedings have become the norm. Thus, the need to
rely on Rule 1503 to convert an appellate proceeding to an original jurisdiction
action and vice versa arises less often. Moreover, the emphasis on a petition for
review as a generic pleading that permits the court to simultaneously consider all
aspects of the controversy is diminished. The primary concern became making
the practice for appellate proceedings more apparent to the occasional appellate
practitioner. Accordingly, the rules have been amended to more clearly separate
procedures for appellate proceedings from those applicable to original
jurisdiction proceedings.

35
 The responsibility of identifying the correct type of proceeding to be used
to challenge a governmental action is initially that of counsel. Where precedent
makes the choice clear, counsel can proceed with confidence. Where the choice
is more problematic, then counsel should draft the petition for review so as to
satisfy the directives for both appellate and original jurisdiction proceedings.
Then the court can designate the proper course of action regardless of counsel’s
earlier assessment.]

This chapter applies to appeals of administrative agency action, original
jurisdiction actions cognizable in an appellate court in the nature of actions in
equity, replevin, mandamus or quo warranto or for declaratory judgment, or upon
writs of certiorari or prohibition, and appeals of other actions as enumerated in
paragraph (a). The document that initiates the case under Chapter 15 is called a
petition for review. Judicial review of all other government unit actions or
inactions not otherwise permitted under Chapters 9, 11, 13, or 15 is available
under Chapter 16; the document that initiates the case under Chapter 16 is called
a petition for specialized review. The “residuary” initiating document function
previously assigned to Chapter 15 is now assigned to Chapter 16.

36
Rule 1502. Exclusive Procedure.

The appeal and the original jurisdiction actions of equity, replevin, mandamus,
and [quo warranto] quo warranto, the action for a declaratory judgment, and the writs
of [certiorari] certiorari and prohibition [are abolished insofar as they relate to
matters within the scope of a petition for review under this chapter] are replaced
by the petition for review. [The petition for review, insofar as applicable under
this chapter, shall be the exclusive procedure for judicial review of a
determination of a government unit.]

[Official Note: This chapter recognizes that the modern label ‘‘appeal’’ has
little significance in connection with judicial review of governmental
determinations in light of the long history in this Commonwealth of relatively
complete exercise of the judicial review function under the traditional labels of
equity, mandamus, certiorari and prohibition. If the simple form of notice of
appeal utilized in Chapter 9 (appeals from lower courts) were extended to
governmental determinations without any requirement for the filing of motions for
post-trial relief, a litigant who incorrectly selected the appeal label, rather than the
equity, mandamus, replevin, or prohibition, etc. label, would probably suffer
dismissal, because the court would be reluctant to try a proceeding in the nature
of equity, mandamus, replevin, or prohibition, etc. in the absence of a proper
pleading adequately framing the issues.

The solution introduced by these rules is to substitute a new pleading (the
petition for review) for all of the prior types of pleading which seek relief from a
governmental determination (including governmental inaction). Where the
reviewing court is required or permitted to hear the matter de novo, the judicial
review proceeding will go forward in a manner similar to an equity or mandamus
action. Where the reviewing court is required to decide the questions presented
solely on the record made below, the judicial review proceeding will go forward in
a manner similar to appellate review of an order of a lower court. However,
experience teaches that governmental determinations are so varied in character,
and generate so many novel situations, that on occasion it is only at the
conclusion of the judicial review process, when a remedy is being fashioned, that
one can determine whether the proceeding was in the nature of equity,
mandamus, prohibition, or statutory appeal, etc. The petition for review will
eliminate the wasteful and confusing practice of filing multiple ‘‘shotgun’’
pleadings in equity, mandamus, prohibition, statutory appeal, etc., and related
motions for consolidation, and will permit the parties and the court to proceed
directly to the merits unencumbered by procedural abstractions.

37
 Rule 1551 (scope of review) makes clear that the change in manner of
pleading does not change the scope or standard of review of governmental
determinations or otherwise affect the substantive rights of the parties.]

It should be noted that a petition for review in the nature of mandamus or
prohibition will lie against a [lower] trial court (which is a ‘‘government unit’’), since
such relief is not available under the rules cited in [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1501(b).

[See] See 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(e) [(single form of action)], which provides as
follows:

(e) [Single form of action] Single form of action.—Where pursuant to general
rules review of a determination of a government unit may be had by a petition for a
review or another single form of action embracing the appeal and actions in the nature
of equity, mandamus, prohibition, [quo warranto] quo warranto, or otherwise, the
jurisdiction of the appellate court shall not be limited by the provisions of 1 Pa.C.S.
§ 1504 (relating to statutory remedy preferred over common law), but such provisions to
the extent applicable shall limit the relief available.

38
Rule 1503. Improvident Appeals or Original Jurisdiction Actions.

If a filing should be labeled a petition for review, but is not, [an appeal is
taken from an order of a government unit, or if a complaint in the nature of equity,
replevin, mandamus, or quo warranto, or a petition for a declaratory judgment or
for a writ in the nature of certiorari or prohibition is filed against a government
unit or one or more of the persons for the time being conducting its affairs
objecting to a determination by any one or more of them,] this alone shall not be a
ground for dismissal. The filing [papers whereon the improvident matter was
commenced] shall be regarded and acted upon as a petition for review [of such
governmental determination] and as if filed at the time the improvident filing was
made [matter was commenced]. The court may require that the filing [papers] be
clarified by amendment or be supplemented.

Official Note: Based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 708 (improvident administrative appeals and other
matters).

39
Rule 1504. Improvident Petitions for Review.

If a filing in a court is labeled as a petition for review but [a petition for
review is filed against any person, where] the proper mode of relief is an original
jurisdiction action in equity, replevin, mandamus or [quo warranto] quo warranto, or a
petition for a declaratory judgment or for a writ of certiorari or prohibition, this alone shall
not be a ground for dismissal.[, but t] The filing [papers whereon the improvident
matter was commenced] shall be regarded and acted upon as a complaint or other
proper process [commenced against such person] and as if filed at the time the
improvident filing was made [matter was commenced]. The court may require that
the filing [papers] be clarified by amendment.

Official Note: Based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 102 (definitions) (which includes petition for review
proceedings within the statutory definition of ‘‘appeal’’) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(b)
(appeals). When the moving party files a clarifying amendment, the amendment will
operate to specify that one form of action which the party elects to proceed on.

40
 PETITION FOR REVIEW

Rule 1511. Manner of Obtaining Judicial Review of Governmental Determinations.

Review under this chapter shall be obtained by filing a petition for review with the
prothonotary of the appellate court within the time allowed by Pa.R.A.P. 1512 [Rule
1512 (time for petitioning for review)]. Failure of a petitioner for review to take any
step other than the timely filing of a petition for review does not affect the validity of the
review proceeding, but is grounds only for such action as the appellate court deems
appropriate, which may include dismissal of the review proceeding.

41
Rule 1512. Time for Petitioning for Review.

(a) Appeals authorized by law.—Except as otherwise prescribed by
paragraph [subdivision] (b) of this rule:

(1) A petition for review of a quasijudicial order, or an order appealable
under 42 Pa.C.S. § 763(b) (awards of arbitrators) or under any other provision of
law, shall be filed with the prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after
the entry of the order.

(2) If a timely petition for review of such an order is filed by a party, any
other party may file a cross-petition for review within 14 days of the date on
which the first petition for review was served, or within the time otherwise
prescribed by subparagraph [subdivision] (a)(1) of this rule, whichever period
last expires.

(b) Special appellate provisions.—A petition for review of:

(1) A determination of the Department of Community and Economic
Development in any matter arising under [the Local Government Unit Debt
Act,] 53 Pa.C.S. §§ 8001—[8271,] 8285 shall be filed within 15 days after entry
of the order or the date the determination is deemed to have been made, when
no order has been entered.

(2) A determination governed by Pa.R.A.P. 1571 [Rule 1571]
(determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue) shall be filed within the
appropriate period therein specified.

(3) [A determination governed by Rule 3331 (review of special
prosecutions or investigations) shall be filed within ten days after the entry
of the order sought to be reviewed.]

[(4)] A determination of a Commonwealth agency under [section
1711.1(g) of the Commonwealth Procurement Code,] 62 Pa.C.S.
§ 1711.1(g)[,] shall be filed within 15 days of the mailing date of a final
determination denying a protest.

[(5) A determination governed by Rule 1770 (review of
dispositional order for out of home placement in juvenile delinquency
matters) shall be filed within ten days of the order sought to be reviewed.]

(c) Original jurisdiction actions.—A petition for review of a determination of a
government unit within the scope of Chapter 15 but not within the scope of

42
paragraphs [Subdivisions] (a) or (b) of this rule may be filed with the prothonotary of
the appellate court within the time, if any, limited by law.

Official Note: The note to Pa.R.A.P. 903 [Rule 903] (time for appeal) addresses the
development of the standard 30-day [30 day] appeal period. Pa.R.A.P. [Rule] 102
defines a ‘‘quasijudicial order’’ as ‘‘an order of a government unit, made after notice and
opportunity for hearing, which is by law reviewable solely upon the record made before
the government unit, and not upon a record made in whole or in part before the
reviewing court.’’

Paragraph [Subdivision] (c) relates to matters addressed to the original
jurisdiction of an appellate court. For example, equitable matters are governed by
existing principles of laches, etc. Other matters, such as petitions for review raising
issues formerly cognizable by action in mandamus or [quo warranto] quo warranto,
etc., are governed by the time limits, if any, applicable under the prior procedure. [See
generally] See generally 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 1702 (regarding the Supreme Court’s
rulemaking procedures), 1722(c) (Time limitations), 5501—5574 (Limitations of time).

43
Rule 1513. Petition for Review.

(a) Caption and parties on appeal.--In an appellate jurisdiction petition for
review, the aggrieved party or person shall be named as the petitioner. [and, u]Unless
the government unit is disinterested, the government unit and no one else shall be
named as the respondent. If the government unit is disinterested, all real parties in
interest[, and not the government unit,] shall be named as respondents and the
disinterested government unit shall be identified in parentheses after the
respondents in the caption.

(b) Caption and parties in original jurisdiction actions.--The government unit
and any other indispensable party shall be named as respondents. Where a public act
or duty is required to be performed by a government unit, it is sufficient to name the
government unit, and not its individual members, as respondent.

(c) Form.--Any petition for review shall be divided into consecutively
numbered paragraphs. Each paragraph shall contain, as nearly as possible, a single
allegation of fact or other statement. [When petitioner seeks review of an order
refusing to certify an interlocutory order for immediate appeal, numbered
paragraphs need not be used.]

(d) Content of appellate jurisdiction petition for review.--An appellate
jurisdiction petition for review shall contain the following:

(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the court;

(2) the name of the party or person seeking review;

(3) the name of the government unit that made the order or other
determination sought to be reviewed;

(4) reference to the order or other determination sought to be
reviewed, including the date the order or other determination was entered;

(5) a general statement of the objections to the order or other
determination, but the omission of an issue from the statement shall not be the
basis for a finding of waiver if the court is able to address the issue based on the
certified record;

(6) a short statement of the relief sought;

(7) a copy of the order or other determination to be reviewed, which
shall be attached to the petition for review as an exhibit; and

44
 (8) the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

No notice to plead or verification is necessary.

Where there were other parties to the proceedings conducted by the
government unit, and such parties are not named in the caption of the petition for
review, the petition for review shall also contain a notice to participate, which shall
provide substantially as follows:

If you intend to participate in this proceeding in the (Supreme, Superior, or
Commonwealth, as appropriate) Court, you must serve and file a notice of
intervention under Pa.R.A.P. 1531 [of the Pennsylvania Rules of
Appellate Procedure] within 30 days.

(e) Content of original jurisdiction petition for review.--A petition for review
addressed to an appellate court’s original jurisdiction shall contain the following:

(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the court;

(2) the name of the person or party seeking relief;

(3) the name of the government unit whose action or inaction is in
issue and any other indispensable party;

(4) a general statement of the material facts upon which the cause of
action is based;

(5) a short statement of the relief sought;

(6) a notice to plead and verification either by oath or affirmation or by
verified statement; and

(7) the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(f) Alternative objections.--Objections to a determination of a government unit
and the related relief sought may be stated in the alternative, and relief of several
different types may be requested.

Official Note: [The 2004 amendments to this rule clarify what must be included in a
petition for review addressed to an appellate court’s appellate jurisdiction and
what must be included in a petition for review addressed to an appellate court’s
original jurisdiction. Where it is not readily apparent whether a ‘‘determination’’
(defined in Pa.R.A.P. 102 as ‘‘[a]ction or inaction by a government unit) is

45
reviewable in the court’s appellate or original jurisdiction, compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) is appropriate.]

Paragraphs (a) and (b) reflect the provisions of Pa.R.A.P. 501, Pa.R.A.P. 503,
[Section 702 of the Administrative Agency Law,] 2 Pa.C.S. § 702 (Appeals), and
Pa.R.C.P. 1094 (regarding parties defendant in mandamus actions).

Government units that are usually disinterested in appellate jurisdiction petitions
for review of their determinations include:

• the Board of Claims,
• the Department of Education (with regard to teacher tenure appeals from
local school districts pursuant to [section 1132 of the Public School Code of
1949,] 24 P.S. § 11-1132),
• the Environmental Hearing Board,
• the Office of Open Records,
• the State Charter School Appeal Board,
• the State Civil Service Commission, and
• the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board.

Pa.R.A.P. 1513(a) was amended in 2020 to require that the caption of a
petition for review from a determination of a disinterested government unit
identify the government unit. Thus, the caption of a petition for review from a
determination of a government unit listed above should be in the following form:

John Doe,
Petitioner
v.
Jane Smith (name of disinterested government unit),
Respondent

The provision for joinder of indispensable parties in original jurisdiction actions
reflects the last sentence of [section 761(c) of the Judicial Code,] 42 Pa.C.S.
§ 761(c), providing for the implementation of ancillary jurisdiction of the Commonwealth
Court by general rule.

Paragraphs (d) and (e) reflect the differences in proceeding in a court’s original
and appellate jurisdiction, while preserving the need for sufficient specificity to permit
the conversion of an appellate document to an original jurisdiction pleading and vice
versa should such action be necessary to assure proper judicial disposition. Where it
is not readily apparent whether a ‘‘determination’’ under Pa.R.A.P. 1501 is
reviewable in the court’s appellate or original jurisdiction, compliance with the

46
requirements of both paragraphs (d) and (e) is appropriate. [See also the notes to
Pa.R.A.P. 1501 and 1502.]

[Official Note -- 2014]

The 2014 amendments to Pa.R.A.P. 1513(d) relating to the general statement of
objections in an appellate jurisdiction petition for review are intended to preclude a
finding of waiver if the court is able, based on the certified record, to address an issue
not within the issues stated in the petition for review but included in the statement of
questions involved and argued in a brief. The amendment neither expands the scope of
issues that may be addressed in an appellate jurisdiction petition for review beyond
those permitted in Pa.R.A.P. 1551(a) nor affects Pa.R.A.P. 2116’s requirement that
‘‘[n]o question will be considered unless it is stated in the statement of questions
involved [in appellant’s brief] or is fairly suggested thereby.’’

47
Rule 1514. Filing and Service of the Petition for Review.

(a) Filing with the prothonotary.--The petition for review, with proof of the
service that is required by paragraph [Subdivision] (c) of this rule, shall be filed with
the prothonotary of the appellate court in person or by first class, express, or priority
United States Postal Service mail.

If the petition for review is filed by first class, express, or priority United States
Postal Service mail, the petition shall be deemed received by the prothonotary for the
purposes of Pa.R.A.P. 121(a) [Rule 121(a) (filing)] on the date deposited in the United
States mail, as shown on a United States Postal Service Form 3817, Certificate of
Mailing, or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of
deposit can be verified. The certificate of mailing or other similar Postal Service form
from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the Postal Service
and shall show the docket number of the matter in the government unit, and shall be
either enclosed with the petition or separately mailed to the prothonotary.

Upon actual receipt of the petition for review, the prothonotary shall immediately:

(1) stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date, or the date of
earlier deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this paragraph
[subdivision], shall constitute the date of filing;

(2) assign a docket number to the petition for review; and

(3) give written notice of the docket number assignment in person or by
first class mail to the government unit that made the determination sought to be
reviewed, to the petitioner, and to the other persons named in the proof of
service accompanying the petition.

(b) Fee.--The petitioner, upon filing the petition for review, shall pay any fees
therefor as set by law or general rule.

(c) Service.--A copy of the petition for review shall be served by the petitioner
in person or by certified mail on both the government unit that made the determination
sought to be reviewed and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. [In matters
involving the Commonwealth, the petitioner shall similarly serve a copy upon the
Attorney General of Pennsylvania.] Where there is more than one respondent, the
petitioner shall separately serve each one. All other parties before the government unit
that made the determination sought to be reviewed shall be served as prescribed by
Pa.R.A.P. 121(b) [Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required)].

48
 (d) Entry of appearance.--Upon the filing of the petition for review, the
prothonotary shall note on the docket as counsel for the petitioner the name of counsel,
if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for review, and, as counsel for other
parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary shall, upon
[praecipe]praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed within 30 days after filing
of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearances. Thereafter a counsel’s
appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another
lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.

Official Note: [See] See the Official Note to Pa.R.A.P. 1112 [Rule 1112] (appeals by
allowance) for an explanation of the procedure when Form 3817 or other similar United
States Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified is used.

The petition for review must be served on the government unit that made the
determination in question. [Rule 102 defines ‘‘government unit’’ as including ‘‘any
court or other officer or agency of the unified judicial system.’’ Thus, a petition
for review of a trial court order must be served on the judge who issued the
order.]

Service on the Attorney General shall be made at: Strawberry Square,
Harrisburg, PA 17120.

With respect to appearances by new counsel following the initial docketing of
appearances pursuant to paragraph [Subdivision] (d) of this rule, please note the
requirements of Pa.R.A.P. [Rule] 120.

49
Rule 1515. Rescinded.

Official Note: Pa.R.A.P. [Rule] 1515 formerly provided for an answer to a petition for
review addressed to an appellate court’s original jurisdiction. Answers to such petitions
are now discussed in Pa.R.A.P. [Rule] 1516.

50
Rule 1516. Other Pleadings Allowed.

(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.—No answer or other pleading to
an appellate jurisdiction petition for review is authorized, unless the petition for review is
filed pursuant to [the notes to Pa.R.A.P. 341 or 1311 (seeking review of a trial court
or other government unit’s refusal to certify an interlocutory order for immediate
appeal), Pa.R.A.P. 1573 (review of orders finding an assertion of double jeopardy
frivolous), Pa.R.A.P. 1762 (regarding release in criminal matters), Pa.R.A.P. 1770
(regarding placement in juvenile delinquency matters), Pa.R.A.P. 3321 (regarding
appeals from decisions of the Legislative Reapportionment Commission) or
Pa.R.A.P. 3331 (regarding review of special prosecutions and investigations)]
Pa.R.A.P. 3321 (appeals from Legislative Reapportionment Commission). Where
an answer is authorized, the time for filing an answer shall be as stated in Pa.R.A.P.
123(b), and the answer shall contain the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P.
127.

(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—Where an action is commenced
by filing a petition for review addressed to the appellate court’s original jurisdiction, the
pleadings are limited to the petition for review, an answer thereto, a reply if the answer
contains new matter or a counterclaim, a counter-reply if the reply to a counterclaim
contains new matter, [a] preliminary objections, and [an] answers thereto. A pleading
shall contain the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127. Every pleading
filed after an original jurisdiction petition for review shall be filed within 30 days after
service of the preceding pleading, but no pleading need be filed unless the preceding
pleading is endorsed with a notice to plead.

Official Note: [The 2004, 2012, and 2013 amendments made clear that, with limited
exceptions, no answer or other pleading to a petition for review addressed to an
appellate court’s appellate jurisdiction is proper.] With regard to original jurisdiction
proceedings, practice is patterned after Pa.R.C.P. 1017(a) (Pleadings Allowed) and
1026 (Time for Filing. Notice to Plead) [Rules of Civil Procedure 1017(a)
(Pleadings Allowed) and 1026 (Time for Filing. Notice to Plead)]. The ten additional
days in which to file a subsequent pleading are in recognition of the time required for
agency coordination where the Commonwealth is a party. [See Pa.R.A.P. 1762(b)(2)
regarding bail applications. See Pa.R.A.P. 1770 regarding placement in juvenile
delinquency matters.]

51
Rule 1517. Applicable Rules of Pleading.

Unless otherwise prescribed by these rules, the practice and procedure under
this chapter relating to pleadings in original jurisdiction petition for review practice shall
be in accordance with the appropriate Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, so far as
they may be applied.

[Official Note: See Rule 1762(b)(2) regarding bail applications. See Rule 1770
regarding placement in juvenile delinquency matters. See also Rule 3331
regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]

52
Rule 1531. Intervention.

(a) Appellate jurisdiction petition for review proceedings. A party to a
proceeding before a government unit that resulted in a quasijudicial order may intervene
as of right in a proceeding under this chapter relating to such order by filing a notice of
intervention (with proof of service on all parties to the matter) with the prothonotary of
the appellate court within 30 days after notice of the filing of the petition for review. The
notice of intervention may be in substantially the following form:

NOTICE OF INTERVENTION

Notice is hereby given that A.B., a party below, hereby intervenes in this matter.

(s)__________________________

____________________________
(Address and telephone number)

After 30 days after notice of filing of an appellate petition for review, permission to
intervene may be sought by application pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. [Rule] 123.

(b) Original jurisdiction petition for review proceedings. A person not named as a
respondent in an original jurisdiction petition for review[,] who desires to intervene in a
proceeding under this chapter, may seek leave to intervene by filing an application for
leave to intervene (with proof of service on all parties to the matter) with the
prothonotary of the court. The application shall contain a concise statement of the
interest of the applicant and the grounds upon which intervention is sought.

Official Note: A nonparty may file a brief as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 531 [Rule 531]
(participation by [amicus curiae] amicus curiae) and, therefore, intervention is not
necessary in order to participate in the appellate court where the petition for review is
filed. However, except as provided in [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 521(b) (status of Attorney
General) and [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 522(b) (status of Court Administrator), the mere filing of
a brief does not confer party status. Where, for example, a nonparty to a petition for
review proceeding in the Commonwealth Court desires to be in a position to seek
further review in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania or the Supreme Court of the
United States of an order of the Commonwealth Court disposing of the petition for
review, the nonparty should intervene or seek leave to intervene in the Commonwealth
Court at the outset, [since] because under Pa.R.A.P. 501 [Rule 501 (any aggrieved
party may appeal)], party status is a prerequisite to the right to further review.

53
 [See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or
Investigations.]

54
Rule 1532. Special and Summary Relief.

(a) Special relief.--At any time after the filing of a petition for review, the court
may, on application, order the seizure of property, dispose of seized property, issue a
preliminary or special injunction, appoint a temporary receiver, or grant other interim or
special relief required in the interest of justice and consistent with the usages and
principles of law.

(b) Summary relief.--At any time after the filing of a petition for review in an
appellate or original jurisdiction matter, the court may on application enter judgment if
the right of the applicant thereto is clear.

Official Note: Paragraph [Subdivision] (a) provides examples of specific types of
interim relief that may be sought using the procedures set forth in Pa.R.A.P. 123 [Rule
123 (application for relief)]. Thus, multiple forms of relief, including those in the
alternative, may be combined in the same application, even though separate actions
might otherwise be necessary under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.
[Compare Rule 106 (original jurisdiction matters);] Compare Pa.R.A.P. 106
(original jurisdiction matters) with 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(e) (single form of action).

Paragraph [Subdivision] (b) authorizes immediate disposition of a petition for
review, similar to the type of relief envisioned by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil
Procedure regarding judgment on the pleadings and peremptory and summary
judgment. However, such relief may be requested before the pleadings are closed
where the right of the applicant is clear.

[See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.

The 1997 amendment to subdivision (b) is analogous to the 1996
amendment to Pa.R.C.P. 1098. The deletion of the last sentence of Rule 1532(b) is
intended to eliminate the requirement of filing a motion to open or vacate the
order granting summary relief. Under prior practice, a party was required to file a
motion to open or vacate the order granting summary relief before an appeal
could be taken. An order denying an application for summary relief is not
appealable as of right.]

55
Rule 1541. Certification of the Record.

Upon notice from the appellate court of the filing of a petition for review
addressed to the appellate jurisdiction of an appellate court, the government unit shall
prepare and transmit the record as provided by Chapter 19 [(preparation and
transmission of record and related matters)].

[Official Note: Rule 102 defines ‘‘government unit’’ to include ‘‘any court or other
officer or agency of the unified judicial system.’’ Thus, if the order to be reviewed
was filed by a trial court, that court shall certify the record. This occurs when the
petition for review was filed pursuant to Rule 1762, 1770, 3321 or 3331, or the note
to Rules 341 or 1311.

See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]

56
Rule 1542. Evidentiary Hearing.

In any matter addressed to the appellate court’s original jurisdiction[,] where it
appears that a genuine issue as to a material fact has been raised by the pleadings,
depositions, answers to interrogatories, stipulations of fact, admissions on file, and
supporting verified statements, if any, the court on its own motion or on application of
any party shall, after notice to the parties, hold an evidentiary hearing for the
development of the record.

Official Note: In view of [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 106 (original jurisdiction matters) and [Rule]
Pa.R.A.P. 1532 (special and summary relief), motions for judgment on the pleadings,
Pa.R.C.P. 1034, summary relief and summary judgment, Pa.R.C.P. 1035.1-1035.5
[1035], will be available where a petition for review invoking the appellate court’s
original jurisdiction has been filed. The procedure under this rule is intended to be
flexible, although it remains subject to the control of the appellate court [by] either by
rule of court adopted pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 104(a)(3) [Rule 104(a)(3) (rules of court)]
or by order.

[See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or
Investigations.]

Rule 1543. Rescinded.

[Official Note: See 42 Pa.C.S. § 5104 (trial by jury).

See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]

57
Rule 1551. Scope of Review.

(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.--Review of quasijudicial orders
shall be conducted by the court on the record made before the government unit. [No]
Only questions raised before the government unit shall be heard or considered, [by
the court which was not raised before the government unit] except:

(1) Questions involving the validity of a statute.

(2) Questions involving the jurisdiction of the government unit over the
subject matter of the adjudication.

(3) Questions [which] that the court is satisfied [that] the petitioner
could not by the exercise of due diligence have raised before the government
unit. If, upon hearing before the court, the court is satisfied that any such
additional question within the scope of this paragraph should be [so] raised, it
shall remand the record to the government unit for further consideration of the
additional question.

The court may in any case remand the record to the government unit for further
proceedings if the court deems them necessary.

(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.--The court shall hear and decide
original jurisdiction petitions for review in accordance with law. This chapter is not
intended to modify, enlarge, or abridge the rights of any party to an original jurisdiction
petition for review.

[Official Note: Subdivision (a) is a generalization of former Pa.R.C.P. 8 and
makes no change in substance except to provide that procedural issues not
raised below are waived—unless excused under Paragraph (a)(3). Compare Rule
302 (requisites for reviewable issue).

Subdivision (b) is based on Section 10(c) of Article V of the Constitution of
Pennsylvania, which prevents this chapter from enlarging the substantive rights
of the petitioner or abridging the substantive rights of the government unit named
in the petition. Under the new practice, the appellate judge should inquire:
‘‘Assuming that this case had been properly brought before me by a complaint in
equity (or in mandamus, replevin, quo warranto, etc., or by two or more of such
actions properly consolidated for hearing and disposition) containing the factual
allegations of the petition for review, to what relief, if any, would the moving party
have been entitled under the prior practice?’’ This rule makes clear that the
moving party is entitled to the same relief, and no more, under the new practice,

58
since only the procedural requirement for separately labeled papers has been
eliminated.

For example, where a party joins both a challenge to the action of a
government unit in the nature of an appeal and a challenge to the composition of
the government unit in the nature of quo warranto, the latter challenge will come
too late under the standards of State Dental Council and Examining Board v.
Pollock, 457 Pa. 264, 318 A.2d 910 (1974). Similarly, where a petition for review in
the nature of prohibition is filed in the Supreme Court to attack an unappealable
order of a lower court, in a case where relief would not have been available on an
application for a writ of prohibition under the standards of Carpentertown Coal
and Coke Co. v. Laird, 360 Pa. 94, 61 A.2d 426 (1948) and subsequent cases, the
change in the label of the papers to a petition for review will not affect the result,
and the petition will be dismissed.

See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]

59
Rule 1561. Disposition of Petition for Review.

(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.—The court may affirm, modify,
vacate, set aside, or reverse any order brought before it for review, and it may remand
the matter and direct the entry of such appropriate order, or require such further
proceedings as may be just under the circumstances.

(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—Where the petition for review
raises questions that formerly were determinable in an action in equity, replevin,
mandamus, or [quo warranto] quo warranto, or for a declaratory judgment or upon a
petition for a writ of [certiorari] certiorari or prohibition, or in another similar plenary
action or proceeding, the court may grant the relief heretofore available in any such
plenary action or proceeding.

(c) Money damages.—Money damages arising out of tort or contract claims
may not be granted under this chapter (except on review of determinations of the Board
of Claims or similar agencies), but relief granted under paragraph [Subdivision] (b) of
this rule may include any damages to which the petitioner is entitled which are claimed
in the petition, which are ancillary to the matter, and which may be granted by a court.

[(d) Review of detention.—Except as prescribed by Rule 1762(b)(2),
which governs applications relating to bail when no appeal is pending, or by Rule
3331 (review of special prosecutions or investigations), review in the nature of
criminal habeas corpus or post conviction relief may not be granted under this
chapter.]

Official Note: Paragraph [Subdivision] (a) is based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 706 (disposition of
appeals).

Paragraph [Subdivision] (b) is based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(e) (single form of
action), [(]which provides that 1 Pa.C.S. § 1504 (statutory remedy preferred over
common law) does not limit the jurisdiction of a court over a petition for review
proceeding, but to the extent applicable [shall] limits the relief available[)], and 42
Pa.C.S. § 5105(d)(2) (scope of appeal). Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 102 [(definitions)],
statutory references to ‘‘appeal’’ include proceedings on petition for review. The
paragraph [subdivision] is intended to make clear that the petition for review is a
generic pleading [which] that will permit the court to consider simultaneously all aspects
of the controversy.

Paragraph [Subdivision] (c) is intended to make clear that the petition for
review does not encompass trespass or assumpsit actions, but that an appeal may
reach tort or contract matters adjudicated by a government unit as contemplated by
Section 2(h) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, [(]42 P.S. § 20002(h)[)]. As to ancillary

60
statutory damages, [see] see 42 Pa.C.S. § 8303 (action for performance of a duty
required by law).

[Subdivision (d) is intended to make clear that the scope of this chapter is
essentially civil in nature. The application of the petition for review to questions
of release prior to sentence in criminal matters and in questions arising out of
special prosecutions or investigations is merely a recognition of the technical
need for a plenary filing to bring the question within the appellate jurisdiction of
the appropriate court.

See Rule 1762(b)(2) regarding bail applications.]

61
 REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS OF THE BOARD OF FINANCE
AND REVENUE

Rule 1571. Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue.

(a) General rule.—Review of a determination of the Board of Finance and
Revenue shall be governed by this chapter and ancillary provisions of these rules,
except as otherwise prescribed by this rule.

(b) Time for petitioning for review.—A petition for review of a determination of
the Board of Finance and Revenue shall be filed:

(1) Within 30 days after entry of an order of the Board which does not
expressly state that it is interlocutory in nature.

(2) Within 30 days after entry of an order of the Board adopting a
determination by the Department of Revenue or other government unit made at
the direction of the Board respecting any matter pending before the Board.

(3) Where the Board is required by statute to act finally on any matter
pending before it within a specified period after the matter is filed with the Board
and has not done so, at any time between:

(i) the expiration of such specified period; and

(ii) 30 days after service of actual notice by the Board stating
that it has failed to act within such period.

(c) Form.—The petition for review shall contain:

(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the court;

(2) the name of the party seeking review;

(3) a statement that the Board of Finance and Revenue made the
determination sought to be reviewed;

(4) reference to the order or other determination sought to be
reviewed; and a general statement of the objections to the order or other
determination.

The petition for review need not be verified and shall not contain or have endorsed upon
it notice to plead. A petition for review of a taxpayer or similar party shall name the

62
‘‘Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’’ as respondent and a petition for review filed by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall name all real parties in interest before the Board
as respondents. The petition for review shall contain the certificate of compliance
required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(d) Service.—In the case of a petition for review filed by a taxpayer or similar
party, the petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition [shall be served] on the Board
of Finance and Revenue and on the Attorney General [by the petitioner] in accordance
with Pa.R.A.P. 1514(c). All other parties before the Board shall be served as prescribed
by Pa.R.A.P. 121(b) (service of all papers required).

(e) Answer.—An answer may not be filed to a petition for review of a
determination of the Board of Finance and Revenue. The Commonwealth may raise
any question on review, [although] even if no [cross petition] cross-petition for
review has been filed by it, and may introduce any facts in support of its position [if] so
long as it provides the petitioner with [20 days] written notice 20 days [is given to
the petitioner] prior to trial of [the] its intention of raising [such] new questions or
presenting new facts.

(f) Record.—No record shall be certified to the court by the Board of Finance
and Revenue. After the filing of the petition for review, the parties shall take appropriate
steps to prepare and file a stipulation of such facts as may be agreed to and to identify
the issues of fact, if any, which remain to be tried. See Pa.R.A.P. 1542 [See Rule
1542] (evidentiary hearing).

(g) Oral argument.—Except as otherwise ordered by the court on its own
motion or on application of any party, after the record is closed, the matter may be listed
for argument before or submission to the court.

(h) Scope of review.—Pa.R.A.P. 1551(a) (appellate jurisdiction petitions for
review) shall be applicable to review of a determination of the Board of Finance and
Revenue except that:

(1) A question will be heard and considered by the court if it was raised
at any stage of the proceedings below and thereafter preserved.

(2) To the extent provided by the applicable law, the questions raised
by the petition for review shall be determined on the record made before the
court. See paragraph (f) of this rule.

(i) Exceptions.—Any party may file exceptions to an initial determination by
the court under this rule within 30 days after the entry of the order to which exception is
taken. Such timely exceptions shall have the effect, for the purposes of Pa.R.A.P.

63
1701(b)(3) (authority of a trial court or [agency] other government unit after appeal),
of an order expressly granting reconsideration of the determination previously entered
by the court. Issues not raised on exceptions are waived and cannot be raised on
appeal.

Official Note: Paragraph (b) represents an exercise of the power conferred by 42
Pa.C.S. § 5105(a) (right to appellate review) to define final orders by general rule. The
following statutes expressly require the Board of Finance and Revenue to act within six
months in certain cases:

Section 1103 of The Fiscal Code, Act of April 9, 1929 (P.L. 343), 72 P.S. § 1103.

Section 2005 (malt beverage tax) of The Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March
4, 1971 (P.L. 6), 72 P.S. § 9005.

The following statute requires the Board of Finance and Revenue to act within
twelve months in certain tax refund matters:

Section 3003.5 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4, 1971 (P.L. 6),
72 P.S. § 10003.5.

The following statutes are covered by Section 1103 of The Fiscal Code:

Sections 809 (various insurance taxes) and 1001 (miscellaneous settlements, for
example, under Section 212 of The Insurance Department Act of 1921, Act of May 17,
1921 (P.L. 789), 40 P.S. § 50) of the Fiscal Code, Act of April 9, 1929 (P.L. 343), 72
P.S. §§ 809 and 1001.

Section 6 of the Co-operative Agricultural Association Corporate Net Income Tax
Act, Act of May 23, 1945 (P.L. 893), 72 P.S. §§ 3420-21[,] et seq.

Sections 407 (corporate net income tax), 603 (capital stock—franchise tax), 702
(bank and trust company shares tax), 802 (title insurance companies shares tax), 904
(insurance premiums tax), 1102 (gross receipts tax), 1111-C (realty transfer tax), and
1503 (mutual thrift institutions tax) of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4,
1971 (P.L. 6), 72 P.S. §§ 7407, 7603, 7702, 7802, 7904, 8102, 8111-C, and 8503.

75 Pa.C.S. § 9616(f) (motor carriers road tax).

The basis of jurisdiction of the court under this rule will ordinarily be 42 Pa.C.S.
§ 763 (direct appeals from government agencies). Paragraph (c) is not intended to
change the practice in connection with the review of orders of the Board of Finance and
Revenue insofar as the amount of detail in the pleadings is concerned. What is

64
required is that the petitioner raise in the petition for review every legal issue [in the
petition for review which] that the petitioner wishes the court to consider. The legal
issues raised need only be specific enough to apprise the respondent of the legal issues
being contested ([e.g.] for example, ‘‘valuation,’’ ‘‘manufacturing,’’ ‘‘sale for resale,’’
etc.). See generally House of Pasta, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 390 A.2d 341 (Pa. Cmwlth.
1978).

Paragraph (e) is based on Section 1104(e) of The Fiscal Code, which was
suspended absolutely by these rules, and subsequently repealed.

Paragraph (f) is based on 2 Pa.C.S. § 501(b)(1) [(scope of subchapter)] and 2
Pa.C.S. § 701(b)(1) [(scope of subchapter)], which exclude tax matters from the on-
the-record review requirements of 2 Pa.C.S. § 704 [(disposition of appeal)].

Paragraph (h) is based on Section 1104(d) of The Fiscal Code, which was
suspended absolutely by these rules and subsequently repealed, and is intended as a
continuation of the prior law, except, of course, that the separate specification of
objections has been abolished by these rules.

Paragraph (i) is intended to make clear that the failure to file exceptions will result
in waiver by a petitioner of any issues previously presented to the Commonwealth
Court.

See also Pa.R.A.P. 1782 (security on review in tax matters).

65
 [REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS BY A COURT OF COMMON PLEAS THAT A
CLAIM OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY IS FRIVOLOUS]

Rule 1573. [Review of Orders in Which the Court Finds an Assertion of Double
Jeopardy Frivolous] Reserved.

[(a) General rule.—Any party seeking review of a frivolousness
determination by a court of common pleas under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal
Procedure 587 shall file a petition for review in the appellate court having
jurisdiction over the matter. Review of a frivolousness determination under
Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 587 shall be governed by this chapter
and ancillary provisions of these rules, except as otherwise prescribed by this
rule. The time for filing is provided for in Pa.R.A.P. 1512(a)(1).

(b) Contents.—The contents of the petition for review are not governed
by Pa.R.A.P. 1513. Instead, the petition for review need not be set forth in
numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the
following (which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):

(1) A statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate
court.

(2) The text of the order in question, and the date of its entry in
the trial court. If the order is voluminous, it may, if more convenient, be
appended to the petition.

(3) A concise statement of the case containing the facts
necessary to an understanding of the frivolousness issue(s) presented.

(4) The question(s) presented, expressed in the terms and
circumstances of the case but without unnecessary detail.

(5) A concise statement of the reasons why the trial court erred in
its determination of frivolousness.

(6) There shall be appended to the petition a copy of any opinions
relating to the order sought to be reviewed, including findings of fact and
conclusions of law in support of the frivolousness determination, as well
as a copy of any transcripts or other record documents necessary to the
appellate court’s review.

66
 (7) There shall be appended to the petition the verbatim texts of
the pertinent provisions of constitutional provisions, statutes, ordinances,
regulations or other similar enactments which the case involves.

(8) There shall be appended to the petition any briefs filed in the
trial court in support of the motion to dismiss.

(9) The certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(c) Caption and parties.—The parties in the trial court shall be named as
parties in the appellate court. If there are multiple defendants but the order for
which review is sought adjudicates the motion of only a single defendant, only
that defendant may file a petition for review.

(d) No supporting brief.—All contentions in support of a petition shall be
set forth in the body of the petition as prescribed by subparagraph (b)(v) of this
rule. No separate brief in support of the petition for review will be received, and
the prothonotary of the appellate court will refuse to file any petition for review to
which is annexed or appended any brief other than the briefs filed in the trial
court.

(e) Essential requisites of petition.—The failure of a petitioner to present
with accuracy, brevity, and clearness whatever is essential to a ready and
adequate understanding of the points requiring consideration will be a sufficient
reason for denying the petition.

(f) Effect of filing petition.—The filing of a petition for review shall not
automatically stay the proceedings before the trial court. A petitioner may file an
application for a stay in the trial or appellate court pending the determination of
the petition for review, or the trial or appellate court may issue a stay sua sponte.

(g) Answer to petition for review.—If the Commonwealth does not intend
to file an answer under this rule, it shall, within the time fixed by these rules for
filing an answer, file a letter stating that it does not intend to file an answer to the
petition for review. The failure to file an answer will not be construed as
concurrence in the petition for review. The appellate court may, however, direct
the Commonwealth to file an answer. An answer to a petition for review shall
contain the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(h) Pa.R.A.P. 1531—1571 do not apply to petitions for review filed under
this rule. Pa.R.A.P. 1514 does apply, except that no copy of the petition needs to
be served upon the Attorney General.

67
 (i) Grant of petition for review and transmission of record.—If the
petition for review is granted, the prothonotary of the appellate court shall
immediately give written notice of the entry of the order to the clerk of the trial
court and to each party who has appeared in the appellate court. The grant of the
petition for review shall operate as a stay of all trial court proceedings. The clerk
of the trial court shall docket the notice in the same manner as a notice of appeal
and shall mail that notice to all parties to the trial court proceeding. The certified
record shall be transmitted and filed in accordance with Chapter 19 (preparation
and transmission of the record and related matters). The times fixed by those
provisions for transmitting the record shall run from the date of the entry of the
order granting the petition for review. No party needs to file a separate notice of
appeal.

(j) Denial of petition for review.—If the petition for review is denied, the
prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately give written notice of the
order to the clerk of the trial court and to each party who has appeared in the
appellate court.]

Official Note: [The trial court’s determination and the procedure for determining a
motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds is set forth in Pa.R.Crim.P. 587. If
a trial court denies such a motion without expressly finding that the motion is
frivolous, the order is immediately appealable by means of a notice of appeal
under Pa.R.A.P. 313. If, however, the trial court finds the motion to be frivolous,
appellate review can be secured only if the appellate court grants a petition for
review. See Commonwealth v. Orie, 22 A.3d 1021 (Pa. 2011); Commonwealth v.
Brady, 508 A.2d 286 (Pa. 1986). If the Superior Court does not grant the petition
for review, the defendant may file a petition for allowance of appeal with the
Supreme Court.

Where the petition for review of the determination of frivolousness is
granted, the grant automatically initiates a separate appeal on the merits from the
order denying the pretrial motion seeking dismissal of criminal charges on
double jeopardy grounds.

A party may seek (or a court may sua sponte issue) a stay of the trial court
proceedings pending review of the frivolousness determination. Otherwise, the
trial court may proceed while the petition for review is pending. See Pa.R.A.P.
1701(d). Where the petition for review of the determination of frivolousness is
granted, the grant automatically stays further proceedings in the trial courts.]

68
 Pa.R.A.P. 1573 formerly provided for review of orders in which the court
finds an assertion of double jeopardy frivolous. The substance of the rule is now
found in Pa.R.A.P. 1311.

69
 (This is an entirely new chapter)

CHAPTER 16

SPECIALIZED REVIEW

IN GENERAL

Rule 1601. Scope of Chapter.
Rule 1602. Filing.
Rule 1603. Form and Content.
Rule 1604. Service
Rule 1605. Response to Petition.
Rule 1606. Further Review

SPECIFIC PETITIONS FOR SPECIALIZED REVIEW

Rule 1610. Review of Bail Orders
Rule 1611. Review of Special Prosecution Orders
Rule 1612. Review of Out-of-Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency
Rule 1613. Review of Orders Affecting the Duration of an Indicting Grand Jury

IN GENERAL

Rule 1601. Scope of Chapter.

This chapter provides a petition procedure for appellate review of certain discrete
issues. Generally, these matters are ancillary and/or preliminary to appellate review
under Chapters 9, 11, 13, or 15, but the chapter also is intended to provide the method
for initiating any otherwise-authorized form of appellate review that does not fall within
those chapters.

The procedure applicable under this chapter is provided in Pa.R.A.P. 1602-1605,
unless otherwise prescribed by statute or rule relating to a particular category of petition
for specialized review.

Official Note: Judicial review of government unit actions or inactions not otherwise
permitted under Chapters 9, 11, 13 or 15, including those enumerated in Pa.R.A.P.
1601, is available under Chapter 16 to the extent delineated in its provisions. The
document that initiates the case under Chapter 16 is called a petition for specialized
review. The “residuary” initiating document function previously assigned to Chapter 15
is now assigned to Chapter 16.

70
Rule 1602. Filing.

(a) Time for filing.—Unless a statute, rule, or order of a court provides for a
different time of filing a petition for specialized review, the petition for specialized review
shall be filed with the prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after the entry of
the order sought to be reviewed. The petition shall be deemed filed on the date mailed
if the petitioner complies with the requirements set forth in paragraph (b).

(b) Deemed received on date of mailing.—If the petition for specialized review
is transmitted to the prothonotary of the appellate court by means of first class, express,
or priority United States Postal Service mail, the petition shall be deemed received by
the prothonotary for the purposes of Pa.R.A.P. 121(a) on the date deposited in the
United States mail, as shown on a United States Postal Service Form 3817 Certificate
of Mailing, or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of
deposit can be verified.

The certificate of mailing or other similar Postal Service form from which the date
of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the Postal Service, shall show the
docket number of the matter in the trial court or other government unit and shall be
either enclosed with the petition or separately mailed to the prothonotary. Upon actual
receipt of the petition for specialized review the prothonotary of the appellate court shall
immediately stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date, or the date of earlier
deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this paragraph, shall constitute the
date of filing, which date shall be shown on the docket.

The prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately note the appellate
docket number assignment upon the petition and give written notice of the docket
number assignment in person or by first class mail to the government unit or clerk of the
trial court, to the petitioner and to the other persons named in the proof of service
accompanying the petition.

(c) Fee.—The petitioner, upon filing the petition for specialized review, shall
pay any fee therefor prescribed by Chapter 27.

(d) Entry of appearance.--Upon the filing of the petition for specialized review,
the prothonotary of the appellate court shall note on the record as counsel for the
petitioner the name of counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for
specialized review, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof
of service. The prothonotary shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties,
filed at any time within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record
of appearance. Thereafter a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn
without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an
appearance for the party.

71
Rule 1603. Form and Content.

(a) Caption and parties.—All parties to the proceeding in the trial court or
other government unit other than the petitioner shall be named as respondents.

(b) Title.—If the petition for specialized review is filed pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.
1610-1613, the title of the petition shall include a reference to the specific rule invoked.

(c) Content.—The petition for specialized review need not be set forth in
numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the following
(which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):

(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate court.

(2) the name of the party or person seeking review.

(3) the text of the order in question, and the date of its entry. If the
order is voluminous, it may, if more convenient, be appended to the petition. If
the petition seeks review of a deemed denial, it should so state.

(4) a concise statement of the case containing the facts necessary to
an understanding of the issue(s) presented.

(5) the question(s) presented, expressed in the terms and
circumstances of the case but without unnecessary detail.

(6) a concise statement of the reasons why the trial court or other
government unit erred.

(7) a copy of any opinions relating to the order sought to be reviewed,
including findings of fact and conclusions of law, as well as a copy of any other
record documents necessary to the appellate court’s review.

(8) the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(d) Supporting brief.—No supporting brief is permitted or required; the petition
for specialized review shall present all contentions and arguments relied on with
accuracy, brevity, and clarity.

(e) Length.—A petition for specialized review shall not exceed 9,000 words.
A petition for specialized review that does not exceed 20 pages when produced by a
word processor or typewriter shall be deemed to meet the 9,000 word limit. In all other
cases, the attorney or the unrepresented filing party shall include a certification that the

72
petition complies with the word count limit. The certificate may be based on the word
count of the word processing system used to prepare the brief.

Rule 1604. Service.

A copy of the petition for specialized review shall be served by the petitioner on
the trial court or other government unit that made the determination sought to be
reviewed. In matters involving the Commonwealth, the petitioner shall similarly serve a
copy upon the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. All parties before the trial court or
other government unit shall be served in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 121.

Rule 1605. Response to Petition.

(a) Time for filing.—A party may file and serve a response to a petition for
specialized review within 30 days of service of the petition. The response shall be
deemed filed on the date of mailing if first class, express, or priority United States Postal
Service mail is utilized.

(b) Content.—The response, which need not be set forth in numbered
paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, shall set forth any procedural, substantive, or
other argument or ground why the relief requested should be denied and shall comply
with the length limitation and the other provisions of Pa.R.A.P. 1603 to the extent
applicable, including the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127. No
separate motion to dismiss a petition for specialized review will be received. A party
entitled to file a response under this rule who does not intend to do so shall, within the
time fixed by these rules for filing a response, file a letter stating that a response to the
petition for specialized review will not be filed. The failure to file a response will not be
construed as concurrence in the petition for specialized review.

Rule 1606. Further Review.

A party wishing to seek review in the Supreme Court of a final order of an
intermediate appellate court on a petition for specialized review must file a timely
petition for allowance of appeal.

73
Rule 1610. Review of Bail Orders.

Where the trial court enters an order under Pa.R.A.P. 1762(b) granting or
denying release or modifying the conditions of release before sentence, a party may
seek review of that order by filing a petition for specialized review in the appellate court
that would have jurisdiction over the appeal from the judgment of sentence. A party
shall file the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127 with the petition for
specialized review.

Official Note: See Pa.R.A.P. 1762(a) and Pa.R.A.P. 1762(e).

74
Rule 1611. Review of Special Prosecution Orders.

(a) General rule.—Within ten days after the entry of the order sought to be
reviewed, a petition for specialized review may be filed in the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania seeking review of the following orders:

(1) An order relating to the supersession of a district attorney by an
Attorney General or by a court, or to the appointment, supervision,
administration or operation of a special prosecutor.

(2) An order relating to the convening or discharge of an investigating
grand jury or otherwise affecting its existence.

(3) An order entered in connection with the supervision, administration,
or operation of an investigating grand jury or otherwise directly affecting an
investigating grand jury or any investigation conducted by it.

(4) An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued by or
otherwise affecting the existence or operation of any investigating committee of
the General Assembly.

(5) An order of the type specified in subparagraphs (1) through (4) of
this paragraph which contains a statement by the trial court pursuant to 42
Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Chapter 13 shall not be
applicable to such an order.

A party shall file the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127 with the
petition for specialized review. Seven copies of any filings under this rule shall be filed
with the original. Pa.R.A.P. 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief) shall not be
applicable to an order reviewable under this rule.

(b) Opinion and record.— The Supreme Court on its own initiative may direct
that the trial court comply with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 or that the record be otherwise corrected
or supplemented.

(c) Distribution and disposition.—Upon receipt of the last filing that a party is
entitled to make under this rule, the filings shall be distributed by the Prothonotary to the
Supreme Court for its consideration. The Supreme Court may thereafter dispose of the
petition or set it down for argument.

(d) Interlocutory matters.—The interlocutory or final nature of an order shall
not be affected by this rule and, unless independent grounds appear for the review of an
interlocutory order, the interlocutory nature of the order will be a sufficient reason for

75
denying the petition. The denial of a petition shall be deemed a disposition on the
merits unless otherwise ordered or unless the petition expressly seeks permission to
appeal from an interlocutory order and asserts no other basis of jurisdiction on appeal.

(e) Remand of record.—Unless otherwise ordered:

(1) A certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court and the opinion
of the court, if one has been filed, shall be transmitted to the trial court forthwith
upon entry, notwithstanding the pendency of any application for reargument or
other proceeding affecting the judgment. This transmission shall be in lieu of the
remand of the record.

(2) Such transmission shall operate to vacate any order theretofore
entered pursuant to Chapter 17.

Official Note: This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for
Supreme Court supervision of special prosecutions and investigations, for example,
orders of the supervising judge of an investigating grand jury, findings of contempt
(whether civil or criminal) by witnesses called before such a grand jury, etc. Pa.R.A.P.
702(c) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(5) vest jurisdiction over such matters in the Supreme
Court. However, this rule is not applicable to review of investigating grand jury issues
that collaterally arise in a plenary criminal prosecution initiated by complaint,
information, or indictment. This rule requires that review be sought within ten days.
There is no delay for certification of the record, oral argument is ordinarily not available,
and the matter is ready for final disposition by the Supreme Court immediately upon
completion of the briefing schedule.

The term ‘‘investigating grand jury’’ in paragraph (a) includes a ‘‘multicounty
investigating grand jury’’ convened under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4544. The ‘‘independent
grounds’’ referred to in paragraph (d) include grounds for relief in the nature of
mandamus, prohibition, etc. and cases where the order is reviewable under the
standards of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b).

Failure to petition for specialized review under this rule from an interlocutory
order will ordinarily not constitute a waiver of objections to the order because, except as
prescribed by Pa.R.A.P. 311(g)(1)(ii), there is no requirement under these rules that a
party seek available interlocutory relief.

Under Pa.R.A.P. 1702(a), the Supreme Court or a justice thereof will not
entertain an application for relief under Pa.R.A.P. 1781 (stay pending action on
petitions) in connection with a special prosecution or investigation order until a petition
for specialized review has been filed under this rule.

76
Rule 1612. Review of Out-of-Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency.

(a) General rule.—If a court under the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301 et
seq., enters an order after an adjudication of delinquency of a juvenile pursuant to
Pa.R.J.C.P. 409(A)(2) and 515, which places the juvenile in an out-of-home overnight
placement in any agency or institution that shall provide care, treatment, supervision, or
rehabilitation of the juvenile, the juvenile may file a petition for specialized review. The
petition shall be filed within ten days of the order.

(b) Content.—A petition for specialized review under paragraph (a) shall
contain: (i) a specific description of any determinations made by the juvenile court; (ii)
the matters complained of; (iii) a concise statement of the reasons why the juvenile
court abused its discretion in ordering the out-of-home placement; (iv) the proposed
terms and conditions of an alternative disposition for the juvenile; (v) a request that the
official court reporter for the juvenile court transcribe the notes of testimony as required
by paragraph (g) of this rule; and (vi) the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P.
127. Any order(s) and opinion(s) relating to the out-of-home placement and the
transcript of the juvenile court’s findings shall be attached as appendices. The petition
shall be supported by a certificate of counsel to the effect that it is presented in good
faith and not for delay.

(c) Scope of review.

(1) The reviewing court shall not consider any challenge to the juvenile
court’s selection of a specific agency or specific institution as the site of the out-
of-home placement and instead may consider only a challenge to the fact that
the placement is out-of-home.

(2) The reviewing court shall not consider any challenge to the
underlying adjudication of delinquency.

(d) Response.—Any response shall be filed within ten days of service of the
petition, and no other pleading is authorized.

(e) Service.—A copy of the petition for specialized review and any answer
thereto shall be served on the judge of the juvenile court and the official court reporter
for the juvenile court. All parties in the juvenile court shall be served in accordance with
Pa.R.A.P. 121.

(f) Opinion of juvenile court.—Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for
specialized review under paragraph (a), if the judge who made the disposition of the
out-of-home placement did not state the reasons for such placement on the record at
the time of disposition pursuant to Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D), the judge shall file of record a

77
brief statement of the reasons for the determination or where in the record such reasons
may be found, within five days of service of the petition for specialized review.

(g) Transcription of Notes of Testimony.—Upon receipt of a copy of a petition
for specialized review under paragraph (a), the court reporter shall transcribe the notes
of testimony and deliver the transcript to the juvenile court within five business days. If
the transcript is not prepared and delivered in a timely fashion, the juvenile court shall
order the court reporter to transcribe the notes and deliver the notes to the juvenile
court, and may impose sanctions for violation of such an order. If the juvenile is
proceeding in forma pauperis, the juvenile shall not be charged for the cost of the
transcript.

(h) Non-waiver of objection to placement.—A failure to seek review under this
rule of the out-of-home placement shall not constitute a waiver of the juvenile’s right to
seek review of the placement in a notice of appeal filed by the juvenile from a
disposition after an adjudication of delinquency.

Official Note: This rule provides a mechanism for the expedited review of an order of
out-of-home placement entered pursuant to Pa.R.J.C.P. 515. Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D)
requires the judge who made the disposition of an out-of-home placement to place the
reasons for the out-of-home placement on the record at the time of the disposition, and
paragraph (f) of this rule is applicable only in the exceptional circumstance where the
judge who made the disposition of an out-of-home placement fails to comply with
Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D). The Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6352, sets forth the considerations
for a dispositional order following an adjudication of delinquency and the alternatives for
disposition. The standard for review of a dispositional order is an abuse of discretion.
See In the Interest of A.D., 771 A.2d 45 (Pa. Super. 2001) (en banc).

78
Rule 1613. Review of Order Affecting the Duration of an Indicting Grand Jury.

(a) General rule.—Within ten days after the entry of the order sought to be
reviewed, the attorney for the Commonwealth may file a petition for specialized review
in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania seeking review of the following orders affecting
the duration of an indicting grand jury:

(1) An order failing to grant an extension of term under Pa.R.Crim.P.
556.5(B); or

(2) An order of discharge under Pa.R.Crim.P. 556.5(C).

A party shall file the certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127 with the petition
for specialized review. Seven copies of any filings under this rule shall be filed with the
original. Pa.R.A.P. 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief) shall not be applicable to
an order reviewable under this rule.

(b) Opinion and record.—The Supreme Court on its own initiative may direct
that the trial court comply with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 (opinion in support of order) or that the
trial court supplement the record.

(c) The Supreme Court may dispose of the petition as filed or may set it down
for argument.

(d) Remand of record.—Unless otherwise ordered, a certified copy of the
judgment of the Supreme Court and the opinion of the court, if one has been filed, shall
be transmitted to the trial court forthwith upon entry, notwithstanding the pendency of
any application for reargument or other proceeding affecting the judgment. This
transmission shall be in lieu of the remand of the record.

Official Note: This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for
Supreme Court supervision of orders failing to extend or discharging indicting grand
juries under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 556.5.

79
Rule 1701. Effect of Appeal Generally.

(a) General rule.—Except as otherwise prescribed by these rules, after an
appeal is taken or review of a quasijudicial order is sought, the trial court or other
government unit may no longer proceed further in the matter.

(b) Authority of a trial court or [agency] other government unit after
appeal.—After an appeal is taken or review of a quasijudicial order is sought, the trial
court or other government unit may:

(1) Take such action as may be necessary to preserve the [status
quo] status quo, correct formal errors in papers relating to the matter, cause the
record to be transcribed, approved, filed, and transmitted, grant leave to appeal
in forma pauperis, grant supersedeas, and take other action permitted or
required by these rules or otherwise ancillary to the appeal or petition for review
proceeding.

(2) Enforce any order entered in the matter, unless the effect of the
order has been superseded as prescribed in this chapter.

(3) Grant reconsideration of the order which is the subject of the
appeal or petition, if:

(i) an application for reconsideration of the order is filed in the
trial court or other government unit within the time provided or prescribed
by law; and

(ii) an order expressly granting reconsideration of such prior
order is filed in the trial court or other government unit within the time
prescribed by these rules for the filing of a notice of appeal or petition for
review of a quasijudicial order with respect to such order, or within any
shorter time provided or prescribed by law for the granting of
reconsideration.

A timely order granting reconsideration under this paragraph shall render
inoperative any such notice of appeal or petition for review of a quasijudicial order
theretofore or thereafter filed or docketed with respect to the prior order. The petitioning
party shall and any party may file a [praecipe] praecipe with the prothonotary of any
court in which such an inoperative notice or petition is filed or docketed and the
prothonotary shall note on the docket that such notice or petition has been stricken
under this rule. Where a timely order of reconsideration is entered under this
paragraph, the time for filing a notice of appeal or petition for review begins to run anew
after the entry of the decision on reconsideration, whether or not that decision amounts

80
to a reaffirmation of the prior determination of the trial court or other government unit.
No additional fees shall be required for the filing of the new notice of appeal or petition
for review.

(4) Authorize the taking of depositions or the preservation of testimony
where required in the interest of justice.

(5) Take any action directed or authorized by an appellate court.

(6) Proceed further in any matter in which a non-appealable
interlocutory order has been entered, notwithstanding the filing of a notice of
appeal or a petition for review of the order.

(c) Limited to matters in dispute.—Where only a particular item, claim, or
assessment adjudged in the matter is involved in an appeal, or in a petition for review
proceeding relating to a quasijudicial order, the appeal or petition for review proceeding
shall operate to prevent the trial court or other government unit from proceeding further
with only such item, claim, or assessment, unless otherwise ordered by the trial court or
other government unit or by the appellate court or a judge thereof as necessary to
preserve the rights of the appellant.

(d) [Certain] Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—The filing of an
original jurisdiction petition for review [(except a petition relating to a quasijudicial
order)] shall not affect the power or authority of the government unit to proceed further
in the matter, but the government unit shall be subject to any orders entered by the
appellate court or a judge thereof pursuant to this chapter.

(e) Petitions for specialized review—The filing of a petition for
specialized review under Chapter 16 shall not affect the power or authority of the
trial court or other government unit to proceed further in the matter, but the
provisions of this chapter relating to supersedeas of the order of the trial court or
other government unit shall apply.

Official Note: The following statutory provisions relate to supersedeas generally:

42 Pa.C.S. § 702(c) (supersedeas) provides that, except as otherwise prescribed
by general rule, a petition for permission to appeal under that section shall not stay the
proceedings before the trial court or other government unit, unless the trial court or
other government unit or the appellate court or a judge thereof shall so order. See also
Pa.R.A.P. 1313 (effect of filing petition).

42 Pa.C.S. § 5105(e) (supersedeas) provides that an appeal shall operate as a
supersedeas to the extent and upon the conditions provided or prescribed by law, and

81
that unless a supersedeas is entered, no appeal from an order concerning the validity of
a will or other instrument or the right to the possession of or to administer any real or
personal property shall suspend the powers or prejudice the acts of the appointive
judicial officer, personal representative, or other person acting thereunder.

Paragraph (a) codifies a well-established principle. See, [e.g.], for example,
Merrick Estate, 247 A.2d 786, 787 (Pa. 1968); Corace v. Balint, 210 A.2d 882, 889 (Pa.
1965). Pa.R.A.P. 5102 saves the provisions of Section 426 of the Pennsylvania
Workers' Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 871, which permit a rehearing by the agency
under certain circumstances during the pendency of an appeal. Pa.R.A.P. 311(h)
(further proceedings in trial court) provides that paragraph (a) is not applicable where an
appeal as of right is taken from interlocutory orders relating to attachments,
custodianships, receiverships, and injunctions, [etc., thus making clear that the
procedure for seeking appellate review of these collateral matters does not impair
the power of the trial court to continue with the merits of the case] and that when
such matters are appealed, the trial court may nonetheless proceed with the
underlying case.

Subparagraph (b)(1) sets forth an obvious power of the trial court or other
government unit under these rules to take actions to preserve the status quo and to
clarify or correct an order or verdict. The power to clarify or correct does not extend to
substantive modifications. See Pa. Indus. Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania PUC, 653
A.2d 1336, 1344-45 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995), aff'd, 670 A.2d 1152 (Pa. 1996). Examples of
permissible actions to preserve the [status quo] status quo are those "auxiliary to the
appellate process, such as a supersedeas or injunction." Id. Examples of permissible
corrections are "non-substantial technical amendments to an order, changes in the form
of a decree, and modification of a verdict to add prejudgment interest." Id. at 1344.
"Such actions have no effect on the appeal or petition for review and cannot prompt a
new appealable issue." Id. at 1345.

Among the permissible "corrections" is the addition or modification of contractual
or statutory prejudgment interest, which is an element of contract damages. In such
cases, the award of such interest is mandatory and not discretionary. TruServ Corp. v.
Morgan's Tool & Supply Co. Inc., 39 A.3d 253, 264 (Pa. 2012). Accordingly, even
though the amount of a verdict is changed by the addition of prejudgment interest, the
verdict has been "corrected" and not "modified."

The Supreme Court has held that, so long as a motion for attorneys' fees has
been timely filed, a trial court may act on that motion under [subdivision]
subparagraph (b)(1) even after an appeal has been taken. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia
Motors Am., Inc., 34 A.3d 1, 48 (Pa. 2011). Thus, unlike the court actions discussed in
[Pa. Indus. Energy Coalition] Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition, an award
of attorneys' fees constitutes a separately appealable order that would be reviewable

82
upon filing of a timely separate notice of appeal, measured from the date the fee award
order was entered.

Generally an appeal does not operate as a supersedeas of an order of a
government [agency action] unit.

Subparagraph (b)(3) is intended to [handle] address the troublesome question
of the effect of an application for reconsideration on the appeal process. [The rule (1)
permits the trial court or other government unit to grant reconsideration if action
is taken during the applicable appeal period, which is not intended to include the
appeal period for cross-appeals, or, during any shorter applicable
reconsideration period under the practice below, and (2) eliminates the possibility
that the power to grant reconsideration could be foreclosed by the taking of a
"snap" appeal. The better procedure under this rule will be for a party seeking
reconsideration to file an application for reconsideration below and a notice of
appeal, etc. If the application lacks merit the trial court or other government unit
may deny the application by the entry of an order to that effect or by inaction. The
prior appeal paper will remain in effect, and appeal will have been taken without
the necessity to watch the calendar for the running of the appeal period. If the
trial court or other government unit fails to enter an order "expressly granting
reconsideration" (an order that "all proceedings shall stay" will not suffice) within
the time prescribed by these rules for seeking review, paragraph (a) becomes
applicable and the power of the trial court or other government unit to act on the
application for reconsideration is lost.] By statute, a trial court has only 30 days
from the entry of a final order to “modify or rescind” its order. 42 Pa.C.S. § 5505;
see also Key Automotive Equip. Specialists v. Abernethy, 636 A.2d 1126, 1128
(Pa. Super. 1994) (recognizing that the statute does not apply to limit
reconsideration of interlocutory orders). Under this rule, an express
determination by a trial court or other government unit within 30 days that it is
reconsidering its earlier order satisfies the statutory requirement; the trial court
or other government unit does not need to grant the relief sought in the
application for reconsideration within the 30 days. The 30-day period protects
against the risk that someone could take a “snap” appeal and foreclose
reconsideration, but, because the clock is running on the appeal period and the
period for reconsideration simultaneously, filing the notice of appeal at the same
time as or shortly after the motion for reconsideration will protect against waiver
of the appeal if the trial court or other government unit fails to act.

Subparagraph (b)(3) provides that: "[W]here a timely order of reconsideration is
entered under this paragraph, the time for filing a notice of appeal or petition for review
begins to run anew after entry of the decision on reconsideration." Pursuant to
Pa.R.C.P. 1930.2, [effective July 1, 1994, where] if reconsideration from a domestic
relations order has been timely granted, a reconsidered decision or an order directing

83
additional testimony must be entered within 120 days of the entry of the order granting
reconsideration or the motion shall be deemed denied. See Pa.R.C.P. 1930.2(c), (d),
and (e). The date from which the appeal period will be measured following a
reconsidered decision in a domestic relations matter is governed by Pa.R.C.P.
1930.2(d) and (e).

[Under the 1996 amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure governing
post-sentence practice, see] Pa.R.Crim.P. 720 and 721[,] set fixed times for
reconsideration of a decision on a defendant's post-sentence motion or on a
Commonwealth motion to modify sentence, and reconsideration of a deemed denial
is prohibited. [must take place within the time limits set by those rules, and t]The
judge may not vacate sentence or "grant reconsideration" pursuant to subparagraph
(b)(3) in order to extend the time limits for disposition of those motions. [Pa.R.Crim.P.
720 and 721 resolved questions raised about the interplay between this
subparagraph and post-trial criminal practice. See, e.g., Commonwealth v.
Corson, 444 A.2d 170 (Pa. Super. 1982).]

Paragraphs (d) and (e) explain that original jurisdiction petitions for review
and petitions for specialized review do not come within Pa.R.A.P. 1701;
accordingly, any stay or supersedeas must be sought under other provisions of
Chapter 17.

Subparagraph (b)(5) recognizes the authority that an appellate court has to retain
jurisdiction while asking a trial court or other government unit to engage in factfinding,
an authority that is particularly important when questions arise in an appellate court
about the course of events in the trial court or when representation by counsel becomes
an issue on appeal.

84
Rule 1702. Stay Ancillary to Appeal.

(a) General rule.—Applications for relief under this chapter will not be
entertained by an appellate court or a judge thereof until after a notice of appeal has
been filed in the [lower] trial court [and docketed in the appellate court] or a petition
for review or petition for specialized review has been filed.

(b) Proceedings on petition for allowance of appeal, petition for permission
to appeal, or petition for specialized review.—Applications for relief under this
chapter may be made without the prior filing of a petition for allowance of appeal, [or]
petition for permission to appeal, or petition for specialized review, but the failure to
effect timely filing of such a petition, or the denial of such a petition, shall automatically
vacate any ancillary order entered under this chapter. In such a case, the clerk of the
court in which the ancillary order was entered shall, on [praecipe] praecipe of any
party to the matter, enter a formal order under this rule vacating such ancillary order.

(c) Supreme Court review of appellate court supersedeas and stay
determinations.—No appeal, petition for allowance of appeal, [or] petition for review, or
petition for specialized review need be filed in the Supreme Court in connection with
an [re]application under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 3315 [(review of stay orders of appellate
courts)].

Official Note: [Based on former Superior Court Rule 53 and Commonwealth Court
Rule 112A, which required the taking of an appeal prior to an application for
supersedeas or other interlocutory order. Subdivision (b) is new and is added in
recognition of the fact that the drafting of a petition for allowance of appeal or a
petition for permission to appeal in the form required by these rules may not be
possible prior to the time when an application for supersedeas may have to be
made in the appellate court in order to avoid substantial harm.] In any instance in
which a party seeks a stay or supersedeas from a trial court or government unit,
that party can seek relief from the appellate court that has jurisdiction of the
matter and can seek review of that intermediate appellate court’s decision from
the Supreme Court.

85
Rule 1704. Application in a Capital Case for a Stay of Execution or for Review of
an Order Granting or Denying a Stay of Execution.

Prior notice of the intent to file an application in a capital case for a stay or review
of an order granting or denying a stay of execution shall be provided to the Prothonotary
of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, if prior notice is practicable.

The application for stay or review shall set forth the following:

1. The date the warrant issued; the date and nature of the order that
prompted the issuance of the warrant; and the date the execution is scheduled, if
a date has been set;

2. Whether any direct or collateral challenges to the underlying
conviction are pending, and, if so, in what court(s) or tribunal(s);

3. Whether any other applications for a stay of the pending execution
have been filed, and, if so, in what court(s) or tribunal(s), when, and the status of
the application(s);

4. The grounds for relief and the showing made to the trial court of
entitlement to a stay under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(c), if applicable;

5. A statement certifying that emergency action is required and setting
forth a description of the emergency.

All dockets, pleadings, and orders that are referred to in 1-5 above must be
attached to the application. If any of the information provided in the application changes
while the motion is pending, the party seeking the stay or review must file with the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court written notice of the change within 24 hours.

No notice of appeal, [or] petition for review, or petition for specialized review
needs to be filed in order to file an application under this rule.

86
Rule 1762. Release in Criminal Matters.

(a) Bail when an appeal is pending—Applications relating to bail when an
appeal is pending shall ordinarily first be presented to the [lower] trial court[,] and shall
be governed by the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure. If the [lower] trial court
denies relief, a party may seek relief in the appellate court by filing an application,
pursuant to [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 123, ancillary to the pending appeal.

(b) Bail when no appeal is pending.—Applications relating to bail when no
appeal is pending:

(1) Applications relating to bail when no appeal is pending shall first be
presented to the [lower] trial court[,] and shall be governed by the Pennsylvania
Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(2) An order relating to bail shall be subject to review pursuant to
Chapter [15] 16 [(judicial review of governmental determinations). Any
answer shall be in accordance with Rule 1516 (other pleadings
allowed), and no other pleading is authorized. Rule 1517 (applicable rules
of pleading) and Rule 1531 (intervention) through 1551 (scope of review)
shall not be applicable to a petition for review filed under this paragraph.]

[(c) Content. An application for relief under subdivision (a) or a petition
for review under subdivision (b) shall set forth specifically and clearly the matters
complained of and a description of any determinations made by the lower court.
Any order and opinions relating to the bail determination shall be attached as
appendices.

(d) Service. A copy of the application for relief or the petition for review
and any answer thereto shall be served on the judge of the lower court. All parties
in the lower court shall be served in accordance with Rule 121(b) (service of all
papers required). The Attorney General of Pennsylvania need not be served in
accordance with Rule 1514(c) (service), unless the Attorney General is a party in
the lower court.]

[(e)](c) Entry of Bail.—Bail shall be entered in the [lower] trial court
pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.

[(f)](d) Extradition matters.—Relief relating to bail in extradition matters
shall be governed by the procedures prescribed by this rule.

[(g)](e) Opinion of [lower] trial court.—Upon receipt of a copy of an
application for relief under [subdivision] paragraph (a) or a petition for specialized

87
review under [subdivision] paragraph (b) that does not include an explanation for the
bail determination, the judge who made the bail determination [below] being reviewed
shall forthwith file of record a brief statement of the reasons for the determination or
where in the record such reasons may be found.

[Official Note: Prior to sentence, Rule 1702 (stay ancillary to appeal) is
satisfied by the filing of a plenary petition for review of the order of the lower
court granting or denying release. After sentence a separate plenary filing is no
longer necessary because the application for release pending appeal may be
made as a matter ancillary to the appeal from the order imposing sentence.

The reference in Subdivision (c) to the rulings complained of is not
intended to suggest that the appellate court may ignore objective standards for
release such as those established by Pa.R.Crim.P. 530.]

88
 [REVIEW OF DISPOSITIONAL ORDER FOR OUT OF HOME PLACEMENT IN
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY MATTERS]

Rule 1770. [Review of Out of Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency Matters]
Reserved.

[(a) General rule.--If a court under the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et
seq., enters an order after an adjudication of delinquency of a juvenile pursuant
to Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure 409(A)(2) and 515, which places the juvenile
in an out of home overnight placement in any agency or institution that shall
provide care, treatment, supervision or rehabilitation of the juvenile (‘‘Out of
Home Placement’’), the juvenile may seek review of that order pursuant to a
petition for review under Chapter 15 (judicial review of governmental
determinations). The petition shall be filed within ten days of the said order.

(b) Content.--A petition for review under subdivision (a) shall contain the
following:

(1) a specific description of any determinations made by the
juvenile court;

(2) the matters complained of;

(3) a concise statement of the reasons why the juvenile court
abused its discretion in ordering the Out of Home Placement;

(4) the proposed terms and conditions of an alternative
disposition for the juvenile; and

(5) a request that the official court reporter for the juvenile court
transcribe the notes of testimony as required by paragraph (g) of this Rule.

Any order(s) and opinion(s) relating to the Out of Home Placement and the
transcript of the juvenile court’s findings shall be attached as appendices. The
petition shall be supported by a certificate of counsel to the effect that it is
presented in good faith and not for delay. The petition shall contain the
certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

(c) Objection to specific agency or institution, or underlying
adjudication of delinquency, is not permitted.

89
 (1) A petition for review under paragraph (a) shall not challenge
the specific agency or specific institution that is the site of the Out of Home
Placement and instead shall be limited to the Out of Home Placement itself.

(2) A petition for review under paragraph (a) shall not challenge
the underlying adjudication of delinquency.

(d) Answer.--Any answer shall be filed within ten days of service of the
petition, and no other pleading is authorized. Any answer shall contain the
certificate of compliance required by Pa.R.A.P. 127. Pa.R.A.P. 1517 (applicable
rules of pleading) and Pa.R.A.P. 1531 (intervention) through 1551 (scope of
review) shall not be applicable to a petition for review filed under paragraph (a).

(e) Service.--A copy of the petition for review and any answer thereto
shall be served on the judge of the juvenile court and the official court reporter
for the juvenile court. All parties in the juvenile court shall be served in
accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 121(b) (service of all papers required). The Attorney
General of Pennsylvania need not be served in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 1514(c)
(service), unless the Attorney General is a party in the juvenile court.

(f) Opinion of juvenile court.--Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for
review under paragraph (a), if the judge who made the disposition of the Out of
Home Placement did not state the reasons for such placement on the record at
the time of disposition pursuant to Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512 (D), the
judge shall file of record a brief statement of the reasons for the determination or
where in the record such reasons may be found, within five days of service of the
petition for review.

(g) Transcription of Notes of Testimony.--Upon receipt of a copy of a
petition for review under paragraph (a), the court reporter shall transcribe the
notes of testimony and deliver the transcript to the juvenile court within five
business days. If the transcript is not prepared and delivered in a timely fashion,
the juvenile court shall order the court reporter to transcribe the notes and deliver
the notes to the juvenile court, and may impose sanctions for violation of such an
order. If the juvenile is proceeding in forma pauperis, the juvenile shall not be
charged for the cost of the transcript. Chapter 19 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure shall not otherwise apply to petitions for review filed under this Rule.

(h) Non-waiver of objection to placement.--A failure to seek review under
this rule of the Out of Home Placement shall not constitute a waiver of the
juvenile’s right to seek review of the placement in a notice of appeal filed by the
juvenile from a disposition after an adjudication of delinquency.]

90
Official Note: [This Rule provides a mechanism for the expedited review of an
order of Out of Home Placement entered pursuant to Rule of Juvenile Court
Procedure 515. Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512(D) requires the judge who
made the disposition of an Out of Home Placement to place the reasons for an
Out of Home Placement on the record at the time of the disposition, and
paragraph (f) of this Rule is only applicable in the exceptional circumstance
where the judge who made the disposition of an Out of Home Placement fails to
comply with Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512(D). The Juvenile Act, 42
Pa.C.S. § 6352, sets forth the considerations for a dispositional order following
an adjudication of delinquency and the alternatives for disposition. The standard
for review of a dispositional order is an abuse of discretion. See In the Interest of
A.D., 771 A.2d 45 (Pa. Super. 2001) (en banc).]

Pa.R.A.P. 1770 formerly provided for a petition for review of an out-of-home
placement in juvenile delinquency matters. The substance of that rule is now
found in Pa.R.A.P. 1612.

91
Rule 1781. Stay Pending Action on Petition for Review or Petition for Specialized
Review.

(a) Application to government unit.—Application for a stay or supersedeas of
an order or other determination of any government unit pending review in an appellate
court on petition for review or petition for specialized review shall ordinarily be made
in the first instance to the government unit.

(b) Contents of application for stay or supersedeas.—An application for stay
or supersedeas of an order or other determination of a government unit, or for an order
granting an injunction pending review, or for relief in the nature of peremptory
mandamus, may be made to the appellate court or to a judge thereof, but the
application shall show that application to the government unit for the relief sought is not
practicable, or that application has been made to the government unit and denied, with
the reasons given by it for the denial, or that the action of the government unit did not
afford the relief [which] that the applicant had requested. The application shall also
show the reasons for the relief requested and the facts relied upon, and if the facts are
subject to dispute, the application shall be supported by sworn or verified statements or
copies thereof. With the application shall be filed such parts, if any, of the record as are
relevant to the relief sought. The application shall contain the certificate of compliance
required by Pa.R.A.P. 127.

c) Notice and action by court.—Upon such notice to the government unit as
is required by Pa.R.A.P. 123, [(applications for relief)] the appellate court, or a judge
thereof, may grant an order of stay or supersedeas, including the grant of an injunction
pending review or relief in the nature of peremptory mandamus, upon such terms and
conditions, including the filing of security, as the court or the judge thereof may
prescribe. Where a statute requires that security be filed as a condition to obtaining a
supersedeas, the court shall require adequate security.

Official Note: See generally Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas
Consumers Group, 467 A.2d 805 (Pa. 1983), for the criteria for the issuance of a stay
pending appeal.

92
Rule 1911. Request for Transcript.

(a) General rule.—The appellant shall request any transcript required under
this chapter in the manner and make any necessary payment or deposit therefor in the
amount and within the time prescribed by Rules 4001 et seq. of the Pennsylvania Rules
of Judicial Administration.

(b) Cross-appeals.—Where a cross-appeal has been taken, the cross-
appellant shall also have a duty to pay for and cause the transcript to be filed and shall
share the initial expense equally with all other appellants.

(c) Form.—The request for transcript may be endorsed on, incorporated into,
or attached to the notice of appeal or other document and shall be in substantially the
following form:

[Caption]

A (notice of appeal) (petition for review) (petition for specialized review)
(other appellate paper, as appropriate) having been filed in this matter, the
official court reporter is hereby requested to produce, certify and file the
transcript in this matter in conformity with Rule 1922 of the Pennsylvania
Rules of Appellate Procedure.
_____________________
Signature

(d) Effect of failure to comply.—If the appellant fails to take the action required
by these rules and the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration for the preparation
of the transcript, the appellate court may take such action as it deems appropriate,
which may include dismissal of the appeal.

Official Note: For the Uniform Rules Governing Court Reporting and Transcripts, see
Pa.R.J.A. No. 4001-4016. Local rules should also be consulted as to deposit
requirements, fees, and additional procedures.

93
Rule 2702. Multiple Parties.

Where a joint notice of appeal is filed in the [lower] trial court[,] or docketed in
the appellate court, or a joint petition for allowance of appeal is filed under [Rule]
Pa.R.A.P. 512 [(joint appeals)], or a joint petition for review is filed under [Rule]
Pa.R.A.P. 512 or otherwise, or a joint petition for permission to appeal is filed under
[Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1312(e) [(multiple petitioners)], or a joint petition for specialized
review is filed, or where any other filing under these rules is effected jointly as
permitted by these rules, only one fee is payable, regardless of the number of parties to
the filing.

Official Note: This rule abolishes the “number of appellants times number of appellees”
practice [heretofore] previously followed in the computation of appellate filing fees.

94
Rule 3307. Applications for Leave to File Original Process.

(a) Scope.—This rule applies only to matters within the original jurisdiction of
the Supreme Court under 42 Pa.C.S. § 721 [(original jurisdiction)] which are not in
the nature of mandamus or prohibition ancillary to matters within the appellate
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Applications for relief pursuant to or ancillary to the
appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, including relief which may be obtained in
the Supreme Court by petition for review or petition for specialized review, are
governed by Article I [(preliminary provisions)] and Article II [(appellate procedure)]
and may be filed without an application under this rule. [See also] See also [Rule]
Pa.R.A.P. 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief).

(b) General rule.—The initial pleading in any original action or proceeding
shall be prefaced by an application for leave to file such pleading, showing service upon
all parties to such action or proceeding. The matter will be docketed when the
application for leave to file is filed with the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court. The
application shall be deemed filed on the date received by the prothonotary unless it was
on an earlier date deposited in the United States mail and sent by first class, express, or
priority United States Postal Service mail as shown on a United States Postal Service
Form 3817 Certificate of Mailing or other similar United States Postal Service form from
which the date of deposit can be verified. The certificate of mailing or similar Postal
Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the
Postal Service, shall show the docket number of the matter, if known, and shall be
either enclosed with the application or separately mailed to the prothonotary.
Appearances shall be filed as in other original actions. An adverse party may file an
answer no later than 14 days after service of the application. The answer shall be
deemed filed on the date of mailing if first class, express, or priority United States Postal
Service mail is utilized. An adverse party who does not intend to file an answer to the
application shall, within the time fixed by these rules for the filing of an answer, file a
letter stating that an answer to the application will not be filed. Upon receipt of the
answer to the application, or a letter stating that no answer will be filed, from each party
entitled to file such, the application, pleadings, and answer to the application, if any,
shall be distributed by the [P]prothonotary to the Supreme Court for its consideration.

(c) Disposition of application.—The Supreme Court may thereafter grant or
deny the application or set it down for argument. Additional pleadings may be filed, and
subsequent proceedings had, as the Supreme Court may direct. If the application is
denied, the matter shall be transferred to the appropriate court by the [P]prothonotary in
the same manner and with the same effect as matters are transferred under [Rule]
Pa.R.A.P. 751 [(transfer of erroneously filed cases)].

[Official Note: Based on U.S. Supreme Court Rule 9. Presumably this rule will
seldom be invoked, since questions concerning the scope of the original

95
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may usually be avoided by filing the action in a
lower court which clearly has subject matter jurisdiction, and immediately
thereafter making application for transfer to the Supreme Court under Rule 3309
(applications for extraordinary relief).]

96
 [REVIEW OF SPECIAL PROSECUTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS]

Rule 3331. [Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations] Reserved.

[(a) General rule.—Within the time specified in Rule 1512(b)(3) (special
provisions), any of the following orders shall be subject to review pursuant to
Chapter 15 (judicial review of governmental determinations):

(1) An order relating to the supersession of a district attorney by
an Attorney General or by a court or to the appointment, supervision,
administration or operation of a special prosecutor.

(2) An order relating to the convening or discharge of an
investigating grand jury or otherwise affecting its existence.

(3) An order entered in connection with the supervision,
administration or operation of an investigating grand jury or otherwise
directly affecting an investigating grand jury or any investigation
conducted by it.

(4) An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued
by or otherwise affecting the existence or operation of any investigating
committee of the General Assembly.

(5) An order of the type specified in Paragraphs (1) through (4) of
this subdivision which contains a statement by the lower court pursuant to
42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Chapter 13
(interlocutory appeals by permission) shall not be applicable to such an
order.

The petition shall conform to Rule 123(a) (contents of application for relief)
and any answer to the petition shall conform to Rule 1516(a) (general rule). A
party entitled to file an answer under this rule who does not intend to do so shall,
within the time fixed by these rules for the filing of an answer, file a letter stating
that an answer to the petition for review will not be filed. Rule 1517 (applicable
rules of pleading) through Rule 1551 (scope of review) shall not be applicable to a
petition for review filed under this rule. Seven copies of any papers filed under
this rule shall be filed with the original. Rule 3309 (applications for extraordinary
relief) shall not be applicable to an order reviewable under this rule.

(b) Briefs and record. The petitioner may file and serve a brief in support
of the petition for review with the petition for review. Any other party may file and
serve an answer and supporting brief within 14 days of service of the petition.

97
Each party shall append to the petition or answer as much of the record below as
the party desires to bring to the attention of the court. The Supreme Court on its
own initiative may direct that the lower court comply with Rule 1925 (opinion in
support of order) or that the record be otherwise corrected or supplemented.

(c) Distribution and disposition. Upon receipt of the last paper that a
party is entitled to file under this rule, the papers filed under this rule shall be
distributed by the Prothonotary to the Supreme Court for its consideration. The
Supreme Court may thereafter dispose of the petition or set it down for argument.

(d) Interlocutory matters. The interlocutory or final nature of an order
shall not be affected by this rule and, unless independent grounds appear for the
review of an interlocutory order, the interlocutory nature of the order will be a
sufficient reason for denying the petition. The denial of a petition shall be deemed
a disposition on the merits unless otherwise ordered or unless the petition
expressly seeks permission to appeal from an interlocutory order and asserts no
other basis of jurisdiction on appeal.

(e) Remand of record. Unless otherwise ordered:

(1) A certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court and the
opinion of the court, if one has been filed, shall be transmitted to the lower
court forthwith upon entry, notwithstanding the pendency of any
application for reargument or other proceeding affecting the judgment.
This transmission shall be in lieu of the remand of the record.

(2) Such transmission shall operate to vacate any order
theretofore entered pursuant to Chapter 17 (effect of appeals;
supersedeas and stays).]

Official Note: [This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for
Supreme Court supervision of special prosecutions and investigations, e.g.
orders of the supervising judge of an investigating grand jury, findings of
contempt (whether civil or criminal) by witnesses called before such a grand jury,
etc. Rule 702(c) (supervision of special prosecutions or investigations) and 42
Pa.C.S. § 722(5) (direct appeals from courts of common pleas) vest jurisdiction
over such matters in the Supreme Court. However, this rule is not applicable to
review of investigating grand jury issues that collaterally arise in a plenary
criminal prosecution initiated by complaint, information or indictment. Rule
1512(b)(3) (special provisions) requires that review be sought within ten days.
Essentially the procedure is analogous to the review of a bail order under Rule
1762 (release in criminal matters). There is no delay for certification of the
record, oral argument is ordinarily not available, and the matter is ready for final

98
disposition by the Supreme Court immediately upon completion of the briefing
schedule. The term ‘‘investigating grand jury’’ in Subdivision (a) includes a
‘‘multicounty investigating grand jury’’ convened under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4544
(convening multicounty investigating grand jury). The ‘‘independent grounds’’
referred to in Subdivision (d) include grounds for relief in the nature of
mandamus, prohibition, etc. and cases where the order is reviewable under the
standards of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Failure to
petition for review under this rule from an interlocutory order will ordinarily not
constitute a waiver of objections to the order since, except as prescribed by Rule
311(g)(1)(ii) (Waiver of objections), there is no requirement under these rules that
a party seek available interlocutory relief.

Under Rule 1702(a) (stay ancillary to appeal), the Supreme Court or a
justice thereof will not entertain an application for relief under Rule 1781 (stay
pending action on petition for review) in connection with a special prosecution or
investigation order until a petition for review has been filed under this rule.]

Pa.R.A.P. 3331 formerly provided for a petition for review of orders relating
to special prosecutions or investigations. The substance of the rule is now found
in Pa.R.A.P. 1611.

99