Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-11910
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-00971-AT
DANIEL P. HARGROVE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
C. CAPELA,
#6022; Atlanta Police Department Inc.,
ERIKA SHIELDS,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 4, 2020)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, LAGOA and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Daniel Hargrove appeals pro se the dismissal without prejudice of his
complaint for failure to comply with an order to submit an amended application to
proceed in forma pauperis or to pay a filing fee. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Hargrove
disregarded a warning that his failure to comply with the order would result in the
dismissal of his complaint, and he failed to object to a magistrate judge’s
recommendation to dismiss. On appeal, Hargrove has abandoned any challenge to
the dismissal by failing to identify an error by the district court. See Hamilton v.
Southland Christian Sch., Inc., 680 F.3d 1316, 1318–19 (11th Cir. 2012). Instead,
he demands that we enter judgment in his favor. Because Hargrove fails to explain
how the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed his complaint without
prejudice, see Dynes v. Army Air Force Exch. Serv., 720 F.2d 1495, 1499 (11th
Cir. 1983), we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
2