Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-444.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUMIZEN.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-444.]
(No. 2019-0217—Submitted February 7, 2020—Decided February 11, 2020.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
____________________
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Scott Andrew Rumizen, Attorney
Registration No. 0058561, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 27, 2019, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the
practice of law for a period of two years, with eighteen months stayed on
conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, 156 Ohio St.3d
575, 2019-Ohio-2519, 130 N.E.3d 283.
O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,
and STEWART, JJ., concur.
________________________