Master v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-006V UNPUBLISHED TUSHAR MASTER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 27, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On January 2, 2019, Tushar Master filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”), Miller-Fisher syndrome variant, as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on January 18, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On March 27, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes “that petitioner suffered GBS/MFS following a 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). flu vaccine within the Table time period, and there is not a preponderance of the medical evidence that petitioner’s GBS/MFS was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccination.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that “[t]he claim also meets the statutory severity requirements because petitioner experienced sequelae of his GBS/MFS for more than six months.” Id. Therefore, Respondent states that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2