Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Case: 19-1671 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRNETX INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2019-1671 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,679. ______________________ ON PETITIONS FOR EN BANC REHEARING ______________________ NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, for appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, MICHAEL WOLFE, DANIEL ZEILBERGER. DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing Case: 19-1671 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2020 2 VIRNETX INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. en banc for appellee. Also represented by THEODORE M. FOSTER, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. MELISSA N. PATTERSON, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for intervenor. Also represented by COURTNEY DIXON, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH; THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, BRIAN RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Of- fice of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM. ORDER Combined petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc were separately filed by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Cisco Systems, Inc. The petitions were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal and were denied by the panel by separate order. The petitions for rehearing en banc were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petitions for rehearing en banc are denied. * Circuit Judge Stoll did not participate. Case: 19-1671 Document: 51 Page: 3 Filed: 05/13/2020 VIRNETX INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 3 The mandate of the court will issue on May 20, 2020. FOR THE COURT May 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court