NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN DAVID TORRES-VASQUEZ, No. 19-71560
Petitioner, Agency No. A203-290-712
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 2, 2020**
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Juan David Torres-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying a waiver of inadmissibility.
We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision denying a
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1)(B), where Torres-Vasquez
does not raise a colorable due process claim or question of law. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Mendoza v. Holder, 623 F.3d 1299, 1302 (9th Cir. 2010). We
also lack jurisdiction to review Torres-Vasquez’s unexhausted contention that the
IJ should have allowed him additional opportunity to submit corroborating
evidence. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court
“lack[s] jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s
administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).
Torres-Vasquez’s motion for a stay of removal is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 19-71560
Juan Torres-Vasquez v. William Barr
Combined Opinion