NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY N. LEONARD, No. 19-15690
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00549-RCJ-CBC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN NAUGHTON, Dr.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 8, 2020**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Nevada state prisoner Gregory N. Leonard appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims for
deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and equal protection. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113,
1118 (9th Cir. 2012). We reverse and remand.
The district court dismissed Leonard’s action because Leonard failed to
allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. However, Leonard alleged that
defendants discontinued his pain medication and prescribed other medication that
was known to be harmful to dialysis patients, despite Leonard’s objections, and
that Leonard suffered harm as a result. These allegations, liberally construed, are
“sufficient to warrant ordering [defendants] to file an answer.” Id. at 1116. We
reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
2 19-15690