United States v. Demarcus Miller

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 07, 2006 No. 06-10477 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 00-00131-CR-ORL-22-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMARCUS MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (September 7, 2006) Before BLACK, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Peter Warren Kenny, counsel for Demarcus Miller, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s revocation of probation and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2