United States v. Demarcus Miller

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPT 07, 2006
No. 06-10477 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-00131-CR-ORL-22-KRS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEMARCUS MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________

(September 7, 2006)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Warren Kenny, counsel for Demarcus Miller, in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed

a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment

of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Miller’s revocation of probation and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2