People ex rel. Bush v Awopetu |
2020 NY Slip Op 05378 |
Decided on October 2, 2020 |
Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 2, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
756 KAH 19-01485
v
A. AWOPETU, SUPERINTENDENT, LIVINGSTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
HAYDEN DADD, CONFLICT DEFENDER, GENESEO (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (BEEZLY J. KIERNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Robert B. Wiggins, A.J.), dated May 3, 2019 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because petitioner concedes that he has been released to parole supervision, the appeal has been rendered moot (see People ex rel. Sabino v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 178 AD3d 1446, 1447 [4th Dept 2019]; People ex rel. Luck v Squires, 173 AD3d 1767, 1767 [4th Dept 2019]). We conclude that the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see People ex rel. Winters v Crowley, 166 AD3d 1525, 1525 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 917 [2019]; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). While this Court has the power to convert the habeas corpus proceeding into a CPLR article 78 proceeding, we decline to do so under the circumstances of this case (see People ex rel. Stokes v New York State Div. of Parole, 144 AD3d 1550, 1551 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 915 [2017]).
Entered: October 2, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court