Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2020 NY Slip Op 05673)
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
2020 NY Slip Op 05673
Decided on October 9, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Per Curiam
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 9, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ. (Filed Oct. 9, 2020.)
&em;

[*1]MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a AND 22 NYCRR 118.1, RESPONDENTS. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEES FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER.


OPINION AND ORDER

Order of suspension entered.


Per Curiam

Opinion: In December 2019, the Grievance Committees applied to this Court for an order directing the respondents named on the attached list to show cause why they should not be suspended from the practice of law on the grounds that they violated Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 by failing to comply with attorney registration requirements, and that they failed to respond to numerous written inquiries from the Office of Court Administration and the Grievance Committees concerning their delinquency. By order entered December 27, 2019, this Court directed respondents to show cause in writing on or before March 27, 2020, why they should not be suspended for failing to comply with attorney registration requirements. This Court subsequently extended that deadline to August 1, 2020. Respondents either failed to respond in any fashion to the show cause order or otherwise failed to show cause why they should not be suspended.

The failure to comply with attorney registration requirements violates Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 and constitutes conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice warranting the imposition of discipline (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 54 AD3d 9, 10 [4th Dept 2008]). Accordingly, we conclude that the respondents named on the attached list should be suspended, effective immediately and until further order of this Court.

Name Registration IDYear

Admitted

ARCANGEL, JUSTIN EDWARD 29449991999

AUNGIER, MARSHALL C. 21146431987

BAILEY, CATHERINE ZAMARONI47572902009

BAIRD, JONATHAN PRICE 51487542013

BORN, SARAH M. 46974392009

BOSSONE, ANTHONY G.13939331978

BURKHARD, MARGARET DAYTON29775361999

BUTLER, GREGORY JON29665701999

CHADWICK, DAVID PHILLIP 30546732000

HENLINE, MARGARET MARY 24550531992

HULLEY,PATRICIA ANNE 20972691987

KAPLAN, THOMAS GERARD 24392061975

KELLY, DAVID P.41753452004

Name Registration IDYear

Admitted

LEE, JACOB L 43914542006

LEIBOWITZ, ROBERT JAY 16800161980

MACLEAN, DAVID CAMERON, JR.24980611992

MAHONEY, MARGARET MARY 23020651975

MCCARTY, ALLAN PATRICK 13938421977

MULLIN, WILLIAM PATRICK 17843701975

NAUGHTON, THOMAS CHRISTOPHER28734041998

NETZLOFF, ERIC RICHARD 48810172011

PELLA, SUSAN A.29791931999

PETTI, JOSEPH 49818332012

QUINLAN, PATRICK P.26624191995

REED, DAVID JAMES41244342003

ROLL, JAMES MICHAEL28087491997

RUSSELL, DAVID EDWARD 29745411999

SAUNDERS, DWIGHT L.17114721981

SAYASITH, RATANAKORN LUCKY48510772010

SHORR, JOSHUA DAVID29339761999

SORENSEN, STEPHEN JAMES 14980391978

VIOLA, DAMORE ASHON41912842003

WALSH, MAUREEN KITSON 19777351985

WARREN, CYNTHIA LEE41024062003

YOHANNES, NATHANIEL TESFAMICHAEL 51436232013