MEMORANDUM OPINION
NIMS, Chief Judge: This case was assigned to Special Trial Judge James M. Gussis pursuant to
OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE
GUSSIS, Special Trial Judge: This case was called for trial on November 7, 1988, from the calendar of the trial session of the Court at Salt Lake City, Utah. No appearance was made by or on behalf of petitioner. Respondent therefore moved to dismiss this case for failure of petitioner to properly prosecute. Rule 123(b).
Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax and additions to tax as follows:
Income Tax | Additions to Tax | |||
Year | Deficiency | Sec.6653(a)(1) | Sec.6653(a)(2) | Sec.6661 |
1982 | $ 15,328 | $ 766 | * | $ 1,553 |
1983 | 15,869 | 793 | ** | 1,587 |
*139 In his answer to amended petition, respondent asserted increased additions to tax in the total amounts of $ 3,832.00 and $ 3,967.25, respectively, pursuant to section 6661 for the years 1982 and 1983. 2
Petitioner was a resident of Jackson, Wyoming at the time the petition herein was filed.
The issues for decision are (1) whether petitioner had unreported gross receipts in 1982 and 1983 in the respective amounts of $ 39,510 and $ 44,429; (2) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulation; (3) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under the provisions of section 6661; and (4) whether damages may be awarded to the United States*140 under section 6673.
Respondent determined the unreported gross receipts for 1982 and 1983 by the bank deposit and cash expenditures method. Petitioner has steadfastly refused to provide any books or records to substantiate any deductions. On June 27, 1988 respondent filed a motion for entry of an order pursuant to Rule 37(c) that undenied allegations in respondent's answer be deemed admitted. The allegations addressed all of the outstanding issues. Petitioner failed to make a timely response. By order of the Court dated August 1, 1988 these allegations, (paragraphs 6(a) through 6(q) and paragraphs 7(a) through 7(t)) were deemed admitted. The allegations deemed admitted include respondent's claims in his answer to amended petition for increased additions to tax under section 6661 for 1982 and 1983.
Rule 123(b) provides that upon failure of a petitioner properly to prosecute or to comply with the Rules of this Court, the Court may dismiss a case and enter a decision against the petitioner. See also Rule 149(a). It is well settled that a petitioner's unexcused failure to appear at trial can result in a dismissal of the action or a default judgment.
We next consider whether damages should be awarded to the United States*142 under section 6673, which section provides an award for damages to the United States in an amount not in excess of $ 5,000 when it appears to the Tax Court that proceedings before it have been instituted or maintained primarily for delay or that the taxpayer's position in such cases is frivolous or groundless.
An appropriate order and decision will be entered.
Footnotes
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the years at issue, unless otherwise indicated. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
*. 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 15,328 attributable to negligence. ↩
**. 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 15,869 attributable to negligence.↩
2. As originally enacted, section 6661(a) provided for an addition to tax of 10 percent of the amount of any underpayment attributable to a substantial understatement of income tax liability. Pursuant to section 8002 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-509, 100 Stat. 1951, the rate of addition to tax was increased to 25 percent for additions assessed after October 21, 1986.
Pallottini v. Commissioner,90 T.C. 498">90 T.C. 498↩ (1988).