Lewis v. Commissioner

Ida B. Lewis v. Commissioner. George W. Lewis v. Commissioner. George W. Lewis and Ida B. Lewis v. Commissioner.

Docket Nos. 51599-51601.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1958-23; 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207; 17 T.C.M. 103; T.C.M. (RIA) 58023;

February 19, 1958

Aaron S. Resnik, Esq., for the respondent.

LEMIRE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

LEMIRE, Judge: These consolidated cases involve deficiencies and additions to the tax as follows:

	Docket			Additions to Tax
Year	No.	Petitioner	Deficiency	under Sec. 293(b)
1946	51599	Ida B. Lewis	$ 60,369.07	$31,351.19
1947	51599	Ida B. Lewis	179,875.65	89,937.83
1942	51600	George W. Lewis	7,068.61	3,534.31
1943	51600	George W. Lewis	957.89 ^*	478.95
1944	51600	George W. Lewis	20,674.26	10,337.13
1945	51600	George W. Lewis	35,615.49	17,807.74
1946	51600	George W. Lewis	62,517.12	31,258.56
1947	51600	George W. Lewis	180,309.85	90,154.93
1948	51601	George W. Lewis and Ida
		B. Lewis	179,140.54	89,570.27

1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*208

The petitioners are husband and wife and reside at San Anselmo, California.

Petitioner, George W. Lewis, filed separate returns for the years 1942 to 1945, in the District of Maryland. For the years 1946 and 1947, petitioners filed separate returns on the community property basis. For the year 1948, a joint return was filed. The various returns of petitioners for the years 1946 to 1948, inclusive, were filed with the collector or district director at San Francisco, California.

Petitioners executed a consent fixing the period of limitations to June 30, 1954, for each of the years 1945 to 1948, inclusive. The statutory notice in each docket number was issued on November 10, 1953.

There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. At the hearing the respondent conceded the absence of fraud with reference to petitioner, Ida B. Lewis, docket No. 51599, as to the years 1946 and 1947.

Absent any evidence on the part of petitioners, the deficiencies determined by the Commissioner are approved for lack of prosecution and failure of proof.

There remains for determination the question whether the deficiencies determined in docket Nos. 51600 and1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*209 51601, or any part thereof, were due to fraud with intent to evade tax under section 293(b) of the 1939 Code.

The burden is upon the respondent to establish fraud by clear and convincing evidence. Section 1112, I.R.C. of 1939.

The record shows that George W. Lewis, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, was engaged in some legitimate businesses and was considerably involved in gambling.

Petitioners maintained no proper books and records and refused to make available to the examining revenue agents any records or receipts they may have possessed. After an investigation covering a period of approximately three years, during which time the agents interviewed about 50 witnesses, the tax liability of petitioners was determined on the net worth and expenditures method.

The net income reported on the returns of petitioners and the net income as determined by the respondent is shown in the following schedule:

		Net Income
		Shown	As Determined
Year	Petitioner	on Returns	by Respondent
1942	George W. Lewis	$ 15,066.35	$ 28,269.64
1943	George W. Lewis	21,450.00	23,118.59
1944	George W. Lewis	23,667.03	53,317.72
1945	George W. Lewis	47,595.55	91,069.07
1946	George W. Lewis	17,477.87	105,411.72
1946	Ida B. Lewis	17,477.87	105,411.72
1947	George W. Lewis	9,483.25	239,640.15
1947	Ida B. Lewis	11,543.09	239,640.15
1948	George and Ida Lewis	115,153.06	348,034.86

1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*210 A summary of the net worth statement reflecting the net worth increase and understatement of income is shown in the following schedule:

SUMMARY NET WORTH STATEMENT
REFLECTING NET WORTH INCREASE AND UNDERSTATEMENT
OF INCOME OF PETITIONERS
	Years Ended
	12/31/41	12/31/42	12/31/43	12/31/44
Total Assets	$ 50,926.87	$ 79,007.66	$ 95,168.15	$ 166,740.88
Total Liabilities	750.00			23,700.00
Net Worth Increase		28,830.79	16,160.49	47,872.73
Understated Income		13,232.22	1,668.59	29,650.69

SUMMARY NET WORTH STATEMENT
REFLECTING NET WORTH INCREASE AND UNDERSTATEMENT
OF INCOME OF PETITIONERS
	Years Ended
	12/31/45	12/31/46	12/31/47	12/31/48
Total Assets	$232,757.25	$411,095.86	$868,502.26	$1,199,769.88
Total Liabilities	9,400.00
Net Worth Increase	80,316.37	187,738.61	457,406.40	331,267.62
Understated Income	43,473.52	175,867.70	458,253.97	231,614.68

The investigation by the revenue agents disclosed 4 principal sources which produced unreported income, to-wit: Personal gambling activities, bookmaking activities, manipulation of pari-mutuel funds, and income from1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*211 various legitimate enterprises, in which petitioner had an interest. The examination also disclosed that during the taxable years involved petitioner maintained two safety-deposit boxes in fictitious names.

The record shows that petitioner in each of the years 1943 to 1948, inclusive, omitted certain specific items of income, as follows:

1943	Partnership income - Alhambra
	Bowling Alley	$ 6,668.59
1944	Partnership income - Alhambra
	Bowling Alley	1,333.68
1945, 1946 and
1947	Income from the Unusual Clean-
	ers & Dyers in each year in
	the amount of	600.00
1948	Income from partnership in
	Laurel Pottery Mfg. Co.	43,198.44

On May 13, 1954, petitioner was found guilty of willfully and knowingly attempting to defeat and evade a large part of income tax for the years 1947 and 1948 in violation of section 145(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and was setenced to serve one year and to pay a fine of $24,000.

Upon the entire record, we are convinced that the respondent has shown by clear and convincing evidence that a part, if not all the deficiencies determined against petitioner, George W. Lewis, for each of the taxable years 1942 to 1948, 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*212 inclusive, was due to fraud with intent to evade tax and we so hold.

Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.

Footnotes

*. Income and Victory tax.↩

Lewis v. Commissioner

Related Cases

Footnotes