Estate of Pinkerton v. Commissioner

ESTATE OF AIRDRIE K. PINKERTON, DECEASED, ROY D. PINKERTON, ET. AL., EXECUTOR, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Estate of Pinkerton v. Commissioner
Docket No. 2066-69.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1974-71; 1974 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247; 33 T.C.M. (CCH) 342; T.C.M. (RIA) 74071;
March 26, 1974, Filed.
Jack M. Harrison and Raymond L. Heidemann, for the petitioner.
Melvern Stein, for the respondent.

TIETJENS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

TIETJENS, Judge:* The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $92,166.95 in the Federal estate tax of Airdrie K. Pinkerton (hereafter decedent). 1

*248 The issues for decision are: (1) the value of certain shares of stock owned by decedent at her death; and (2) the extent to which decedent's funeral expenses may be deducted from her gross estate.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The stipulated facts are so found and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Decedent, a resident of Ojai, California, died testate on June 26, 1966. Roy D. Pinkerton (hereafter petitioner), of Ojai, California, Airdrie Paula Martin, of Ojai, California, and Roy H. Pinkerton, of Sacramento, California, are the duly appointed, qualified and acting executors of decedent's will.

On or about May 8, 1967, petitioner filed a Federal estate tax return with the district director of internal revenue at Los Angeles, California, and elected to use the date of decedent's death as the date of valuation of the estate.

Decedent's estate was administered under the jurisdiction of California. Decedent's funeral expenses of $510.50 were paid by decedent's estate.

At the time of her death, decedent owned a one-half community property interest in the following shares of corporate stocks:

(a) 16 shares of Class A capital stock of John P. Scripps Newspapers.

(b) 16*249 shares of Class B capital stock of John P. Scripps Newspapers.

(c) 10 shares of Class A capital stock of Tulare Newspapers, Inc.

(d) 10 shares of Class B capital stock of Tulare Newspapers, Inc.

(e) 10 shares of Class A capital stock of Watsonville Newspapers, Inc.

(f) 10 shares of Class B capital stock of Watsonville Newspapers, Inc.

(g) 10 shares of Class A capital stock of Redding Record, Inc.

(h) 30 shares of Class B capital stock of Redding Record, Inc.

The Class A, no par capital stock of each of the four corporations is voting stock whereas the Class B is non-voting. In all other respects there is no distinction between the Class A and Class B stock of any of the corporations.

There have never been any sales of shares of capital stock of any of the four subject corporations from which the fair market value of such shares could be determined as of June 26, 1966.

John P. Scripps Newspapers

John P. Scripps Newspapers (hereafter Scripps), was incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1935. From March 1935 until the date of decedent's death, the issued and outstanding capital stock of Scripps was owned as follows:

Class A, no-par sharesClass B, no-par sharesTotal
Decedent and her surviving husband, Roy D. Pinkerton, as community property161632
John P. Scripps643296
Edgar F. Elfstrom and Thelma A. Elfstrom, Trustees161632
Totals9664160

*250 As of June 26, 1966, Scripps published the daily Ventura County Star-Free Press (hereafter the Star-Free Press) in Ventura, California, and the daily News-Chronicle in Thousand Oaks, California. The Star-Free Press was acquired by Scripps in 1946 although it was started as a daily newspaper by Roy D. Pinkerton on June 15, 1925. The News-Chronicle is the successor of the Conejo News, a weekly newspaper purchased by Scripps in 1961. The Star-Free Press is circulated throughout Ventura County, California, and the News-Chronicle is circulated in Southeastern Ventura County.

As of June 26, 1966, the Star-Free Press was printed on a six unit Goss letter press which was approximately 40 years old. Throughout the industry, letter presses were becoming obsolete and were being replaced by more modern offset presses. The market for used letter presses was very depressed.

As of June 26, 1966, the News-Chronicle was printed on a three unit offset press. The News-Chronicle operated from two different buildings, one of which was an old, remodeled church which had become inadequate for the newspaper's needs. It was not adaptable to remodeling, and the cost of replacing it was estimated*251 at from $150,000 to $200,000.

As of June, 1966, there were profit-sharing agreements in existence between Scripps and certain of its key employees. On December 7, 1965, the executive committee of Scripps increased the reserve account from $350,000 to $400,000 from its earned surplus to provide for its liability under the profit-sharing agreements.

The following schedules reflect certain information relevant to our determination of the value of decedent's interest in Scripps:

(1) John P. Scripps Newspapers
Net Income Before Federal Income TaxesFederal Income TaxesDividends Paid
1956$235,507$115,595$ 38,400
1957231,239114,70938,400
1958244,319121,25038,400
1959304,759151,94938,400
1960315,262157 ,25876,800
1961350,721175,64276,800
1962232,326114,07676,800
1963227,006111,29676,800
1964141,32242,09176,800
1965264,817111,70976,800
1966242,585106,73976,800
(2) Ventura County Star-Free Press
Total RevenuesNet Operating ProfitAverage Paid Daily CirculationTotal Pages PrintedTotal Advertising Inches
1956$1,071,561$237,69319,9617,220737,812
19571,131,237237,13120,3427,464749,857
19581 ,206,284249,05621,4497,418720,278
19591,374,926306,64523,1827,936796,813
19601,534,811309,11523, 9958,130837,941
19611,700,785397,69524,2308,462868,567
19621,767,893353,33225,0908,796881,181
19 631,937,494385,78726,2089,438903,827
19642,080,790378,61127,62710,236964,335
19652,338,131456,49628,89410,5341,020,221
19662,535,362317,58229,27312,1701,065,433
(3) News-Chronicle
Total RevenuesNet Operating (Loss)Average Paid Daily CirculationTotal Pages PrintedTotal Advertising Inches
7 months ended December 31,
1961$ 60,661[50,997)1,30877863,526
1962151,491(119,884)2,4541,636150,922
1963 *191,46 2(154,583)3,8292,020181,857
1964**244,632(220,232)4,6622,810198,267
1965347,020(187,636)4,3103,540230,896
1966509,111( 36,577)6,2854,409326,491
*252

(4) John P. Scripps Newspapers
(a) For the Years 1961, 1962, and 1963
196119621963
Circulation income$ 358,990$ 384,123$ 411,168
Advertising income1,392,8241,520,7081,701,932
Miscellaneous income (shopping news circulars, commercial printing, etc.)9,63114,55315,855
Interest income12,4637,8534,009
Dividend income2,7902,7902,790
Gain or (loss) on sale of capital assets(1,155)(40)89
Total Income$1,775,543$1,929,987$2,135,843
Operating expense*1,415,5021,687,5481,898,605
Interest expense9,32010,11310,232
Operating profit before Federal income taxes$ 350,721$ 232,326$ 227,006
Federal income taxes175,642114,076111,296
Net profit after Federal income taxes$ 175,079$ 118,250$ 115,710
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 40,350$ 42,431$ 42,071
(b) For the years 1964, 1965, and 1966
196419651966
Circulation income$ 445,719$ 469,661$ 550,775
Advertising income1,861,1762,125,6532,387,390
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing)18,526170,565265,965
Interest income4,4855,3234,807
Dividend income2,7902,7902,836
Gain or (loss) on sale of capital assets(276)1,384(367)
Total Income$2,332,420$2,775,376$3,211,406
Operating expense*2,167,9212,482,2072,924,238
Interest expense23,17728,35244,583
Operating profit before federal income taxes$ 141,322$ 264,817$ 242,585
Federal income taxes**42,091111,709106,739
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 99,231$ 153,108$ 135,846
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 53,387$ 70,717$ 78,686
**After reduction for investment credits in the amounts of$ 20,385$ 7,641$ 2,105
*253
(5) John P. Scripps Newspapers
(a) As of December 31, 1961 and 1962
Assets12/31/6112/31/62
Cash on hand and in banks$ 208,618$ 105,591
Securities at cost85,824160,824
Notes and accounts receivable - net315,973208,368
Inventories and supplies45,69941,236
Land, buildings and equipment - net507,293657,502
Goodwill - purchased49,82749,827
Deferred charge8,1057,969
Organization expense599599
Miscellaneous assets12,308975
Total Assets$1,234,246$1,232,891
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 182,267$ 140,409
Notes payable-non-current163,145166,510
Prepaid subscriptions5,3795,647
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities10,7066,127
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements350,000350,000
Capital stock (160 shares)1,6001,600
Capital surplus98,63198,631
Earned surplus422,518463,967
Total Liabilities and Capital$1,234,246$1,232,891
(b) As of December 31, 1963 and 1964
Assets12/31/6312/31/64
Cash on hand and in banks$ 114,252$ 97,958
Securities at cost173,162194,061
Notes and accounts receivable - net217,189262,751
Inventories and supplies42,60951,710
Land, buildings and equipment - net638,946957,925
Goodwill - purchased49,82749,827
Deferred charge8,66310,040
Organization expense599599
Miscellaneous assets56,72890
Total Assets$1,301,975$1,624,961
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 168,269$ 114,640
Notes payable-non-current169,415523,970
Prepaid subscriptions7,3167,791
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities3,8673,020
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements350,000350,000
Capital stock (160 shares)1,6001,600
Capital surplus98,63198,631
Earned surplus502,877525,309
Total Liabilities and Capital$1,301,975$1,624,961
(c) As of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966
Assets12/31/656/30/66
Cash on hand and in banks$ 175,057$ 117,625
Securities at cost194,061194,061
Notes and accounts receivable - net323,904325,298
Inventories and supplies44,75960,262
Land, buildings and equipment - net1,091,8311,064,634
Goodwill - purchased274,827274,827
Deferred charge62,89766,519
Organization expense599599
Miscellaneous assets3164,967
Total Assets$2,168,251$2,108,792
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 232,358$ 212,709
Notes payable-non-current871,606774,107
Prepaid subscriptions9,53411,170
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities2,9052,557
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements400,000400,000
Capital stock (160 shares)1,6001,600
Capital surplus98,63198,631
Earned surplus551,617608,018
Total Liabilities and Capital$2,168,251$2,108,792
*254
(6) Securities owned by John P. Scripps Newspapers as of December 31, 1965, and June 30, 1966
DescriptionCost
$ 50,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 4% of 8/15/70$ 50,000
40,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 2 1/2% of 6/15/6937,337
20,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 3 7/8% of 5/15/6820,000
10,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 2 1/2% of 12/15/6910,000
558 shares of 5% Series "A" cumulative preferred stock of E.W. Scripps Company55,824
100 shares of common capital stock (20% interest) by Entsunews, Inc., publisher of Simi-Enterprise-Sun & News, Simi, California20,900
Total$194,061

Tulare Newspapers, Inc.

Tulare Newspapers, Inc. (hereafter Tulare) was incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1945. From the date of incorporation until the date of decedent's death, the issued and outstanding capital stock of the corporation was owned as follows:

Class A, no-par sharesClass B, no-par sharesTotal
Decedent and her surviving husband, Roy D. Pinkerton, as community property101020
John P. Scripps8080160
Harry Green101020
Totals100100200

As of June 26, 1966, Tulare's principal business activity consisted*255 of the publication of a daily newspaper, the Tulare Advance Register and Tulare Times (hereafter the Register-Times) in Tulare, California. The Register-Times was started as a daily newspaper by Tulare in December 1945. The Register-Times is circulated in Tulare County.

As of June 26, 1966, the plant and equipment used in the production of the Register-Times was old and outdated. The Register-Times was printed on a Goss letter press, and, in 1966, the estimated cost of converting to an offset press operation was $300,000.

Tulare did not pay any dividends during the years 1956 through 1970.

The following schedules reflect certain information relevant to our consideration of the value of decedent's interest in Tulare:

(1) Tulare Newspapers, Inc.

Net Income Before Federal Income TaxesFederal Income Taxes
1956$16,480$ 4,944
195711,2733,382
195823,5097,053
195921,1365,741
196034,87712,636
196110,2443,073
196212,8323,850
19631,498444
196438,39311,102
196534,55011,506
196626,0877,335

(2) Tulare Advance Register and Tulare Times

(2) Tulare Advance Register and Tulare Times

Total RevenuesNet Operating ProfitAverage Paid Daily CirculationTotal Pages PrintedTotal Advertising Inches
1956$286,144$ 24,6614,7713,454283,154
1957280,70819,0824,8473,432268,919
1958311, 53331,0344,8193,426274,907
1959318,87116,6735,0473,508271,769
1960377,47742,4205,0183,740290 ,573
1961362,65217,9805,2003,728277,760
1962385,62920,2395,2393,896289,867
1963390,2944,9725,2 594,028273,175
1964416,02042,1535,2013,836281,859
1965433,06739,7255,3533,826284,406
1966461,51530,8325,5994,126296,728
*256
(3) Tulare Newspapers, Inc.
(a) For the years 1961, 1962, and 1963
196119621963
Circulation income$ 63,189$ 63,417$ 67,449
Advertising income289,328307,141308,464
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing, etc.)10,13515,07114,381
Gain on sale of capital assets-0--0-2,000
Total Income$362,652$385,629$392,294
Operating expense *344,672365,391385,322
Interest expense7,7367,4065,474
Operating income before federal income taxes$ 10,244$ 12,832$ 1,498
Federal income taxes3,0733,850444
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 7,171$ 8,982$ 1,054
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 5,351$ 5,350$ 5,297
(b) For the Years 1964, 1965, and 1966
196419651966
Circulation income$ 74,309$ 76,647$ 79,477
Advertising income322,975330,488347,372
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing, etc.)18,73625,93234,666
Interest income-0--0-60
Gain on sale of capital assets1,333-0--0-
Total Income$417,353$433,067$461,575
Operating expense *373,867393,342430,682
Interest expense5,0935,1754,806
Operating income before federal income taxes$ 38,393$ 34,550$ 26,087
Federal income taxes**11,10211,5067,335
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 27,291$ 23,044$ 18,752
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 6,167$ 7,041$ 7,260
**After reduction for investment credits in the amounts of$ 2,276$ 78$ 187
*257
(4) Tulare Newspapers, Inc.
(a) As of December 31, 1961 and 1962
Assets12/31/6112/31/62
Cash on hand and in banks$ 53,822$ 39,586
Notes and accounts receivable - net37,69441,444
Inventories and supplies10,1116,386
Land, buildings and equipment - net68,96464,993
Goodwill - purchased84,63084,630
Deferred charges1,7301,829
Total Assets$256,951$238,868
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 18,673$ 15,026
Notes payable-non-current129,441106,035
Prepaid subscriptions2,8272,858
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities492448
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus103,518112,501
Total Liabilities and Capital$256,951$238,868
(b) As of December 31, 1963 and 1964
Assets12/31/6312/31/64
Cash on hand and in banks$ 22,523$ 33,637
Notes and accounts receivable - net36,81743,190
Inventories and supplies6,5444,345
Land, buildings and equipment - net61,84788,030
Goodwill - purchased84,63084,630
Deferred charges1,8542,144
Total Assets$214,215$255,976
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 10,301$ 23,259
Notes payable-non-current84,88586,249
Prepaid subscriptions3,0843,062
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities390560
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus113,555140,846
Total Liabilities and Capital$214,215$255,976
(c) As of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966
Assets12/31/656/30/66
Cash on hand and in banks$ 53,022$ 66,082
Notes and accounts receivable - net49,69741,605
Inventories and supplies6,1774,927
Land, buildings and equipment - net82,09881,740
Goodwill - purchased84,63084,630
Deferred charges2,8222,334
Total Assets$278,446$281,318
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 29,193$ 17,067
Notes payable-non-current79,74480,096
Prepaid subscriptions3,0093,516
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities610590
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus163,890178,049
Total Liabilities and Cpaital$278,446$281,318

*258 Watsonville Newspapers, Inc.

Watsonville Newspapers, Inc. (hereafter Watsonville) was incorporated under the laws of the State of California in December 1945. From the date of incorporation until the date of decedent's death, the issued and outstanding capital stock of Watsonville was owned as follows:

Class A, no-par sharesClass B, no-par sharesTotal
Decedent and her surviving husband, Roy D. Pinkerton, as community property101020
John P. Scripps6060120
Harry Green101020
Edgar F. Elfstrom and Thelma A. Elfstrom, Trustees202040
Totals100100200

As of June 26, 1966, Wastsonville's principal business activity consisted of the publication of a daily newspaper, the Watsonville Register-Pajaronian (hereafter the Register-Pajaronian) in Watsonville, California. Watsonville acquired the Register-Pajaronian on December 31, 1945. The Register-Pajaronian is circulated in Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties.

As of June 26, 1966, old equipment and an inadequate leased building were used in the production of the Register-Pajaronian. The Register-Pajaronian had been printed on letter press but was converted to offset press*259 in 1969 at an approximate cost of $700,000, which included the cost of the property necessary to the conversion.

As of June 26, 1966, there were profit-sharing agreements in existence between Watsonville and certain of its key employees. On December 3, 1965, the executive committee of Watsonville increased the reserve account in the amount of $50,000 from its earned surplus to provide for its liability under the profit-sharing agreements.

The following schedules reflect certain information relevant to our consideration of the value of decedent's interest in Watsonville:

(1) Watsonville Newspapers, Inc.

Net Income Before Federal Income TaxesFederal Income TaxesDividends Paid
1956$ 56,942$24,110$ 18,000
195758,63724,99118,000
195855,59023,20518,000
195958,10424,10618,000
196076,28433,56 024,000
196150,70220,25724,000
196268,51729,52124,000
196376,43433,52424,000
1964115,71048,78424,000
1965117,72348,89835,000
1966110,92546,07036,000

(2) Watsonville Register-Pajaronian

Total RevenuesNet Operating ProfitAverage Paid Daily CirculationTotal Pages PrintedTotal Avertising Inches
1956$378,691$ 60,2457,4493,908364,855
1957379,96862,1517,6323,796342,723
1958380,87957, 8897,7493,772340,929
1959393,62357,8327,9053,742328,262
1960456,83874,9198,1334,040347,843
196 1444,46448,2128,2874,042338,385
1962516,01167,8358,3894,386367,346
1963579,53975,0638,4714,7 94394,275
1964694,936113,9548,6545,370456,473
1965730,650114,1758,9105,468458,056
1966760,692104,8369,2785,586467,850
*260
(3) Matsonville Newspapers, Inc.
(a) For the years 1961, 1962 and 1963
196119621963
Circulation income$106,320$106,265$108,441
Advertising income333,372398,007447,308
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing, etc.)4,77211,73923,791
Interest income6,5886,9736,718
Dividend income1,3751,3751,375
Gain on sale of capital assets-0-(1,171)422
Total Income$452,427$523,188$588,055
Operating expense*396,252448,176504,476
Interest expense5,4736,4957,145
Operating income before federal income taxes$ 50,702$ 68,517$ 76,434
Federal income taxes20,25729,52133,524
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 30,445$ 38,996$ 42,910
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 8,488$ 8,420$ 7,175
(b) For the years 1964, 1965, and 1966
196419651966
Circulation income$128,707$131,452$135,685
Advertising income531,016566,755599,164
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial, printing, etc.)35,21332,44325,844
Interest income6,8488,15812,112
Dividend income1,3751,3751,375
Gain on sale of capital assets-0-3-0-
Total Income$703,159$740,186$774,180
Operating expense*580,982616,474655,856
Interest expense6,4675,9897,399
Operating income before federal income taxes$115,710$117,723$110,925
Federal income taxes**48,78448,89846,070
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 66,926$ 68,825$ 64,855
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 7,609$ 8,399$ 8,651
**After reduction for investment credits in the amounts of$ 1,487$ 548$ 113
*261
(4) Watsonville Newspapers, Inc.
(a) As of December 31, 1964 and 1962
Assets12/31/6112/31/62
Cash on hand and in banks$ 40,203$ 63,048
Securities at cost97,62997,629
Notes and accounts receivable - net119,276129,970
Inventories and supplies9,1068,690
Land, buildings and equipment - net58,37453,255
Goodwill - purchased104,293104,293
Deferred charges1,2352,676
Total Assets$430,116$459,561
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 34,633$ 49,953
Notes payable-non-current92,00993,084
Prepaid subscriptions7,6466,776
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities3,5882,512
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements125,000125,000
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus165,240180,236
Total Liabilities and Capital$430,116$459,561
(b) As of December 31, 1963 and 1964
Assets12/31/6312/31/64
Cash on hand and in banks$ 81,580$119,732
Securities at cost115,054115,054
Notes and accounts receivable - net105,111120,975
Inventories and supplies6,09610,868
Land, buildings and equipment - net56,17269,800
Goodwill - purchased104,293104,293
Deferred charges2,5142,069
Miscellaneous assets1,5001,000
Total Assets$472,320$543,791
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 48,969$ 71,169
Notes payable-non-current88,08994,350
Prepaid subscriptions7,3797,583
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities1,7371,617
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements118,500112,000
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus205,646255,072
Total Liabilities and Capital$472,320$543,791
(c) As of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966
Assets12/31/656/30/66
Cash on hand and in banks$ 60,763$ 35,194
Securities at cost115,054115,054
Notes and accounts receivable - net218,510211,740
Inventories and supplies9,80811,577
Land, buildings and equipment - net69,226126,818
Goodwill - purchased104,293104,293
Deferred charges4,55512,416
Miscellaneous assets1,0001,000
Total Assets$583,209$618,092
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 70,089$ 45,850
Notes payable-non-current100,594135,095
Prepaid subscriptions8,1038,914
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities1,5261,994
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements155,500149,000
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus245,397275,239
Total Liabilities and Capital$583,209$618,092

*262 (5) Securities owned by Watsonville

As of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966

DescriptionCost
$50,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 2 1/2% of 6/15/69$ 47,412
30,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 4% of 8/15/7030,000
10,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 3 7/8% of 5/15/6810,125
275 shares of 5% Series "A" cumulative preferred stock of E.W. Scripps Company27,517
Total$115,054

Redding Record, Inc.

Redding Record, Inc. (hereafter Redding) was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on October 17, 1938. From the date of incorporation until the date of decedent's death, the issued and outstanding capital stock of Redding was owned as follows:

Class A, no-par sharesClass B, no-par sharesTotal
Decedent and her surviving husband, Roy D. Pinkerton, as community property103040
John P. Scripps8040120
Paul C. Bodenhamer51520
Harry O. Bostwick, Jr.51520
Totals100100200

As of June 26, 1966, Redding's principal business activity consisted of the publication of a daily newspaper, the Redding Record-Searchlight and The Courier-Free Press (hereafter the Record-Searchlight), in Redding, California. Redding*263 started the Record-Serachlight on October 17, 1938. The Record-Searchlight is circulated in Shasta County.

As of June 26, 1966, the Record-Searchlight was printed on a forty year old five unit letter press and production was carried on in two separate locations, one of which was owned by Redding and the other leased. The estimated cost of consolidating operations and converting to an offset press was $950,000.

As of June 26, 1966, there were profit-sharing agreements in existence between Redding and certain of its key employees. On December 3, 1965, the executive committee of Redding increased the reserve account from $125,000 to $200,000 from its earned surplus to provide for its liability under the profit-sharing agreements.

The following schedules reflect certain information relevant to our consideration of the value of decedent's interest in Redding:

(1) Redding Record, Inc.

Net Income Before Federal Income TaxesFederal Income TaxesDividends Paid
1956$ 95,545$ 44,183$ 18,000
195794,93943,86218,000
195898,57145,70718,000
1959122,94158,42918,000
1960136,39165,42418,000
1961146,0 0270,42138,000
1962148,29271,55148,000
1963154,89074,41648,000
1964230,570106,12460,000
1965275,167124,86772,000
1966267,672117,12672,000

*264 (2) Redding Record-Searchlight & The Courier-Free Press

Total RevenuesNet Operating ProfitAverage Paid Daily CirculationTotal Pages PrintedTotal Advertising Inches
1956$ 593,964$ 95,51212,5075,118473,380
1957642,61394,98713,1315,272481,716
1958688,7 4799,13813,8665,220459,071
1959779,797126,52714,7955,372494,788
1960885,663138,32515,4235,656 529,477
1961936,798147,44816,1595,676510,540
19621,004,486149,67716,8615,938537,182
19631,093,888 153,90818,0576,260553,938
19641,279,578232,38519,2387,008630,766
19651,425,348272,46620,1507,394665,616
19661,513,649259,73921,1607,796687,239
(3) Redding Record, Inc.
(a) For the Years 1961, 1962, and 1963
196119621963
Circulation income$207,685$ 214,833$ 223,983
Advertising income711,331772,807855,229
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing, etc.)17,78216,84614,676
Interest income8378991,392
Gain on sale of capital assets-0-2272,322
Total Income$937,635$1,005,612$1,097,602
Operating expense*789,350854,809939,980
Interest expense2,2832,5112,732
Operating income before federal income taxes$146,002$ 148,292$ 154,890
Federal income taxes70,42171,55174,416
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 75,581$ 76,741$ 80,474
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 19,086$ 20,220$ 22,993
(b) For the Years 1964, 1965, and 1966
196419651966
Circulation income$ 254,750$ 284,159$ 299,927
Advertising income1,009,2431,111,5721,178,428
Miscellaneous income (shopping news, circulars, commercial printing, etc.)15,58529,61735,294
Interest income1,1386,10011,754
Total Income$1,280,716$1,431,448$1,525,403
Operating expense*1,047,1931,152,8821,253,909
Interest expense2,9533,3993,822
Operating income before federal income taxes$ 230,570$ 275,167$ 267,672
Federal income taxes**106,124124,867117,126
Net profit after federal income taxes$ 124,446$ 150,300$ 150,546
*Includes depreciation expense in the amounts of$ 23,354$ 23,993$ 26,631
**After reduction for investment credits in the amounts of$ 2,161$ 713$ 4,856
*265
(4) Redding Record, Inc.
(a) As of December 31, 1961 and 1962
Assets12/31/6112/31/62
Cash on hand and in banks$ 77,548$101,248
Securities at cost29,57829,578
Notes and accounts receivable - net76,39484,990
Inventories and supplies40,56936,226
Land, buildings and equipment - net281,910291,614
Goodwill - purchased13,21913,219
Deferred charges3,6714,217
Miscellaneous assets11,1555,115
Total Assets$534,044$566,207
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 85,875$ 85,010
Notes payable-non-current41,85445,540
Prepaid subscriptions4,4044,581
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities6,6587,081
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements125,000125,000
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus268,253296,995
Total Liabilities and Capital$534,044$566,207
(b) As of December 31, 1963 and 1964
Assets12/31/6312/31/64
Cash on hand and in banks$ 96,379$172,238
Securities at cost38,00338,003
Notes and accounts receivable - net96,173112,560
Inventories and supplies29,69316,855
Land, buildings and equipment - net331,586339,476
Goodwill - purchased13,21913,219
Deferred charges5,3155,568
Miscellaneous assets3,2523,252
Total Assets$613,620$701,171
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$ 95,251$109,219
Notes payable-non-current49,21556,650
Prepaid subscriptions4,7315,723
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities7,9548,665
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements125,000125,000
Capital stock (200 shares)2,0002,000
Earned surplus329,469393,914
Total Liabilities and Capital$613,620$701,171
(c) As of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966
Assets12/31/656/30/66
Cash on hand and in banks$110,945$ 60,300
Securities at cost38,00338,003
Notes and accounts receivable - net276,950293,172
Inventories and supplies21,59021,272
Land, buildings and equipment - net325,602328,808
New press - installation in process-0-63,691
Goodwill - purchased13,21913,219
Deferred charges9,25715,554
Miscellaneous assets19,761100
Total Assets$815,327$834,119
Liabilities and Capital
Current liabilities$137,479$ 95,813
Notes payable-non-current63,70063,700
Prepaid subscriptions5,8366,626
Miscellaneous non-current liabilities9,0989,030
Reserve for liability under employee profit sharing agreements200,000200,000
Capital stock (200 shares2,0002,000
Earned surplus397,214456,950
Total Liabilities and Capital$815,327$834,119

*266 (5) Securities owned by Redding Record, Inc. as of December 31, 1965 and June 30, 1966

DescriptionCost
$10,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 3 1/8% of 5/15/68$ 10,000
30,000 U.S. Treasury bonds - 2 1/2% of 6/15/6928,003
Total$ 38,003

ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT

As of June 26, 1966, the values per share of the stock owned by decedent and her husband were as follows:

Scripps$5,400
Tulare400
Watsonville2,200
Redding4,500

OPINION

VALUATION

We must first determine the value as of June 26, 1966, of shares of stock owned by decedent and her husband as community property at decedent's death. Petitioner reported certain values on the decedent's estate tax return, and the Commissioner determined a deficiency of $92,166.95 based on higher values. The Commissioner lowered that deficiency to $52,215.67, based on values computed by his expert witness. In an amended petition, petitioner modified his position in accordance with the values computed by his expert witness. The following chart summarizes these various values:

ReturnAmended PetitionOriginal DeficiencyModified Deficiency
Scripps (per share)$4,800$4,394$13,779$9,500
Tulare (per share)7501691,245900
Watsonville (per share)1,7501,7144,3373,500
Redding (per share)3,6003,51910,8228,000

*267 Petitioner and the Commissioner presented the reports and testimony of two expert witnesses, both of whom were highly qualified to give expert opinions.Each expert used sophisticated analyses to determine the value of the shares under consideration.

Petitioner's expert reviewed the financial data and the publishing facilities of each corporation and the market climate at the time of decedent's death. He examined valuation criteria and formulae proposed by various students of the newspaper industry. Of these formulae, he chose four which he believed representative and developed "Values of Total Enterprise by Principal Formulas" as follows:

Krehbiel*10 times 5-year mean net income6-2/3 times excess of 5-year mean net income over 8% of net tangible assets, plus net tangible assets13.1 times 1965 net income
Scripps$1,772,279$1,532,270$1,197,865$2,005,714
Per Share11,0769,5777,48612,535
Tulare321,702135,080121,390301,876
Per Share1,6086756071,509
Watsonville581,235496,180397,699901,608
Per Share2,9062,4801,9884,508
Redding1,149,0791,015,080857,0841,968,930
Per Share5,7455,0754,2859,845
*268

Having indicated the values resulting from the application of these formulae, petitioner's expert examined data taken from the 1966 Moody's Manual concerning the Boston Herald-Traveler, Inc., the Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc., Dow Jones & Co., New York Times Co., and Times-Mirror Co. He concluded:

The one company whose business is confined to that of newspaper publishing only, and in one locality, is the Cincinnati Enquirer, and in our opinion offers the best single comparable with the companies under valuation. Applying the same ratios to the companies under valuation gives the following results:

Company5-year P/E(14)1965 P/E (12-1/2)110% of grossDiv. Yield (5.5%)Mean
Scripps$13,407$11,962$18,456$8,727$ 13,138
Tulare9461,4412,38201,192
Watsonville3,4734,3024,0713,1823,757
Redding7,1059,3947,8306,5457,718

*269 Having computed values which would have been appropriate if the companies had been transferred as complete enterprises and if the stock in the companies had been traded actively, petitioner's expert argued that the value of decedent's minority interests in closely held corporations was subject to a discount for lack of marketability. Using purchases by two investment companies in 1967 and 1968 of restricted shares of stock in corporations which also issued comparable publicly traded stock, he concluded that an appropriate discount "would certainly exceed 50 percent, and in our opinion would rise to 75 percent."

Petitioner's expert concludes with the following "Valuation Summary":

A purchaser of the shares of the Companies under valuation would acquire a highly unmarketable interest in Companies in which he had practically no influence upon management, and in which his expectancy could only be the dividend return, the value of which would be capitalizable at an appropriate discounted rate. In the case of two of the Companies (Watsonville Newspapers, Inc. and Redding Record, Inc.) the expectancy of increased dividends was high.In the case of one (Tulare Newspapers, Inc.) no dividend*270 had been paid during the preceding decade; revenues and net income were gradually increasing, but the necessity of eventually modernizing the presses would tend to postpone that expectation. In the case of John P. Scripps Newspapers the dividend was doubled in 1960, but had remained unchanged since, and the fluctuations in net income in the 5-year period, 1961-1965 (between $115,710 and $175,642), with the highest net in the earliest year, did not offer a basis for anticipating an early increase in the dividend.

In the light of all the foregoing considerations it is our opinion that the shares of the instant Companies, on valuation date, if available and publicly marketable, would be appraised at the market at the mean of 10 times the five-year mean net profit and a capitalization of the dividend. In the case of the John P. Scripps Newspapers, the dividends, which have been secure and steady, would be capitalizable at 6 per cent, corresponding to the interest obtainable from time deposits in savings institutions. In the case of the Watsonville Newspapers, Inc. and Redding Record, Inc., an appropriate capitalization rate would be 4 per cent. In the case of Tulare Newspapers, Inc.*271 , which paid no dividends, the dividend capitalization rate would be zero. The results may be summarized as follows:

5-year P/E (19)Dividend capitalizedMean
Scripps$9,576$8,000 (6%)$8,788
Tulare6750338
Watsonville2,4814,375 (4%)3,428
Redding5,0759,000 (4%)7,037

These values, in our opinion, would be subject to a discount for nonmarketability of at least 50 percent, or more, and at 50 percent discount the indicated fair market values are as follows:

Scripps$4,394
Tulare169
Watsonville1,714
Redding3,519

The Commissioner's expert analysed the newspapers and balance sheets of each company. Using that analysis, he compared the stock owned by decedent to the stock of seven companies "primarily engaged in the newspaper industry": Boston Hearld-Traveler, Cincinnati Enquirer, Federated Publications, Globe-News Publishing Company, Maclean-Hunter Publications (Canadian), Stauffer Publications, and Toronto Star Limited (Canadian). Having determined relevant averages for those seven companies, he chose four of them as more nearly comparable to the companies the stock of which he was evaluating: Cincinnati*272 Enquirer, Federated Publications, Maclean-Hunter Publications, and Stauffer Publications. Having determined average relevant ratios of those four companies, the Commissioner's expert examined the relevant ratios of the Cincinnati Enquirer, which he considered most similar to the companies the stock of which he was evaluating.

We have compiled the following chart summarizing the values determined by the Commissioner's expert:

ScrippsTulareWatsonvilleRedding
Price-Net Tamgible Asset Ratio Of 7 na (335%)$ 9,075$1,431 d
Of 4 b$ 3,367-$ 8,677-
6,086 h12,605 j
Cincinnati Enquirer (448.70%12,1552,1403,3036,897-
4,580 i10,002 k
Price-Earnings Ratio Latest Year Of 7 na (16.48%)1,237-
1,596 e
Of 4 b (14.45%)10,545-1,237-
20,168 c1,857 fhj
Cincinnati Enquirer (12.73%)10,8081,197ik
5 Year Average
Of 7 a (22.04%)e
Of 4 b (21.58%)cfhj
Cincinnati Enquirer (16.24%)12,6351,283ik
Dividend Yield Latest Year Of 7 a (2.73%)e
Of 4 b (3.04%)cfhj
Cincinnati Enquirer (5.22%)9,195720 gik
5 Year Average Of 7 a (2.11%)e
Of 4 b (2.38%)cfhj
Cincinnati Enquirer (4.33%)11,085730 gik
Value determined by Commissioner's expert9,5009003,5008,000
*273

*274 The reports and testimony of the two expert witnesses have aided us in our consideration of the evidence. Both reports were carefully prepared and suggested analyses which we have used in our independent determination of the value of the stock owned by decedent and her husband. Both experts have given us insights into the financial history and future of each of the companies. The use by the Commissioner's expert of comparative companies to develop ratios and formulae was helpful, but we have considered the sizes and capital structures of those "comparatives" in our own determination. Similarly, we have considered the review by petitioner's expert of literature containing formulae for the valuation of newspapers. We have also studied his lists of stocks purchased at discounts in our consideration of appropriate discounts.

Cases of this kind would be better disposed of by the honest bargaining of the experts rather than by lengthy trials and conflicting testimony of those experts. Nevertheless, the parties in this case have come to us and have attempted to give us the knowledge of their experts. That the question of value is one of fact, to be decided after a consideration*275 of all the pertinent evidence and an application thereto of the judgment and experience of the trier of the facts, needs the citation of no authority. We have carefully considered all the evidence which the parties have offered and have attempted to follow in our own poor way the "ancient precedent established by a man whose name has become synonymous with wisdom." Webster Investors, Inc. v. Commissioner, 291 F.2d 192">291 F.2d 192, 194 (C.A. 2, 1961), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court. We state our application of that precedent to the pertinent facts without dissecting the individual factors underlying our findings, and we hold that the values per share of decedent's stock on June 26, 1966, were as follows:

Scripps$5,400
Tulare400
Watsonville2,200
Redding4,500

Funeral Expenses

The second issue presented involves the deductibility of decedent's funeral expenses. The Commissioner determined that, under California law, the entire community property, including the interest therein of decedent's husband, was chargeable with decedent's funeral expenses and that, under section 2053(a), that portion of the funeral expenses chargeable to the husband's*276 one-half interest in the community property could not be deducted from decedent's gross estate. The Commissioner relies on Pfeiffer v. United States, 310 F. Supp 392 (E.D. Cal. 1969), Estate of Mary V. Rowan, 54 T.C. 633">54 T.C. 633, 641 (1970), Estate of Hugh C. Hutson 49 T.C. 495">49 T.C. 495 (1968), and Rev. Rul. 70-156, 1 C.B. 190">1970-1 C.B. 190. See also Estate of Henry James Davis, 51 T.C. 361">51 T.C. 361, 369 (1968). 2

Petitioner argues that the amounts paid for funeral expenses may be fully deducted from decedent's gross estate. He contends that a husband's funeral expenses are chargeable to community property only because that property is included in his gross estate and that, when a wife predeceases her husband, only her half of the community property is subject to the debts of her estate, including her funeral expenses. Petitioner relies on section 202 of the California Probate Code, In Re Cornitius' Estate, 154 Cal. app. 2d 422, 316 P.2d 438">316 P.2d 438 (1957),*277 In Re Dennis' Estate, 110 Cal. app. 2d 667, 243 P.2d 579">243 P.2d 579 (1952), and In Re Kurt's Estate, 83 Cal. app. 2d 681, 189 P.2d 528">189 P.2d 528 (1948).

Petitioner asks us to reconsider our holding in Estate of Mary V. Rowan, supra, that a wife's funeral expenses were not fully deductible. He argues that, in that case, we considered section 951.1 of the California Probate Code and did not consider the relevance of California Probate Code section 202, which, petitioner contends, establishes a distinction between the funeral expenses of a husband and those of a wife.

We believe that our holding in Estate of Mary V. Rowan was correct. We need not analyze the complexities of the California statutes to determine whether the same sections establish the chargeability against the interests of both the husband and wife, for we find ample authority for the proposition that, in California, a husband's interest in community property must bear a portion of a wife's funeral expenses. In Odone v. Marzocchi, 34 Cal. 2d 431">34 Cal. 2d 431, 211 P.2d 297">211 P.2d 297, 301-2 (1949), rehearing denied 212 P.2d 233">212 P.2d 233 (1949), the Supreme Court of California held*278 that funeral expenses of a wife were chargeable against community property:

Section 202 of the Probate Code provides in part that "Community property passing from the control of the husband, either by reason of his death or by virtue of testamentary disposition by the wife, is subject to his debts and to administration and disposal under the provisions of Division III of this code; * * *." The husband is liable for the necessaries of life furnished to the wife while the parties are living together. Civ. Code, sec. 174. [Now Civil Code 5130, added by Stats. 1969, c. 1608, p. 3343, sec. 8, operative January 1, 1970.] Medical expenses incurred during the last illness, and the funeral expenses, are such necessaries. * * * In Re Estate of Coffee, 19 Cal. 2d 248">19 Cal. 2d 248, 252, 120 P.2d 661">120 P.2d 661, 664, this Court, in construing section 202, Probate Code, said that "* * * the portion of the community property which belongs to the wife is the one-half which remains after the payment of the husband's debts and the expenses of administration * * *." * * * In the Coffee case, the husband predeceased the wife so the reverse situation is presented. This would, however, seem to make no difference*279 in the result to be reached.

This liability for a wife's funeral expenses does not seem to have been affected by either In Re Dennis' Estate, supra or the passage of section 951.1 of the California Probate Code. See Knego v. Grover, 208 Cal. App. 2d 134">208 Cal. App. 2d 134, 25 Cal Reporter 158, 165 (1962) and "Deductibility of Funeral Expenses - Time for a Change in California," August 1969 L.A.B. Bull. 426.

Since California courts have held that community property is chargeable for the funeral expenses of a wife as well as a husband, we follow Pfeiffer v. United States, supra, and Estate of Hugh C. Hutson, supra, and hold that a portion of decedent's funeral expenses is not deductible from decedent's gross estate. In short, on this issue, we agree with the Commissioner's determination.

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.


Footnotes

  • *. Pursuant to a notice of reassignment sent to counsel for all parties, and to which no objections were filed, this case was reassigned by the Chief Judge on July 5, 1973 from Judge Austin Hoyt to Judge Norman O. Tietjens for disposition.

  • 1. In June 1970, the Commissioner secured an appraisal which suggested values lower than those originally determined for the shares of stock the values of which are in dispute. Accordingly, the Commissioner has made certain concessions and now asserts a deficiency of $52,215.67.

  • *. Converted from twice weekly to three times weekly, April 1, 1963.

    ** Converted from three times weekly to daily and Sunday, June 1,1964.

  • *. Mean of (a) gross income x 117% (use 120%); (b) population x $19.34 (use $20); (c) paid circulation x $39.30 (use $40); (d) after tax earnings x 12. The Krehbiel formula values dailies at the price computed after certain adjustments to that mean for strengths and weaknesses of the town, field, plant, economy, and general operation of the paper.

  • d. Apparently, the Commissioner's expert used an asset ratio of 300% rather than 355%.

  • b. The four companies are Cincinnati Enquirer, Federated Publications, Maclean-Hunter Publications, and Stauffer Publications.

  • h. The Commissioner's expert states that, based on average yields, asset ratio, and P/E ratios of the four comparatives, "indicated value of Watsonville stock ranges from $3,367 per share to $6,086 per share. The low side of the range is attributed to the price net tangible asset ratio and the high side is attributable to five year average earnings and dividends."

  • j. The Commissioner's expert gives only a range, $8,677 to $12,605, of Redding values derived from the four comparables.

  • i. The Commissioner's expert gives only a range, $3,303 to $4,580, of Watsonville values derived from Cincinnati.

  • k. The Commissioner's expert gives only a range, $8,677 to $12,605, of Redding values derived from Cincinnati.

  • e. The Commissioner's expert gives only a range, $1,237 to $1,596, of values of Tulare stock derived from average P/E ratios and yields of the seven comparatives.

  • c. In his report, having set forth the P/E ratios and yields, the Commissioner's expert states, "The average ratios of the four comparatives produce indicated values for Scripps ranging from $10,545 per share to $20,168 per share." We assume that those figures represent utilization of the yields as well as the P/E ratios.

  • f. The Commissioner's expert gives only a range, $1,237 to $1,857, of values of Tulare stock derived from P/E ratios and yields of the four comparatives.

  • a. The seven companies are Boston Herald-Traveler, Cincinnati Enquirer, Federated Publications, Globe-News Publishing Company, Maclean-Hunter Publications, Stauffer Publications, and Toranto Star Limited.

  • g. In his computations of the value of Tulare stock, the Commissioner's expert "assumed a dividend potential equivalent to a 40 percent pay out of earnings, this amounts to a dividend of $37.60 per share for 1966 and a five year average dividend of $31.60 per share."

  • 2. The Comissioner notes that amounts paid after June 17, 1970, the effective date of an amendment to California Probate Code section 951.1 are fully deductible. See Rev. Rul. 71-168, 1 C.B. 271">1971-1 C.B. 271.