COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
DAVID E. WOOD, § No. 08-20-00109-CR
Appellant, § Appeal from the
v. § 358th District Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Ector County, Texas1
Appellee. § (TC# D-17-1994-CR)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
David Wood has filed an appeal from an order revoking his community supervision and
adjudicating him guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. We affirm.
FRIVOLOUS APPEAL
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is
supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and
applicable law and concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel has provided
Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, a copy of the clerk’s record
and the reporter’s record, and an explanatory letter. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to
review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his
1
We hear this case on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3
1
right to file a petition for discretionary review in order to seek review by the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 68. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313
(Tex.Crim.App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008); and Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (en banc).
After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error that
might arguably support the appeal, and accordingly, we conclude that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit. As such, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw.
JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice
December 17, 2020
Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
2