People v Ortiz |
2021 NY Slip Op 00125 |
Decided on January 12, 2021 |
Appellate Division, First Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: January 12, 2021
Before: Acosta, P.J., Webber, González, Scarpulla, JJ.
Ind No. 3833/16 Appeal No. 12844 Case No. 2018-04243
v
Justin Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant.
Stephen Chu, Interim Attorney-in-Charge, Office of the Appellate Defender New York (Kami Lizarraga of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael D. Tarbutton of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered November 03, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is
hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: January 12, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.