State v. Feathers

[Cite as State v. Feathers, 2021-Ohio-171.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2020-P-0095 - vs - : DAVID E. FEATHERS, : Defendant-Appellant. : Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2016 CR 00695. Judgment: Appeal dismissed. Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). David E. Feathers, PID# A763-828, Marion Correctional Institution, 940 Marion- Williamsport Road, P.O. Box 57, Marion, OH 43302 (Defendant-Appellant). THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. {¶1} Appellant, David E. Feathers, moves to file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A). {¶2} Appellant moves to appeal the trial court’s May 17, 2017 entry sentencing him to 180 days in jail; probation; and a 20-year driver’s license suspension, after entering a guilty plea to failure to comply. {¶3} A timely notice of appeal was due no later than June 16, 2017. Appellant’s appeal is untimely by over three and one-half years. {¶4} No brief or memorandum in opposition to appellant’s motion has been filed. {¶5} App.R. 4(A)(1) states, in part: {¶6} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of that entry.” {¶7} App.R. 5(A) provides: {¶8} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: {¶9} “(a) Criminal proceedings; {¶10} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and {¶11} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings. {¶12} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals.” {¶13} In his motion, appellant asserts that the underlying case was “packaged with two cases, and cases numbers, presently pending before this court for review and consideration.” He contends that the May 17, 2017 entry “is the foundational heart of all aforementioned consolidated companion cases.” That appellant has other appeals pending with this court that he considers relevant to this case, however, is not a justifiable reason for appealing over three and one-half years late. 2 {¶14} Appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is overruled. {¶15} Appeal dismissed. MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J., CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., concur. 3