United States v. Carter

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50167 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER SEAN CARTER, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-28-ALL -------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Christopher Sean Carter, federal prisoner # 68711-080, pleaded guilty in 1996 to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Carter now appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. Carter’s contention that his sentence is subject to modification in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is without merit. Section 3582(c)(2) is inapplicable because Booker did not involve a retroactive amendment to the * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-50167 -2- Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 28 (5th Cir. 1994); § 3582(c)(2). With respect to Carter’s assertion that he is entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 591 to the Guidelines, Carter did not raise this argument in the district court. Accordingly, we need not consider it. See United States v. Pardue, 36 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir. 1994). Regardless, Carter’s argument is without merit. Amendment 591 is not relevant to either the determination of a specific offense level within the applicable guideline section or the consideration of relevant conduct. See U.S.S.G. App. C, Amendment 591 (Nov. 2000). Therefore, the district court was not prohibited from considering additional amounts of drugs not included in the charged offense. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.