United States v. Nava

Case: 20-50773      Document: 00515855529         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/10/2021




              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                          May 10, 2021
                                  No. 20-50773
                               Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk


   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Juan Manuel Nava,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:19-CR-193-2


   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Juan Manuel Nava has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Nava has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the


          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50773     Document: 00515855529         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/10/2021




                                  No. 20-50773


   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.




                                       2