In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-0644V
UNPUBLISHED
SHANE BOWERS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: April 12, 2021
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner.
Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
On May 1, 2019, Shane Bowers filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that the receipt of a Tdap vaccine in his right arm on
April 24, 2018 caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(SIRVA). Petition at 1, 6. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.
On February 18, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
entitled to compensation for a right SIRVA. On April 9, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer
on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $60,000.00.
Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
1
Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an
award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $60,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount
represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
SHANE BOWERS,
)
)
Petitioner,
) No. 19-644V
v.
) Chief Special Master Corcoran
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
)
SERVICES,
)
)
Respondent.
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
On February 17, 2021, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was
appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. The Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on
Entitlement on February 18, 2021, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation
for his right-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Based upon the
evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $60,000.00. This
amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment of $60,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 Petitioner
agrees.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
and future pain and suffering.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON
Acting Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Acting Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
DARRYL R. WISHARD
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/Traci R. Patton
TRACI R. PATTON
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 353-1589
E-mail: Traci.Patton@usdoj.gov
Dated: April 9, 2021
2