Case: 20-40680 Document: 00515912884 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2021
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 24, 2021
No. 20-40680
Lyle W. Cayce
Conference Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Bridget Marie Dobrovolsky,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
No. 4:19-CR-242-9
Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Bridget Dobrovolsky has moved
to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dobrovolsky has
filed a pro se response and motion for appointment of substitute counsel. The
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin-
ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40680 Document: 00515912884 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/24/2021
No. 20-40680
record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of
Dobrovolsky’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore de-
cline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United
States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and
Dobrovolsky’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, coun-
sel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion for appointment of sub-
stitute counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901,
902−03 (5th Cir. 1998).
2