Muamar Anani, Hanadi Anani, Big D Concrete, Inc., and Anani, LLC v. Joseph Abuzaid, Nadia Adnani A/K/A Nadia Abuzaid and David Edward Wittwer

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed July 2, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01364-CV MUAMAR ANANI, HANADI ANANI, BIG D CONCRETE, INC., AND ANANI, LLC, Appellants V. JOSEPH ABUZAID, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09866-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck and Carlyle1 Opinion by Justice Schenck By order dated June 4, 2021 we reinstated this appeal. In that order, we advised the parties that orders on both appellants’ motion for rehearing and appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing would issue in due course. 1 The Honorable Justice Cory L. Carlyle succeeded the Honorable Douglas Lang, a member of the original panel. The Honorable Robert Filmore was on the panel at the time of original submission of this case. Justice Fillmore has since retired. This opinion issues pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX. R. APP. P. 41.1(b). On June 11, 2021, appellants filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal advising the Court that they reached a settlement with the bankruptcy trustee by which Anani, LLC purchased Joseph Abuzaid’s judgment. Appellants further advise the Court that they conferred with counsel for Joseph Abuzaid and he does not oppose dismissal of this appeal. We grant appellants’ motion to dismiss, withdraw this Court’s opinion of June 7, 2018 and vacate this Court’s judgment of June 7, 2018 and dismiss this appeal. /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE 161364F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MUAMAR ANANI, HANADI On Appeal from the 95th District ANANI, BIG D CONCRETE, INC., Court, Dallas County, Texas AND ANANI, LLC, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09866- D. No. 05-16-01364-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justice Carlyle JOSEPH ABUZAID, Appellee participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. We ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this 2nd day of July 2021. –3–