State ex rel. Hart v. Clausen

Mackintosh, J.

(concurring) — I think the reasoning of this case is sound, and therefore concur in Judge Main’s opinion. The purpose for which the bonds are *583to be issued is unquestionably a public one, while I am still of the opinion that the purpose in the case of State ex rel. Reclamation Board v. Clausen, 110 Wash. 525, 188 Pac. 538, was private.