Arola v. Hays

Per Curiam.

In this action, which was begun by a client against her attorney for the return of money received by him, he has set up a counterclaim seeking to recover for legal services performed for her' and at her request. The only question presented on the appeal is as to the proper amount to be allowed on this counterclaim. An examination of the record does not disclose any reason why we should interfere with the amount awarded by the trial court, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.