State v. Ray

Gose, J.

(dissenting) — -The information does not charge a. continuing offense as in State v. Dix, 33 Wash. 405, 74 Pac. 570. I therefore think that each theft constituted petit larceny. Grand larceny cannot be made to consist of two or more petit larcenies. The motion to require an election should have been sustained. I therefore dissent.

Fullerton, J., concurs with Gose, J.