[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
March 28, 2006
No. 05-15532 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00135-CR-CLS-RRA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES EUGENE PRITCHETT,
a.k.a. Mookie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 28, 2006)
Before BIRCH, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Charles Pritchett in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pritchett’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2