Jones v. Jones

Chadwick, J.

(dissenting) — It was never the intention of Mrs. Jones to hire Judge Boot. He was employed, or rather associated by his coappellant Olson, and for his benefit. The fact that he was working out the case for Olson should not bind Mrs. Jones to pay for his services. For the services performed — considering also those unperformed —I think the compensation allowed by the lower court was ample. I therefore dissent.