^Action for divorce on the grounds of nonsupport and neglect. The parties were married at North Yakima in August, 1914. Respondent worked at “odd jobs” for three weeks .in North Yakima, and then borrowed money with which to take himself and wife to the home of his parents in Seattle. One child was born as the fruit of their union.
The record shows that, during the time intervening between November, 1914, and May, 1915, respondent had but two months of steady employment, and that during that time he contributed nothing to the support of his wife. In May,
It is unnecessary to further detail “the short and simple annals” of this unhappy pair. We find the charge of nonsupport to be unquestionably sustained.
“Divorces may be granted by the superior court on application of the party injured, for the following causes:
“(6) ... or the neglect or refusal of the husband to make suitable provisions for his family.” Rem. Code, § 982.
Reversed and remanded with directions to grant the prayer of appellant’s complaint.
Ellis, C. J., Main, and Webster, JJ., concur.