United States v. Orisman Enrique Rincones-Onate

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-14431 April 26, 2006 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00483 CR-T-24-TGW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORISMAN ENRIQUE RINCONES-ONATE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (April 26, 2006) Before ANDERSON, FAY and SILER*, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: _____________________ *Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. We note that appellant does not challenge his conviction, and it is accordingly affirmed. Appellant’s only challenge on appeal is that his sentence is unreasonable. First, we reject the government’s argument that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the sentence for reasonableness; that argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Martinez, 434 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2006). However, we readily conclude, for the reasons discussed at oral argument, that the sentence imposed by the district court is not unreasonable. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2