[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-14431 April 26, 2006
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 04-00483 CR-T-24-TGW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORISMAN ENRIQUE RINCONES-ONATE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(April 26, 2006)
Before ANDERSON, FAY and SILER*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
_____________________
*Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
We note that appellant does not challenge his conviction, and it is accordingly
affirmed. Appellant’s only challenge on appeal is that his sentence is
unreasonable. First, we reject the government’s argument that this court lacks
jurisdiction to review the sentence for reasonableness; that argument is foreclosed
by our decision in United States v. Martinez, 434 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2006).
However, we readily conclude, for the reasons discussed at oral argument, that the
sentence imposed by the district court is not unreasonable.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2