Johnson v. Immerman

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks review of an order of the trial judge granting defendants’ motion for new trial solely on *476the issue of damages. The appellant has failed to demonstrate, from this record, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Therefore, the order is affirmed. See: Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 740; McLoughlin v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 560.

Affirmed.