Rangel v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not *912revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court’s June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.