Rangel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date filed: 2012-11-21
Citations: 101 So. 3d 911, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20195, 2012 WL 5870052
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not

Page 912
revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court’s June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.