Walker v. State

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Walker’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to Walker filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that affirmatively demonstrates on the face of the record his entitlement to additional credit. See Woody v. State, 993 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.