Hudson v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d

*6221236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))); see also Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla.2012).