Butler v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion to challenge any concurrent habitual felony offender and prison releasee reoffender sentences that are of equal length in violation of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). See also Bartee v. State, 28 So.3d 119 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.