Marshall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date filed: 2013-11-22
Citations: 127 So. 3d 720, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18571, 2013 WL 6122227
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
PER CURIAM.

After a review of the presentence investigation report, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing drug and alcohol treatment related requirements as special conditions of probation. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Austin v. State, 67 So.3d 403, 406-07 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.