(concurring in part and concurring in the result).
I concur to reverse the judgment on the breaeh-of-contract claim and the money-lent claim, and I concur to affirm the judgment on the account-stated claim. As to the “gift” issue discussed in Part IV, I *535express no opinion. I note that there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court could have entered a summary judgment in favor of Peed based upon a theory that the transfer was a gift.