PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gibbs v. Cochran, 142 So.2d 276, 278 (Fla.1962) (holding that the jurisdiction of the parole commission is not disturbed when the infraction giving rise to revocation was committed during the parole period, but actual revocation occurred after the period had run); Harris v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 654 So.2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (table) (per curiam affirming Appellant’s earlier identical jurisdictional challenge).