Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We are presented with two issues in this case, the first involving jury instructions and the second concerning the availability of punitive damages for negligence and strict liability. We affirm the first issue without comment, and affirm the second based on our decision in Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So.3d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), review granted, 139 So.3d 887 (Fla.2014).

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.