Maloney v. State

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Russell Maloney, appeals his judgment and sentence and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm as to that issue without further discussion. We remand the case back to the trial court, however, for entry of a corrected judgment in light of the trial court’s oral ruling on Appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The State concedes that remand is appropriate in this case.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.