Hilkirk v. Johnson

LEDET, J.,

concurs.

I concur in the result.

I find that the record does not present clear and convincing evidence that sole custody is in the best interest of L. J. However, I do not find any prejudicial error of law to determine the facts de novo. Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98), 708 So.2d 731.

Therefore, I would remand for a hearing pursuant to La. C.C. art. 132.