Rigg v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2015); Harris v. State, 30 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

As the appellant’s motion in the circuit court and this appeal are successive, the appellant is cautioned that further successive and non-meritorious filings may subject him to sanctions. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2015), and Spencer v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 823 So.2d 752 (Fla.2002).