PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error contained in the probation ■ revocation order, which states that the appellant violated “Condition [] 2” of her probation rather than “Modification of Probation Condition (2).” See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error in probation revocation order.
ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.